Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 24.3x · EV/EBITDA 18.4x · ROE 371.5%. (2001–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $103.4B | $187.8B | $30.7B | $21.9B | $12.8B | $15.5B | $21.3B | $12.5B | $13.4B | $16.5B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $105.5B | $190.0B | $34.8B | $26.2B | $17.9B | $20.6B | $25.3B | $15.1B | $15.5B | $19.5B | $14.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 24.33 | 59.00 | 20.89 | 65.36 | — | 9.39 | 16.24 | 12.49 | 6.67 | 13.94 | 15.02 |
| P/S Ratio | 7.49 | 15.40 | 3.37 | 3.34 | 1.73 | 1.33 | 2.00 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.47 | 1.08 |
| P/B Ratio | 48.72 | 86.67 | — | — | — | 141.98 | 33.79 | 7.02 | 6.21 | 9.90 | 8.49 |
| P/FCF | 23.61 | 60.49 | 37.52 | 32.97 | 20.46 | 12.13 | 18.90 | 11.11 | 11.59 | 9.44 | 7.82 |
| P/OCF | 28.13 | 51.12 | 28.34 | 23.85 | 13.60 | 9.34 | 13.11 | 7.32 | 7.63 | 7.80 | 6.05 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 15.58 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 2.42 | 1.76 | 2.37 | 1.43 | 1.49 | 1.74 | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.41 | 43.47 | 16.25 | 36.61 | 104.42 | 8.54 | 13.40 | 8.97 | 7.62 | 8.72 | 7.80 |
| EV / EBIT | 25.77 | 47.80 | 18.97 | 33.73 | — | 10.66 | 16.14 | 12.22 | 9.69 | 11.76 | 13.57 |
| EV / FCF | — | 61.18 | 42.54 | 39.47 | 28.52 | 16.11 | 22.43 | 13.34 | 13.34 | 11.14 | 9.49 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 45.6% | 35.2% | 23.4% | 19.2% | 29.7% | 27.3% | 27.0% | 28.2% | 30.1% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | 33.6% | 33.6% | 20.8% | 6.9% | -4.6% | 16.8% | 14.0% | 12.4% | 14.3% | 14.6% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 26.1% | 26.1% | 16.1% | 5.1% | -7.2% | 14.1% | 12.3% | 9.6% | 19.4% | 10.6% | 7.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 371.5% | 371.5% | — | — | — | 445.7% | 108.7% | 50.8% | 105.1% | 78.0% | 52.2% |
| ROA | 35.4% | 35.4% | 18.6% | 4.4% | -6.4% | 18.7% | 14.9% | 11.3% | 22.0% | 12.7% | 8.8% |
| ROIC | 77.0% | 77.0% | 43.8% | 10.2% | -5.7% | 29.9% | 25.1% | 22.9% | 25.3% | 28.9% | 18.8% |
| ROCE | 67.9% | 67.9% | 37.7% | 9.4% | -6.6% | 35.1% | 24.9% | 20.2% | 23.1% | 25.4% | 16.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.78 | 1.78 | — | — | — | 52.26 | 8.23 | 2.37 | 1.97 | 2.89 | 3.68 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.88 | 0.88 | 2.33 | 7.92 | 34.12 | 2.37 | 2.75 | 2.52 | 2.10 | 2.16 | 2.78 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.99 | — | — | — | 46.61 | 6.31 | 1.41 | 0.94 | 1.78 | 1.82 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.49 | 0.49 | 1.92 | 6.03 | 29.53 | 2.11 | 2.11 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 1.33 | 1.38 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.69 | 5.02 | 6.50 | 8.07 | 3.98 | 3.53 | 2.23 | 1.75 | 1.70 | 1.67 |
| Interest Coverage | 13.99 | 13.99 | 5.71 | 2.34 | -0.58 | 7.74 | 7.13 | 6.13 | 7.13 | 7.01 | 4.67 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.38 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.29 | 1.51 | 1.95 | 1.35 | 1.92 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 1.09 | 1.52 | 1.02 | 1.55 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.97 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.22 | 1.13 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 1.30 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.22 | 4.22 | 4.10 | 4.05 | 5.23 | 5.23 | 6.45 | 6.71 | 7.69 | 7.43 | 7.74 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 45.91 | 43.33 | 30.03 | 38.95 | 50.55 | 39.57 | 38.73 | 34.74 | 38.64 | 40.63 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.6% | 0.3% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 4.5% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 19.9% | 19.9% | 40.8% | 174.6% | — | 37.0% | 49.4% | 67.0% | 35.4% | 61.4% | 72.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.1% | 1.7% | 4.8% | 1.5% | — | 10.7% | 6.2% | 8.0% | 15.0% | 7.2% | 6.7% |
| FCF Yield | 4.2% | 1.7% | 2.7% | 3.0% | 4.9% | 8.2% | 5.3% | 9.0% | 8.6% | 10.6% | 12.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.2% | 11.6% | 9.6% | 6.8% | 7.2% | 2.2% | 4.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.8% | 0.4% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 7.7% | 15.6% | 12.6% | 12.1% | 12.5% | 6.6% | 8.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $229M | $217M | $212M | $207M | $224M | $245M | $265M | $285M | $292M | $299M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying STX stock.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's current P/E ratio is 24.3x. The historical average is 17.2x. This places it at the 86th percentile of its historical range.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's current EV/EBITDA is 18.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.8x.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's return on equity (ROE) is 371.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 70.3%.
Based on historical data, Seagate Technology Holdings plc is trading at a P/E of 24.3x. This is at the 86th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's current dividend yield is 0.60% with a payout ratio of 19.9%.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc has 45.6% gross margin and 33.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cyclical margin mean reversion at hyperscaler digestion
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Prices In Flawless Cycle Execution
STX trades at a 50.21x trailing P/E and 73.76x book, versus Western Digital's 15.98x and 16.82x, an extreme premium that appears to price in sustained execution of the current upcycle rather than a normalized storage cycle.
The 46.81x forward P/E and 2.39x PEG appear to underwrite continued high-teens-or-better earnings growth, which for a business whose operating margin has already expanded roughly 32 points in ten quarters leaves limited room for the mean reversion that has historically characterized HDD cycles. Relative to WDC at 15.98x earnings and a 0.28x PEG, STX's 12.83x sales multiple suggests the market is embedding a durability assumption not yet evidenced by a full-cycle margin record. Investors should treat the 0.4% yield as confirmation that the valuation is being supported by multiple expansion rather than income.
Fixed-Cost Leverage Drives Margin Surge
According to recent SEC filings, STX's gross margin expanded from 31.8% in 2024Q4 to 57.3% in 2027Q1, a 25.5-point swing that appears driven by utilization leverage and mass-capacity mix rather than structural pricing change for a business with this fixed-cost profile.
The operating margin path from 16.6% to 48.8% is consistent with a manufacturing base whose R&D and SG&A did not scale alongside revenue, amplifying incremental profitability in a way that is inherently fragile to volume declines. The 2024Q4 anomaly, where a 27.2% net margin exceeded the 16.6% operating margin, signals material non-operating contributions that should be stripped out before treating the current 41.6% net margin as run-rate earning power. The truest reflection of earning power here is likely a mid-cycle gross margin well below 57%, given the industry's pricing dynamics.
Returns Driven by Margins, Not Efficiency
STX's ROIC climbed from 8.1% in 2024Q4 to 34.9% in 2027Q1, and ROE reached 62.7% after a prior period of negative equity, per reported figures—a recovery that appears driven more by margin recovery than asset efficiency gains.
Decomposing the ROIC improvement shows the margin leg dominates, since asset turnover rose only from 0.25x to 0.42x over the same ten quarters; the capital-efficiency contribution is real but secondary. Compared with WDC's 40.7% ROIC, STX appears to be converging, though the 96.3% ROE printed in 2026Q3 should not be read as a durable return level, as it was partly a mechanical consequence of a thin, recently reconstructed equity base. Sustainable compounding would require ROIC to hold above cost of capital through a down-cycle, which the current data cannot yet confirm.
Supplier Float Withdrawal Lifts Cash Cycle
Based on STX's disclosed quarterly figures, the cash conversion cycle reversed from -12 days in 2024Q4 to 27 days in 2027Q1 as DPO compressed from 122 to 91, suggesting the company now relies less on supplier float.
The deterioration is driven by both receivable extension (DSO 24 to 36 days) and payable compression rather than inventory mismanagement, since DIO actually improved modestly from 86 to 82 days. This is a meaningful shift for a business that historically operated on negative working capital, as it means incremental revenue now consumes cash rather than releasing it. Investors should monitor whether the DPO decline reflects suppliers tightening terms or deliberate relationship management, since a further reversal would offset part of the record free cash flow at current margins.
Deleveraging Partly Reflects Rebuilt Equity
As reported in financial statements, STX cut debt-to-equity from 10.47 in 2026Q2 to 0.68 in 2027Q1 while interest coverage rose from 4.72x to 49.34x, a deleveraging that materially reduces refinancing risk but partly reflects equity reconstruction.
The ratio improvement was achieved through both a roughly 58% reduction in total debt and the restoration of a $3.5B equity base from a prior deficit, so the headline de-lever overstates pure credit strengthening. At approximately 1.10x net debt/EBITDA and 49.34x coverage, near-term debt service appears comfortable by any measure. However, goodwill of $1.2B represents roughly a third of book equity and has been static for ten quarters, meaning an impairment would compress the equity cushion and re-inflate leverage; the $400M buyback resumed in 2027Q1 could accelerate that dynamic.
Trailing P/E Misleads on Cyclical Hardware
The trailing P/E is the ratio most commonly misapplied to STX, since a storage hardware business earns peak margins at cycle tops; a 50.21x multiple on currently depressed TTM EPS of $5.71 may look expensive but could compress sharply if hyperscaler digestion repeats.
Because HDD earnings are peak-weighted, a low P/E at the top of the cycle has historically been a signal to reduce exposure rather than a cheapening, so the correct analytical frame is EV/EBITDA measured against a through-cycle EBITDA base. On that basis STX already trades at 36.24x versus WDC's 28.45x, so the apparent discount story disappears once the earnings denominator is normalized. The 73.76x P/B is analytically unusable here, given that equity was negative within the last ten quarters and goodwill is roughly a third of current book value; any conclusion drawn from it should be disregarded in favor of net-debt-to-through-cycle-EBITDA.