Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.5x · EV/EBITDA 15.8x · ROE 8.7%. (2010–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.3B | $7.2B | $6.1B | $5.1B | $3.7B | $3.4B | $2.4B | $2.6B | $2.3B | $2.8B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $25.5B | $22.4B | $14.0B | $9.2B | $7.7B | $7.2B | $6.0B | $6.2B | $5.2B | $7.1B | $6.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.51 | 14.32 | 8.57 | 16.42 | 9.21 | 7.73 | 17.88 | 10.89 | — | 81.14 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.29 | 0.90 | 1.51 | 5.21 | 3.88 | 4.25 | 3.81 | 3.37 | 2.94 | 1.26 | 1.15 |
| P/FCF | 16.69 | 11.69 | 29.95 | 13.25 | 9.75 | 9.34 | 6.37 | 8.91 | — | 9.54 | 35.45 |
| P/OCF | 8.61 | 6.03 | 11.18 | 8.50 | 6.52 | 6.35 | 4.80 | 5.88 | — | 6.45 | 4.49 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.89 | 0.62 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.56 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.61 | 0.69 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.76 | 13.86 | 12.12 | 11.17 | 8.83 | 7.79 | 9.87 | 9.52 | 9.93 | 17.82 | 21.53 |
| EV / EBIT | 27.43 | 19.83 | 21.34 | 14.30 | 11.36 | 10.17 | 14.73 | 13.27 | 21.90 | 30.84 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 36.44 | 68.51 | 23.85 | 20.51 | 19.56 | 15.82 | 21.45 | — | 23.89 | 97.35 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 8.3% | 7.6% | 5.1% | 4.6% | 6.7% | 8.1% | 6.2% | 5.5% | 8.0% | 9.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.6% | 4.3% | 3.9% | 2.8% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.1% | 2.1% | 3.2% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 1.4% | -1.2% | 1.3% | -4.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 28.4% | 32.4% | 45.3% | 61.8% | 19.4% | 30.5% | -13.7% | 6.7% | -10.9% |
| ROA | 2.5% | 2.5% | 6.7% | 4.5% | 6.3% | 8.0% | 2.5% | 4.6% | -3.1% | 1.7% | -4.6% |
| ROIC | 4.0% | 4.0% | 7.0% | 9.5% | 10.6% | 12.8% | 7.3% | 8.6% | 5.1% | 2.6% | 1.6% |
| ROCE | 5.0% | 5.0% | 8.8% | 11.6% | 13.1% | 15.7% | 9.0% | 10.7% | 6.2% | 3.1% | 1.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.01 | 2.01 | 1.97 | 4.21 | 4.37 | 4.68 | 5.81 | 4.78 | 3.81 | 1.91 | 2.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.96 | 9.96 | 6.90 | 5.00 | 4.73 | 4.10 | 6.05 | 5.60 | 5.66 | 10.78 | 14.06 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.90 | 1.94 | 4.18 | 4.29 | 4.65 | 5.65 | 4.75 | 3.74 | 1.90 | 2.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 9.41 | 9.41 | 6.82 | 4.97 | 4.64 | 4.07 | 5.89 | 5.56 | 5.56 | 10.71 | 13.69 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 24.75 | 38.56 | 10.61 | 10.77 | 10.22 | 9.45 | 12.54 | — | 14.35 | 61.90 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.09 | 2.09 | 1.63 | 2.92 | 3.70 | 4.55 | 2.29 | 2.65 | 1.63 | 1.10 | -3.32 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.27 | 1.40 | 1.41 | 1.34 | 1.30 | 1.24 | 1.05 | 3.74 | 1.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 3.39 | 0.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.11 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.89 | 1.58 | 3.37 | 3.75 | 3.03 | 2.03 | 3.05 | 3.48 | 1.40 | 1.15 |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.69 | 9.69 | 19.63 | 24.62 | 29.89 | 30.75 | 25.77 | 37.14 | 42.93 | 25.31 | 24.08 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 28.56 | 18.69 | 13.86 | 12.84 | 11.16 | 10.43 | 9.04 | 8.83 | 21.67 | 19.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.4% | 9.1% | 9.2% | 7.3% | 9.8% | 10.4% | 14.7% | 13.8% | 16.6% | 15.2% | 17.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 124.7% | 124.7% | 79.1% | 119.3% | 90.4% | 80.0% | 262.2% | 150.2% | — | 289.3% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.9% | 7.0% | 11.7% | 6.1% | 10.9% | 12.9% | 5.6% | 9.2% | — | 1.2% | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.0% | 8.6% | 3.3% | 7.5% | 10.3% | 10.7% | 15.7% | 11.2% | — | 10.5% | 2.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 23.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.4% | 9.1% | 9.2% | 7.3% | 9.8% | 10.4% | 14.7% | 13.8% | 40.0% | 15.2% | 17.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $137M | $119M | $85M | $85M | $84M | $84M | $84M | $85M | $100M | $94M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SUN stock.
Sunoco LP's current P/E ratio is 20.5x. The historical average is 24.1x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.
Sunoco LP's current EV/EBITDA is 15.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.2x.
Sunoco LP's return on equity (ROE) is 8.7%. The historical average is 19.2%.
Based on historical data, Sunoco LP is trading at a P/E of 20.5x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sunoco LP's current dividend yield is 6.38% with a payout ratio of 124.7%.
Sunoco LP has 8.3% gross margin and 3.7% operating margin.
Sunoco LP's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 10.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Acquisition-driven leverage and margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Forward Multiple Suggests Market Skepticism
Sunoco's forward P/E of 8.49 versus trailing 19.63 implies the market expects earnings to nearly double, yet EV/EBITDA at 15.49 remains elevated relative to peers, per reported data.
The steep discount in forward P/E relative to trailing suggests the market is pricing in a significant earnings recovery, likely from the recent acquisition. However, the EV/EBITDA of 15.49 is well above the peer average of roughly 8.3, indicating that on an enterprise basis, the market is paying a premium for Sunoco's cash flows. This premium may be justified if the acquisition delivers the expected synergies, but it also leaves little room for error. Investors should monitor whether EBITDA growth materializes to support the current EV/EBITDA multiple.
Margin Compression Masks Underlying Earning Power
Gross margin fell to 10.3% in 2026Q2 from 13.6% in 2026Q1, while operating margin dropped to 4.1% from 8.6%, as per financial statements, indicating that the revenue surge came with thinner per-unit profitability.
The sequential decline in gross and operating margins suggests that the acquisition brought lower-margin fuel distribution volumes, diluting overall profitability. Net margin of 2.0% in 2026Q2 is thin, but the 2026Q1 net margin of 6.0% shows the potential for higher profitability when fuel margins are favorable. The volatility in margins across quarters indicates that Sunoco's earning power is highly sensitive to fuel price spreads and competitive dynamics. The true earning power may be better reflected in the average margin over a full cycle rather than any single quarter.
ROIC Volatility Reflects Acquisition Integration
ROIC swung from 4.3% in 2026Q1 to 2.8% in 2026Q2, and has been below 2% in several prior quarters, per reported figures, indicating that returns on invested capital are not yet compounding consistently.
The recent acquisition has temporarily depressed ROIC as the capital base expanded faster than operating income. The 2026Q2 ROIC of 2.8% is below the cost of capital, suggesting that the acquisition has not yet generated sufficient returns. However, the 2026Q1 ROIC of 4.3% and the 2024Q1 ROIC of 4.4% indicate that Sunoco can generate higher returns when margins are healthier. The key driver will be whether management can improve asset turnover and margins to lift ROIC above its cost of capital over the next few quarters.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves but Remains Tight
Cash conversion cycle improved to 24 days in 2026Q2 from 15 days in 2026Q1, per reported data, driven by a rise in DSO to 32 days, indicating that Sunoco is extending credit to customers.
The increase in DSO from 23 to 32 days suggests that Sunoco is offering more favorable payment terms to customers, possibly to support volume growth. DIO and DPO remained relatively stable, but the overall CCC of 24 days is still short, reflecting the low inventory requirements of the fuel distribution business. The efficiency of working capital management is adequate, but the rising DSO warrants monitoring as it could indicate collection risk or a deliberate strategy to gain market share. Asset turnover of 0.47 in 2026Q2 is low, reflecting the large asset base from the acquisition, but it may improve as revenue ramps up.
Leverage Spikes on Acquisition Financing
Debt-to-equity jumped to 1.78 in 2026Q2 from 0.18 in 2026Q1, while D/EBITDA reached 17.16, per balance sheet data, indicating a significant increase in financial leverage from the acquisition.
The dramatic increase in leverage is a direct result of the debt-funded acquisition, with D/EBITDA spiking to 17.16 in 2026Q2 from 1.24 in 2026Q1. This level is far above the peer average and raises concerns about debt service capacity, especially given the interest coverage ratio of 2.77, which is thin. The 2026Q1 D/EBITDA of 1.24 was unusually low, likely due to a temporary equity issuance, but the current level suggests that Sunoco is highly leveraged. Investors should monitor whether EBITDA grows sufficiently to reduce D/EBITDA to a more comfortable level, as refinancing risk could emerge if fuel margins remain compressed.
Liquidity Buffer Thins After Acquisition
Current ratio fell to 1.29 in 2026Q2 from 1.40 in 2026Q1, while quick ratio dropped to 0.83, per reported figures, indicating a tighter liquidity position post-acquisition.
The current ratio of 1.29 is still above 1.0, but the quick ratio of 0.83 suggests that Sunoco relies on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which is typical for a fuel distributor. The decline in liquidity ratios from the prior quarter reflects the cash outlay for the acquisition and the increase in current liabilities. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp drop in fuel prices, Sunoco's liquidity could be strained, but the company's access to credit lines and the low capital intensity of its business provide some cushion. The 2025Q3 current ratio of 3.11 was an outlier, likely due to a temporary cash build, so the current level is more representative of the post-acquisition reality.
EV/EBITDA Misleads in Acquisition Year
EV/EBITDA of 15.49 appears expensive, but the metric is distorted by the recent acquisition's EBITDA contribution, which may not yet reflect full synergies, per reported data.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Sunoco is EV/EBITDA, because the recent acquisition has temporarily inflated enterprise value while EBITDA has not yet caught up. The trailing EV/EBITDA of 15.49 overstates the company's true valuation, as it does not account for the expected EBITDA growth from the acquired assets. A more appropriate metric would be forward EV/EBITDA, which at 11.10 is still above peers but more reasonable. Alternatively, investors should consider EV/EBITDAR to normalize for the varying lease and maintenance capital structures in the fuel distribution industry. Using EV/EBITDA alone could lead to an incorrect conclusion that Sunoco is overvalued, when in fact the acquisition may create value over time.