Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -15.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -123.1%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.6B | $5.1B | $4.3B | $1.4B | $539M | $912M | $1.5B | $363M | $360M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $5.4B | $4.8B | $4.2B | $1.4B | $506M | $784M | $1.4B | $332M | $245M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -15.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | 16.25 | 48.47 | 96.83 | 17.71 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 21.93 | 20.58 | 11.71 | 6.34 | 2.07 | 5.30 | 5.72 | 3.21 | 3.37 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.58 | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.64 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | 15.23 | 41.64 | 90.13 | 16.20 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10.62 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | -270.7% | -476.5% | -380.8% | -164.6% | — | — | -3192.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | -404.8% | -690.5% | -564.0% | -266.2% | — | — | -4277.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | -405.2% | -700.5% | -561.5% | -248.9% | — | — | -4276.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -123.1% | -123.1% | -82.9% | -68.3% | -62.2% | -60.9% | -46.3% | -46.5% | -185.8% | — | — |
| ROA | -86.0% | -86.0% | -62.7% | -49.5% | -40.6% | -38.1% | -29.6% | -27.0% | -40.6% | -52.9% | -49.4% |
| ROIC | -201.2% | -201.2% | -85.7% | -62.4% | -74.6% | -96.8% | -54.4% | -110.7% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -99.0% | -99.0% | -71.4% | -57.1% | -47.8% | -44.3% | -34.1% | -34.8% | -49.0% | -57.9% | -54.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.00 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.87 | -0.31 | -0.18 | -0.13 | -0.75 | -0.40 | -0.27 | -1.07 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -4.97 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -53.83 | -53.83 | -35.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -853.16 |
Net cash position: cash ($324M) exceeds total debt ($109M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.95 | 6.95 | 9.61 | 8.80 | 9.01 | 4.13 | 8.09 | 5.64 | 5.72 | 11.78 | 9.48 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.95 | 6.95 | 9.61 | 8.80 | 9.01 | 4.13 | 8.09 | 5.64 | 5.72 | 11.78 | 9.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.63 | 6.63 | 9.32 | 8.55 | 8.67 | 3.93 | 8.01 | 4.80 | 5.64 | 11.54 | 9.33 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.10 | — | — | 0.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | 30.07 | — | — | 445.30 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.4% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $115M | $100M | $76M | $60M | $37M | $31M | $28M | $16M | $18M | $18M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SRRK stock.
Scholar Rock Holding Corporation's current P/E ratio is -15.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Scholar Rock Holding Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -123.1%. The historical average is -84.5%.
Based on historical data, Scholar Rock Holding Corporation is trading at a P/E of -15.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn without revenue
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Losses Reflect Pre-Revenue Burn
Scholar Rock's operating margin deteriorated from -1,000% in 2024Q1 to -2,000% in 2026Q2, according to financial statements, underscoring escalating R&D and SG&A costs with no product revenue.
The absence of gross margin and deeply negative operating margins are typical for a late-stage biotech, but the widening losses from $58.4M to $108.9M in operating income over the period indicate accelerating burn. This suggests the company is investing heavily in the Phase 3 SAPPHIRE trial and expanding SG&A ahead of potential commercialization, which may pressure near-term profitability. Investors should monitor whether these costs translate into successful regulatory outcomes, as the current margin profile offers no buffer.
Return on Capital Decays Sharply
ROIC swung from -26.1% in 2024Q1 to -186.6% in 2026Q1, based on reported figures, reflecting a deteriorating return on invested capital as losses outpace any capital efficiency gains.
The dramatic decline in ROIC, particularly the spike to -186.6% in 2026Q1, suggests that the company's invested capital base is not generating productive returns, consistent with a pre-revenue clinical-stage model. This decay is driven by expanding losses rather than asset growth, as total assets rose to $523.5M primarily from cash raises. The negative ROE of -123.1% further indicates that shareholder equity is being consumed by operational burn, with no near-term prospect of positive returns unless apitegromab succeeds.
Liquidity Buffer Strong but Finite
Current ratio improved to 7.02 in 2026Q2 from 6.58 in 2024Q1, with cash of $437.1M covering over two years of operating burn, based on reported quarterly cash flow data.
The high current and quick ratios, both at 7.02, indicate a robust liquidity position, largely due to the cash-heavy balance sheet where cash constitutes 83.5% of total assets. This provides a substantial runway to the SAPPHIRE readout, but the finite nature of the cash pile means that continued burn without revenue will require additional financing. The absence of inventory and receivables simplifies the liquidity analysis, but the reliance on external capital markets remains a key vulnerability.
Leverage Rises as Debt Doubles
Debt-to-equity climbed from 0.33 in 2024Q1 to 0.80 in 2026Q2, with total debt reaching $203.8M, according to balance sheet data, signaling a strategic shift toward debt financing.
The doubling of total debt from $60.1M to $203.8M over the period suggests the company is increasingly using leverage to fund operations, possibly to avoid further equity dilution. However, with negative interest coverage (e.g., -23.32 in 2026Q2), the company's earnings are insufficient to service debt, indicating reliance on cash reserves or refinancing. This rising leverage, combined with no revenue, may heighten refinancing risk if capital markets tighten, though the current cash position provides a temporary cushion.
Working Capital Efficiency Minimal
Asset turnover is negligible due to zero revenue, while DPO spiked to 2,622 days in 2026Q1, based on reported figures, indicating extended supplier payment terms that may mask cash flow pressures.
The absence of revenue renders asset turnover meaningless, but the extreme DPO values, such as 2,622 days in 2026Q1, suggest the company is stretching payables, possibly to conserve cash. This could indicate supplier leverage or delayed payments, which may strain relationships if sustained. The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DSO and DIO, but the working capital swings are minimal, reflecting a simple operational model focused on R&D rather than inventory management.
Misapplied ROE in Pre-Revenue Biotech
ROE is commonly misapplied to Scholar Rock, as its -123.1% figure reflects accounting losses rather than operational performance, obscuring the company's true value driver: clinical trial progress.
For a clinical-stage biotech with no revenue, ROE is misleading because it penalizes the company for investing heavily in R&D, which is essential for future value creation. Instead, investors should focus on cash runway, trial enrollment, and probability of success for apitegromab, as these metrics better reflect the company's potential. The negative ROE is a function of the business model, not inefficiency, and using it to compare against profitable peers would be inappropriate.