Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.4x · EV/EBITDA 8.3x · ROE 18.5%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.3B | $1.9B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.1B | $369M | $373M | $809M | $249M | $262M | $385M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.5B | $1.1B | $931M | $1.6B | $1.5B | $973M | $893M | $1.8B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.36 | 5.29 | 3.43 | 3.32 | 4.61 | — | 4.28 | 38.05 | — | — | 5.65 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.44 | 1.95 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 0.86 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.73 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.61 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 1.11 | 0.99 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.82 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.41 |
| P/FCF | 29.08 | 16.49 | 3.48 | 2.80 | 5.94 | — | 1.13 | 7.63 | — | 3.50 | 1.92 |
| P/OCF | 10.71 | 6.07 | 2.93 | 2.76 | 5.47 | — | 1.07 | 6.87 | — | 3.29 | 1.83 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.14 | 0.76 | 1.06 | 1.23 | 1.79 | 1.01 | 1.87 | 1.73 | 3.00 | 2.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.29 | 3.59 | 1.97 | 2.42 | 4.00 | — | 3.45 | 7.12 | 10.38 | 12.68 | 6.56 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.62 | 3.09 | 2.26 | 2.79 | 5.31 | — | 4.21 | 13.91 | 84.09 | — | 12.81 |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.60 | 2.35 | 2.53 | 8.17 | — | 2.69 | 16.63 | — | 17.25 | 6.23 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 27.5% | 32.1% | 39.5% | 26.0% | -10.7% | 28.4% | 17.6% | 6.4% | 11.0% | 23.8% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 22.6% | 30.9% | 37.1% | 22.4% | -35.8% | 16.0% | 13.1% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 16.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 36.9% | 36.9% | 32.8% | 35.3% | 20.0% | -44.7% | 9.9% | 4.4% | -7.0% | -13.5% | 11.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.5% | 18.5% | 24.4% | 39.7% | 24.7% | -25.3% | 8.4% | 4.3% | -5.4% | -6.0% | 6.9% |
| ROA | 16.7% | 16.7% | 20.6% | 27.9% | 13.8% | -14.0% | 4.3% | 1.9% | -2.4% | -2.8% | 3.1% |
| ROIC | 12.5% | 12.5% | 21.2% | 28.8% | 13.6% | -9.6% | 6.0% | 4.7% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 3.5% |
| ROCE | 10.9% | 10.9% | 21.0% | 32.3% | 17.2% | -12.5% | 7.9% | 6.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 4.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 1.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 1.59 | — | 2.38 | 4.21 | 8.83 | 10.81 | 4.90 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.38 | -0.26 | -0.11 | 0.37 | 0.72 | 0.48 | 0.96 | 1.11 | 1.02 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.57 | -2.57 | -0.95 | -0.26 | 1.09 | — | 2.01 | 3.85 | 8.40 | 10.11 | 4.54 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -6.89 | -1.13 | -0.27 | 2.23 | — | 1.57 | 9.01 | — | 13.75 | 4.31 |
| Interest Coverage | 120.91 | 120.91 | 55.08 | 20.21 | 7.65 | -5.97 | 4.12 | 1.94 | 0.26 | -0.04 | 3.28 |
Net cash position: cash ($831M) exceeds total debt ($55M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.98 | 7.98 | 5.66 | 3.97 | 2.70 | 1.56 | 1.24 | 1.49 | 1.14 | 0.75 | 0.91 |
| Quick Ratio | 7.76 | 7.76 | 5.32 | 3.65 | 2.34 | 1.25 | 1.07 | 1.32 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.91 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.31 | 6.31 | 4.05 | 2.33 | 1.06 | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.29 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.42 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.27 |
| Inventory Turnover | 23.47 | 23.47 | 18.16 | 16.76 | 14.33 | 12.25 | 18.35 | 15.63 | 18.08 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 58.65 | 43.13 | 48.19 | 62.63 | 60.44 | 28.03 | 78.58 | 63.52 | 71.06 | 40.45 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 3.7% | 7.4% | 3.4% | — | — | — | — | 3.2% | 7.9% | 12.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 19.6% | 19.6% | 25.5% | 11.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 74.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 10.7% | 18.9% | 29.2% | 30.1% | 21.7% | — | 23.3% | 2.6% | — | — | 17.7% |
| FCF Yield | 3.4% | 6.1% | 28.7% | 35.7% | 16.8% | — | 88.9% | 13.1% | — | 28.6% | 52.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.1% | 3.7% | 7.4% | 3.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.2% | 7.9% | 16.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $35M | $35M | $35M | $34M | $34M | $34M | $34M | $34M | $23M | $21M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TNK stock.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 9.4x. The historical average is 10.2x. This places it at the 85th percentile of its historical range.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.3x.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 18.5%. The historical average is 11.9%.
Based on historical data, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 9.4x. This is at the 85th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s current dividend yield is 2.10% with a payout ratio of 19.6%.
Teekay Tankers Ltd. has 27.5% gross margin and 22.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Fleet age and rate volatility
Margin Expansion Masks Cyclicality
TNK's gross margin surged to 54.0% in 2026Q2 from 26.3% a year earlier, per financial statements, reflecting strong tanker rates, but net margin of 59.5% likely includes non-operating gains.
The sequential improvement in gross margin from 38.6% in 2025Q4 to 54.0% in 2026Q2 indicates a sharp cyclical upturn in spot rates, consistent with the revenue rebound. However, net margin exceeding operating margin by nearly 10 percentage points suggests non-operating items such as vessel sale gains are inflating bottom-line profitability. Investors should adjust for these one-time items to assess recurring earning power, as the trailing twelve-month revenue decline of 22.6% highlights the volatility inherent in this business.
ROIC Recovering from Cyclical Trough
ROIC climbed to 9.0% in 2026Q2 from 3.4% a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, but remains below the 2024Q1 peak of 7.9%, indicating a cyclical recovery rather than structural improvement.
The ten-quarter trend shows ROIC bottoming at 2.7% in 2025Q3 and rebounding sharply, driven by margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained low at 0.15. The near-zero debt amplifies ROE relative to ROIC, but the large cash balance of $831 million depresses returns on capital, as it earns minimal yield. Management's decision to hold cash rather than reinvest or distribute suggests a deliberate strategy to preserve flexibility for fleet renewal, but this creates a drag on shareholder returns if not deployed effectively.
Working Capital Turns Negative as Rates Rise
TNK's cash conversion cycle turned negative to -17 days in 2026Q2, per financial statements, as DPO of 58 days exceeded DSO and DIO, indicating strong supplier leverage and efficient cash collection.
The improvement in CCC from 62 days in 2025Q2 to -17 days in 2026Q2 reflects faster collections (DSO down to 24 days) and extended payables, likely due to higher charter revenues and negotiated terms. This negative CCC is a sign of working capital efficiency, but it is also a function of the cyclical rate environment; during downturns, DSO tends to lengthen as seen in 2025Q1 (55 days). Asset turnover remains low at 0.15, typical for capital-intensive shipping, but the efficiency gains in working capital provide a buffer against rate volatility.
Near-Zero Debt Eliminates Refinancing Risk
TNK's debt-to-equity ratio stands at 0.01 with interest coverage of 290.8x in 2026Q2, as per balance sheet data, virtually eliminating financial risk and providing a significant competitive advantage over leveraged peers.
The aggressive deleveraging over the past two years, reducing debt from $65.9 million to $27.8 million, has lowered the cash break-even rate, allowing TNK to withstand prolonged market downturns. This fortress balance sheet contrasts sharply with peers like Frontline (D/E 1.22) and Nordic American (D/E 0.95), positioning TNK to potentially acquire assets at cyclical lows. However, the $831 million cash hoard represents a significant opportunity cost, and investors should monitor whether management deploys it into fleet renewal or returns it to shareholders, as prolonged hoarding could signal a lack of attractive investment opportunities.
Liquidity Buffer Shields Against Rate Shocks
TNK's current ratio improved to 9.99 in 2026Q2 from 6.58 in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, with cash covering 27 times total debt, providing a substantial cushion against spot rate declines.
The quick ratio of 9.73 indicates that nearly all current assets are cash or receivables, with minimal inventory dependence, which is typical for a service-oriented shipping company. This liquidity position would allow TNK to fund operations for an extended period even if rates collapsed, as evidenced by the negative FCF margin in 2025Q3 (-23.3%) when rates were weak. The risk is that this cash pile may be needed for impending fleet renewal costs, as the aging fleet faces environmental regulations, but the current liquidity provides ample time to time the market.
P/E Misleads in Cyclical Shipping
TNK's trailing P/E of 9.01 appears cheap, but in cyclical shipping, low P/E often signals peak earnings, as per industry analysis; EV/EBITDA of 7.88 and P/B of 1.55 are more relevant.
The market commonly misapplies P/E to tanker companies, where earnings are highly volatile and current multiples may be distorted by the cyclical peak. TNK's forward P/E of 5.62 implies the market expects even higher earnings, which may be overly optimistic given the 22.6% revenue decline over the trailing twelve months. Instead, investors should focus on P/NAV, which reflects the market value of the fleet, and EV/EBITDA, which normalizes for capital structure. TNK's P/B of 1.55 suggests the market values the fleet at a premium to book, but this may not account for the aging vessels' lower second-hand values, warranting a mark-to-market analysis.