Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -232.9%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $214747 | $301058 | $221M | $170M | $500M | $2.8B | $1.3B | $745M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-14175254 | $-14088942 | $224M | $163M | $498M | $2.8B | $1.3B | $737M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | 0.03 | 13.65 | 6.79 | 25.40 | 241.68 | 626.88 | 687.48 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.01 | 0.02 | 1298.97 | 17.04 | 26.03 | 31.10 | 118.27 | 55.44 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -1.24 | 13.87 | 6.51 | 25.31 | 240.44 | 623.62 | 679.69 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.3% | 21.3% | 37.7% | 39.0% | 43.3% | 43.9% | 58.5% | 52.7% | 34.6% | -639.6% | -441.1% |
| Operating Margin | -114.5% | -114.5% | -103.5% | -130.9% | -431.8% | -214.9% | -908.1% | -1916.1% | -1544.4% | -7433.8% | -4581.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -182.7% | -182.7% | -102.8% | -120.9% | -434.3% | -177.8% | -907.6% | -2830.2% | -1971.3% | -7433.8% | -4581.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -232.9% | -232.9% | -327.5% | -207.8% | -155.5% | -40.8% | -153.6% | -922.9% | — | -354.4% | -260.8% |
| ROA | -123.1% | -123.1% | -89.8% | -109.2% | -134.6% | -37.5% | -131.8% | -315.7% | -454.9% | -322.6% | -238.2% |
| ROIC | -275.8% | -275.8% | -358.2% | -239.3% | -136.2% | -46.8% | -305.4% | -490.3% | -725.2% | -581.1% | -495.6% |
| ROCE | -136.4% | -136.4% | -253.4% | -208.7% | -153.5% | -48.5% | -146.5% | -624.8% | — | -354.4% | -260.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 29.26 | 0.08 | 0.04 | — | 0.11 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.82 | 21.56 | -0.68 | -0.09 | -0.16 | -0.62 | -0.63 | — | -0.46 | -0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.52 | -1.52 | -28.47 | -611.86 | -125.15 | -4770.80 | -2340.50 | -2.09 | -3.62 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($14M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.36 | 4.36 | 0.54 | 1.25 | 0.93 | 3.97 | 5.12 | 9.62 | 0.32 | 6.78 | 6.48 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.36 | 4.36 | 0.54 | 1.25 | 0.93 | 3.97 | 5.12 | 9.62 | 0.32 | 6.78 | 6.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.44 | 3.44 | 0.13 | 0.57 | 0.23 | 2.60 | 4.34 | 8.41 | 0.24 | 4.45 | 6.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.52 | 1.38 | 0.99 | 0.65 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 78.94 | 84.95 | 120.61 | 113.78 | 197.89 | 103.98 | 98.66 | 170.23 | 206.29 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $41072 | $745025 | $233254 | $154956 | $124512 | $47625 | $32893 | $36162 | $36162 | $36162 |
Liquidity and dilution risk
According to recent market data, SLE trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.02, a figure that suggests investors are pricing in significant insolvency risk rather than growth potential, especially when compared to the broader communication services sector and the company's own historical valuation premiums.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that the market has largely abandoned the growth narrative previously associated with the company's metaverse-adjacent business model. This valuation level implies that the market views the current revenue base as potentially non-recurring or structurally impaired, necessitating a deep discount to account for the high probability of further dilutive financing.
Based on reported figures, SLE's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -46.1% in 2026Q1, which highlights a consistent inability to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the cost of funding, a trend that has persisted throughout the last ten quarters of operations.
The inability to achieve positive returns on capital suggests that the company's strategic pivots and acquisitions have failed to create economic value. Investors should monitor whether the current management team can optimize the asset base, as the current trajectory indicates that every dollar of capital deployed continues to erode shareholder value.
As reported in financial statements, the company's DSO has fluctuated significantly, reaching 76 days in 2026Q1, which, when combined with high DPO levels, suggests that SLE struggles to manage its cash conversion cycle effectively in a volatile advertising environment.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle reflects a lack of leverage over both customers and suppliers, forcing the company to rely on external capital to bridge the gap between service delivery and cash collection. This inefficiency exacerbates the firm's liquidity constraints, as cash remains tied up in receivables for extended periods.
Based on the company's quarterly filings, the current ratio has shown extreme volatility, dropping from 4.36 in 2025Q4 to 3.06 in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm's ability to cover short-term obligations is becoming increasingly dependent on the timing of capital raises.
While the current ratio may appear superficially adequate, the underlying cash burn rate suggests that the company's liquidity position is highly vulnerable to even minor operational disruptions. The lack of consistent internal cash generation means that the firm remains perpetually exposed to capital market volatility.
Investors frequently misapply the price-to-sales ratio to SLE, failing to recognize that the company's gross margin of 21.31% suggests a high pass-through cost structure that renders top-line revenue a poor proxy for the actual value-add generated by the firm's technical integrations.
Using P/S as a primary valuation tool obscures the reality that a significant portion of reported revenue may be shared with platform owners and creators, leaving little for the company itself. A more appropriate metric would be an adjusted gross profit multiple, which would better reflect the firm's true earning power and operational scale.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SLE stock.
Super League Enterprise, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Super League Enterprise, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -232.9%. The historical average is -216.7%.
Based on historical data, Super League Enterprise, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Super League Enterprise, Inc. has 21.3% gross margin and -114.5% operating margin.