Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 63.1x · EV/EBITDA 45.4x · ROE 371.5%. (2001–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $196.7B | $187.8B | $30.7B | $21.9B | $12.8B | $15.5B | $21.3B | $12.5B | $13.4B | $16.5B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $198.6B | $189.7B | $34.8B | $26.2B | $17.9B | $20.6B | $25.3B | $15.1B | $15.5B | $19.5B | $14.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 63.12 | 59.00 | 20.89 | 65.36 | — | 9.39 | 16.24 | 12.49 | 6.67 | 13.94 | 15.02 |
| P/S Ratio | 16.13 | 15.40 | 3.37 | 3.34 | 1.73 | 1.33 | 2.00 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.47 | 1.08 |
| P/B Ratio | 92.71 | 86.67 | — | — | — | 141.98 | 33.79 | 7.02 | 6.21 | 9.90 | 8.49 |
| P/FCF | 53.54 | 51.12 | 37.52 | 32.97 | 20.46 | 12.13 | 18.90 | 11.11 | 11.59 | 9.44 | 7.82 |
| P/OCF | 53.54 | 51.12 | 28.34 | 23.85 | 13.60 | 9.34 | 13.11 | 7.32 | 7.63 | 7.80 | 6.05 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 15.55 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 2.42 | 1.76 | 2.37 | 1.43 | 1.49 | 1.74 | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.44 | 43.40 | 16.25 | 36.61 | 104.42 | 8.54 | 13.40 | 8.97 | 7.62 | 8.72 | 7.80 |
| EV / EBIT | 48.51 | 47.73 | 18.97 | 33.73 | — | 10.66 | 16.14 | 12.22 | 9.69 | 11.76 | 13.57 |
| EV / FCF | — | 51.63 | 42.54 | 39.47 | 28.52 | 16.11 | 22.43 | 13.34 | 13.34 | 11.14 | 9.49 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 45.6% | 35.2% | 23.4% | 19.2% | 29.7% | 27.3% | 27.0% | 28.2% | 30.1% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | 33.6% | 33.6% | 20.8% | 6.9% | -4.6% | 16.8% | 14.0% | 12.4% | 14.3% | 14.6% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 26.1% | 26.1% | 16.1% | 5.1% | -7.2% | 14.1% | 12.3% | 9.6% | 19.4% | 10.6% | 7.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 371.5% | 371.5% | — | — | — | 445.7% | 108.7% | 50.8% | 105.1% | 78.0% | 52.2% |
| ROA | 35.4% | 35.4% | 18.6% | 4.4% | -6.4% | 18.7% | 14.9% | 11.3% | 22.0% | 12.7% | 8.8% |
| ROIC | 80.0% | 80.0% | 43.8% | 10.2% | -5.7% | 29.9% | 25.1% | 22.9% | 25.3% | 28.9% | 18.8% |
| ROCE | 67.0% | 67.0% | 37.7% | 9.4% | -6.6% | 35.1% | 24.9% | 20.2% | 23.1% | 25.4% | 16.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.65 | 1.65 | — | — | — | 52.26 | 8.23 | 2.37 | 1.97 | 2.89 | 3.68 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.82 | 0.82 | 2.33 | 7.92 | 34.12 | 2.37 | 2.75 | 2.52 | 2.10 | 2.16 | 2.78 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.86 | — | — | — | 46.61 | 6.31 | 1.41 | 0.94 | 1.78 | 1.82 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.43 | 0.43 | 1.92 | 6.03 | 29.53 | 2.11 | 2.11 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 1.33 | 1.38 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.51 | 5.02 | 6.50 | 8.07 | 3.98 | 3.53 | 2.23 | 1.75 | 1.70 | 1.67 |
| Interest Coverage | 13.99 | 13.99 | 5.71 | 2.34 | -0.58 | 7.74 | 7.13 | 6.13 | 7.13 | 7.01 | 4.67 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.38 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.29 | 1.51 | 1.95 | 1.35 | 1.92 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 1.09 | 1.52 | 1.02 | 1.55 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.97 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.22 | 1.13 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 1.30 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.22 | 4.22 | 4.10 | 4.05 | 5.23 | 5.23 | 6.45 | 6.71 | 7.69 | 7.43 | 7.74 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 45.91 | 43.33 | 30.03 | 38.95 | 50.55 | 39.57 | 38.73 | 34.74 | 38.64 | 40.63 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 4.5% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 19.9% | 19.9% | 40.8% | 174.6% | — | 37.0% | 49.4% | 67.0% | 35.4% | 61.4% | 72.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.6% | 1.7% | 4.8% | 1.5% | — | 10.7% | 6.2% | 8.0% | 15.0% | 7.2% | 6.7% |
| FCF Yield | 1.9% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 3.0% | 4.9% | 8.2% | 5.3% | 9.0% | 8.6% | 10.6% | 12.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.2% | 11.6% | 9.6% | 6.8% | 7.2% | 2.2% | 4.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 7.7% | 15.6% | 12.6% | 12.1% | 12.5% | 6.6% | 8.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $229M | $217M | $212M | $207M | $224M | $245M | $265M | $285M | $292M | $299M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying STX stock.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's current P/E ratio is 63.1x. The historical average is 17.2x. This places it at the 95th percentile of its historical range.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's current EV/EBITDA is 45.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.8x.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's return on equity (ROE) is 371.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 70.3%.
Based on historical data, Seagate Technology Holdings plc is trading at a P/E of 63.1x. This is at the 95th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's current dividend yield is 0.32% with a payout ratio of 19.9%.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc has 45.6% gross margin and 33.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cyclical demand and high leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion on HAMR Mix
Gross margin surged from 25.7% in 2024Q3 to 52.3% in 2026Q4, a 26.6-point expansion, per quarterly filings, reflecting a favorable shift toward high-capacity drives and strong operating leverage.
The 52.3% gross margin in 2026Q4 is nearly double the 25.7% reported in 2024Q3, indicating that the product mix is skewing toward higher-margin mass-capacity drives, likely aided by HAMR technology adoption. Operating margin followed a similar trajectory, climbing from 8.6% to 42.5% over the same period, which suggests that fixed-cost absorption is improving as utilization rises. However, the recent EPS miss despite a revenue beat hints that one-time charges or elevated expenses may be tempering net margin, which stood at 35.7% in 2026Q4, so investors should monitor whether this margin level is sustainable or partly driven by cyclical tailwinds.
ROIC Inflection Signals Compounding
ROIC expanded from 3.5% in 2024Q3 to 27.4% in 2026Q4, a 24-point improvement, as reported in financial statements, indicating that the company is now generating substantial returns on invested capital after a period of underperformance.
The ROIC trajectory is striking: it was a mere 3.5% in 2024Q3, barely covering the cost of capital, but has since climbed to 27.4% in 2026Q4, driven by both margin expansion and improved asset turnover (from 0.23 to 0.38). This suggests that Seagate is not just recovering cyclically but is also benefiting from structural improvements in capital efficiency, likely due to higher-margin product mix and disciplined capex. ROE, though volatile due to equity swings, reached 79.3% in 2026Q4, but this is inflated by a relatively small equity base; ROIC is the more reliable measure of economic return here.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Slightly
Cash conversion cycle turned positive from -12 days in 2024Q4 to 27 days in 2026Q4, per quarterly data, as DSO rose from 24 to 36 days, indicating a modest increase in working capital needs amid rapid growth.
The shift from a negative CCC to a positive one is notable: in 2024Q4, Seagate was effectively financing operations with supplier credit (DPO of 122 days), but by 2026Q4, DPO had fallen to 90 days while DSO increased to 36 days. This suggests that as the company scales, it is extending more credit to customers (likely hyperscalers) while paying suppliers faster, which could be a strategic move to secure supply or a reflection of changing bargaining power. The DIO has remained relatively stable around 82-90 days, indicating that inventory management is consistent, but the overall CCC of 27 days is still manageable and does not yet signal a liquidity strain.
Rapid Deleveraging Improves Coverage
Debt-to-equity fell from 10.47 in 2026Q2 to 1.78 in 2026Q4, while interest coverage rose from 10.82 to 22.36, according to recent SEC filings, indicating a significantly more comfortable debt service position.
The balance sheet has undergone a dramatic transformation: D/E peaked at 10.47 in 2026Q2, but aggressive debt repayment and equity rebuilding have brought it down to 1.78 by 2026Q4. Interest coverage has more than doubled from 10.82 to 22.36 over the same period, suggesting that earnings are now ample to cover interest expenses, reducing near-term refinancing risk. However, the absolute debt level remains substantial, and the company's history of prioritizing capital returns over debt reduction means that leverage could rise again if the cycle turns; investors should monitor whether this deleveraging trend is sustained or reversed.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Quick Ratio Lags
Current ratio improved from 0.85 in 2024Q3 to 1.59 in 2026Q4, while quick ratio rose from 0.47 to 1.11, per balance sheet data, indicating a stronger short-term liquidity position, though inventory still plays a role.
The current ratio has moved from below 1.0 to a comfortable 1.59, and the quick ratio has more than doubled to 1.11, suggesting that Seagate can cover its short-term obligations without relying on inventory liquidation. The improvement is driven by a doubling of cash to $1.7B and a reduction in current liabilities, likely from debt paydown. While the quick ratio above 1.0 is a positive sign, the gap between current and quick ratios (0.48 points) indicates that inventory remains a significant component of current assets, which could be a risk if demand suddenly softens and inventory becomes harder to sell.
P/E Misleads in Cyclical Recovery
The trailing P/E of 61.15 and forward P/E of 57.02 appear extreme, but they reflect near-trough earnings; EV/EBITDA of 44.04 is also elevated, yet the market may be pricing in a cyclical peak, per current valuation data.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Seagate is the P/E multiple, because earnings are highly cyclical and currently near a peak, making the P/E appear deceptively high. A trailing P/E of 61.15 suggests the market is paying a premium, but this is likely because earnings have just recovered from a trough; using a mid-cycle earnings estimate would yield a more reasonable multiple. Similarly, EV/EBITDA of 44.04 is inflated by the same cyclicality, but it also reflects the market's expectation that current EBITDA levels are sustainable, which may be overly optimistic given the industry's history of boom-bust cycles. Investors should instead focus on EV/Sales or normalize earnings over a full cycle to assess valuation, as the current multiples may be misleading.