Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.5x · EV/EBITDA 12.2x · ROE 20.7%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $2.0B | $1.2B | $539M | $391M | $846M | $879M | $573M | $540M | $412M | $221M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.3B | $2.1B | $1.4B | $799M | $705M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $775M | $757M | $612M | $436M |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.45 | 34.86 | 28.08 | 13.09 | 33.80 | 14.99 | 26.68 | 41.45 | 21.27 | 20.32 | 8.22 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.53 | 4.38 | 3.23 | 1.66 | 1.22 | 1.90 | 2.17 | 1.58 | 1.62 | 1.44 | 1.07 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.05 | 5.46 | 6.11 | 3.54 | 3.44 | 6.32 | 7.48 | 5.38 | 6.53 | 7.73 | 6.48 |
| P/FCF | 26.72 | 46.31 | 18.64 | 8.81 | 17.29 | 13.63 | 23.42 | 17.38 | 49.87 | 14.90 | 37.27 |
| P/OCF | 20.42 | 35.39 | 17.35 | 8.05 | 12.90 | 12.40 | 20.13 | 15.16 | 41.23 | 13.89 | 24.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.57 | 3.82 | 2.46 | 2.19 | 2.58 | 2.89 | 2.14 | 2.28 | 2.14 | 2.11 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.24 | 20.60 | 14.93 | 9.48 | 8.53 | 12.04 | 16.86 | 24.75 | 14.67 | 11.80 | 9.72 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.20 | 19.50 | 15.60 | 9.45 | 11.44 | 12.26 | 17.47 | 14.66 | 16.32 | 13.96 | 10.47 |
| EV / FCF | — | 48.27 | 22.08 | 13.06 | 31.19 | 18.49 | 31.19 | 23.51 | 69.95 | 22.11 | 73.64 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.1% | 57.1% | 55.9% | 56.3% | 55.4% | 48.9% | 46.9% | 44.2% | 42.9% | 43.7% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 20.6% | 24.0% | 24.7% | 24.7% | 20.3% | 15.9% | 7.5% | 14.6% | 17.3% | 21.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.6% | 12.6% | 11.0% | 11.8% | 3.6% | 11.7% | 9.4% | 4.5% | 7.6% | 7.1% | 13.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 20.7% | 20.7% | 23.3% | 29.0% | 9.4% | 41.4% | 34.1% | 17.2% | 37.2% | 46.3% | 79.0% |
| ROA | 9.3% | 9.3% | 7.5% | 6.7% | 2.0% | 9.5% | 8.1% | 4.1% | 8.1% | 7.1% | 10.1% |
| ROIC | 16.6% | 16.6% | 15.9% | 14.3% | 13.8% | 16.0% | 13.5% | 6.7% | 13.2% | 14.8% | 14.2% |
| ROCE | 16.8% | 16.8% | 18.9% | 16.0% | 14.5% | 18.1% | 15.5% | 8.2% | 18.7% | 20.3% | 18.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.83 | 0.83 | 1.37 | 2.49 | 3.71 | 3.22 | 2.84 | 2.79 | 2.67 | 3.79 | 6.41 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.01 | 3.01 | 2.83 | 4.48 | 5.09 | 4.52 | 4.80 | 9.50 | 4.28 | 3.90 | 4.86 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.23 | 1.13 | 1.71 | 2.77 | 2.26 | 2.48 | 1.90 | 2.63 | 3.74 | 6.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.84 | 0.84 | 2.33 | 3.09 | 3.80 | 3.17 | 4.20 | 6.46 | 4.21 | 3.85 | 4.80 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.97 | 3.45 | 4.25 | 13.90 | 4.87 | 7.77 | 6.13 | 20.09 | 7.21 | 36.37 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.28 | 4.28 | 6.32 | 5.77 | 3.15 | 4.56 | 4.97 | 3.66 | 3.08 | 2.59 | 1.56 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.56 | 5.56 | 4.42 | 2.67 | 6.23 | 6.18 | 2.89 | 3.39 | 1.75 | 2.08 | 1.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.12 | 4.12 | 2.27 | 1.62 | 3.33 | 4.01 | 1.37 | 2.12 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.40 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.97 | 2.97 | 1.03 | 1.17 | 2.57 | 3.18 | 0.74 | 1.70 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 0.72 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.65 | 1.36 | 1.20 | 2.60 | 2.51 | 2.84 | 2.08 | 2.54 | 1.70 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 32.24 | 25.10 | 32.75 | 9.52 | 5.32 | 8.41 | 6.96 | 2.87 | 4.15 | 3.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 9.5% | 9.5% | 12.3% | 11.7% | 36.5% | 7.9% | 10.0% | 21.8% | 9.2% | 3.8% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.1% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 7.6% | 3.0% | 6.7% | 3.7% | 2.4% | 4.7% | 4.9% | 12.2% |
| FCF Yield | 3.7% | 2.2% | 5.4% | 11.4% | 5.8% | 7.3% | 4.3% | 5.8% | 2.0% | 6.7% | 2.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 7.5% | 4.6% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.5% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 8.6% | 5.1% | 1.6% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $19M | $19M | $20M | $18M | $22M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $18M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TPB stock.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 19.5x. The historical average is 24.3x. This places it at the 30th percentile of its historical range.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.3x.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 20.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 33.8%.
Based on historical data, Turning Point Brands, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 19.5x. This is at the 30th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.49% with a payout ratio of 9.5%.
Turning Point Brands, Inc. has 57.1% gross margin and 20.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
SG&A spike and EPS volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Masks Underlying Strength
According to the latest quarterly data, TPB's gross margin expanded to 65.5% in 2026Q2 from 57.1% a year earlier, yet operating margin fell to 11.7% from 22.6%, reflecting a temporary SG&A surge.
The gross margin improvement suggests enhanced pricing power or a favorable product mix shift, but the operating margin collapse to 11.7% in 2026Q2 from 22.6% in 2025Q2 is driven by an SG&A spike to $77.0M, which appears non-recurring. Net margin also dropped to 2.5% from 12.4% year-over-year, indicating that the true earning power is better reflected by gross margin and normalized operating margins, which remain above 20% in prior quarters. Investors should monitor whether SG&A reverts to historical levels, as the current margin profile is distorted by this one-time cost disruption.
Return on Capital Compressed by Equity Surge
As reported in the latest financials, TPB's ROIC fell to 2.6% in 2026Q2 from 4.8% a year earlier, while ROE dropped to 0.9% from 6.8%, as equity more than doubled to $430.1M.
The sharp decline in ROE and ROIC is not due to deteriorating operations but rather a rapid expansion of the equity base, which grew from $172.8M to $430.1M year-over-year, likely from a capital raise or retained earnings. This dilution of returns on capital suggests that the company is in a transition phase where new capital has not yet been deployed into high-return projects. The underlying asset turnover remains low at 0.18, indicating that the balance sheet is becoming more asset-heavy, but the gross margin expansion hints at potential for improved returns once the capital is fully utilized.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens on Inventory Build
Based on the quarterly ratio data, TPB's cash conversion cycle extended to 198 days in 2026Q2 from 172 days a year earlier, driven by a rise in days inventory outstanding to 243 from 191.
The increase in DIO from 191 to 243 days suggests that TPB is building inventory, possibly in anticipation of higher demand or due to supply chain disruptions. This lengthening of the cash conversion cycle, combined with a DSO of 21 days, indicates that the company is tying up more cash in inventory, which may strain liquidity if not managed carefully. However, the current ratio of 5.67 provides ample buffer, and the increase in DPO to 66 days from 48 suggests TPB is taking longer to pay suppliers, partially offsetting the inventory build. The efficiency trend warrants monitoring, as prolonged inventory holding could signal obsolescence risk in the tobacco industry.
Deleveraging Accelerates Despite Coverage Dip
According to the balance sheet data, TPB's debt-to-equity ratio fell to 0.65 in 2026Q2 from 1.36 a year earlier, while interest coverage dropped to 4.29 from 5.49, reflecting higher debt costs or lower operating income.
The dramatic reduction in leverage from 2.34 in 2024Q1 to 0.65 in 2026Q2 indicates a strategic deleveraging, likely funded by the equity raise and strong cash generation. However, interest coverage has declined from 5.49 to 4.29 over the same period, which may be due to higher interest rates or the SG&A spike reducing operating income. Despite the coverage dip, the current level remains comfortable, and the lower debt burden reduces refinancing risk. The D/EBITDA ratio of 16.13 in 2026Q2 is elevated, but this is distorted by the temporary margin compression; on a normalized basis, it would be closer to historical levels of around 10-12.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens to Fortress Levels
As per the latest quarterly data, TPB's current ratio improved to 5.67 in 2026Q2 from 4.22 a year earlier, with cash representing 31.4% of total assets, providing a substantial cushion against operational shocks.
The current ratio of 5.67 and quick ratio of 4.16 indicate that TPB has more than sufficient short-term assets to cover its liabilities, even if inventory becomes illiquid. The cash balance of $268.3M provides a significant buffer, which is particularly important given the volatility in operating cash flow, as seen in the swing from -$27.4M in 2026Q1 to +$26.2M in 2026Q2. This liquidity position suggests that TPB can weather short-term disruptions and also supports potential strategic initiatives, such as acquisitions or organic investments. However, the high cash balance may also indicate that the company is not deploying capital efficiently, which could weigh on returns.
P/E Misleading Due to Earnings Volatility
The most commonly misapplied ratio for TPB is the trailing P/E of 27.89, which is distorted by the 77.2% drop in EPS in 2026Q2, making forward P/E of 65.71 more reflective of expected earnings normalization.
The trailing P/E is based on depressed earnings due to the SG&A spike and tax items, which are not indicative of the company's ongoing earning power. The forward P/E of 65.71 appears high, but it likely reflects analyst expectations of a rebound in earnings as the one-time costs fade. A more appropriate valuation metric for TPB would be EV/EBITDA, which at 17.19 is closer to peer levels, or EV/Sales, which at 3.63 is reasonable for a growth-oriented tobacco company. Investors should adjust for non-recurring items and use normalized earnings to assess the true valuation, as the P/E ratio is currently misleading.