Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.2x · EV/EBITDA 11.9x · ROE 197.1%. (2000–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22.3B | $30.7B | $19.4B | $10.0B | $10.3B | $8.2B | $12.3B | $3.7B | $9.2B | $13.5B | $13.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $25.3B | $33.7B | $22.2B | $12.6B | $12.9B | $10.7B | $13.7B | $6.8B | $9.9B | $13.8B | $12.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.20 | 20.08 | 106.23 | 12.23 | 11.03 | 9.63 | 14.74 | — | 14.36 | 33.85 | 22.65 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.79 | 3.83 | 2.76 | 1.50 | 1.55 | 1.23 | 2.14 | 0.75 | 1.53 | 2.29 | 2.98 |
| P/B Ratio | 33.56 | 44.34 | 22.59 | 3.44 | 4.53 | 3.61 | 3.78 | 1.63 | 2.63 | 4.15 | 4.46 |
| P/FCF | 12.32 | 16.93 | 17.72 | 8.70 | 13.06 | 10.86 | 10.19 | 18.35 | 17.83 | 18.48 | 23.46 |
| P/OCF | 11.29 | 15.51 | 15.93 | 7.95 | 10.59 | 9.66 | 9.30 | 9.09 | 11.65 | 13.53 | 15.68 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.21 | 3.16 | 1.89 | 1.94 | 1.60 | 2.39 | 1.36 | 1.64 | 2.35 | 2.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.87 | 15.79 | 34.66 | 9.20 | 9.23 | 7.75 | 11.57 | — | 9.06 | 14.84 | 12.29 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.22 | 17.57 | 73.57 | 11.08 | 11.01 | 9.69 | 14.18 | — | 12.03 | 13.93 | 15.61 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.58 | 20.28 | 10.99 | 16.30 | 14.11 | 11.37 | 33.50 | 19.05 | 18.96 | 21.54 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 77.8% | 75.4% | 73.3% | 70.8% | 69.6% | 71.0% | 65.3% | 67.3% | 65.5% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 23.9% | 5.9% | 17.1% | 17.6% | 17.6% | 16.8% | -11.1% | 13.6% | 11.4% | 17.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 19.1% | 19.1% | 2.6% | 12.2% | 14.1% | 12.8% | 14.5% | -13.1% | 10.7% | 6.8% | 13.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 197.1% | 197.1% | 9.8% | 31.5% | 41.0% | 30.9% | 30.1% | -22.5% | 19.0% | 12.7% | 20.8% |
| ROA | 23.0% | 23.0% | 1.8% | 8.0% | 13.0% | 10.9% | 10.2% | -8.8% | 9.5% | 6.4% | 11.0% |
| ROIC | 39.2% | 39.2% | 6.8% | 16.5% | 18.3% | 18.7% | 14.5% | -8.7% | 15.9% | 18.3% | 28.5% |
| ROCE | 38.0% | 38.0% | 5.0% | 13.0% | 20.2% | 18.4% | 14.7% | -9.1% | 14.0% | 12.4% | 17.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 5.71 | 5.71 | 4.55 | 3.03 | 1.45 | 1.43 | 1.05 | 1.97 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.53 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.85 | 1.85 | 6.09 | 6.40 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.90 | — | 1.47 | 1.72 | 1.58 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.30 | 3.26 | 0.91 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 0.44 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 0.11 | -0.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.40 | 1.40 | 4.37 | 1.92 | 1.84 | 1.79 | 1.20 | — | 0.58 | 0.38 | -1.09 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.64 | 2.56 | 2.29 | 3.24 | 3.26 | 1.18 | 15.15 | 1.22 | 0.48 | -1.92 |
| Interest Coverage | 34.71 | 34.71 | 3.53 | 9.10 | 42.42 | 18.84 | 13.57 | -9.39 | 17.11 | 13.42 | 27.73 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.87 | 5.14 | 1.84 | 1.75 | 2.37 | 1.47 | 2.79 | 2.59 | 5.24 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.31 | 4.66 | 1.12 | 1.08 | 1.85 | 1.04 | 1.94 | 1.87 | 4.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 4.21 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 1.41 | 0.82 | 1.34 | 1.33 | 4.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.20 | 1.07 | 0.50 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.77 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.00 | 2.16 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 2.27 | 2.34 | 2.54 | 3.01 | 3.00 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 23.09 | 26.90 | 25.41 | 24.25 | 25.64 | 28.89 | 17.60 | 21.43 | 19.50 | 25.17 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.5% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 3.2% | — | 10.3% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 21.3% | 21.3% | 163.4% | 39.4% | 30.3% | 30.9% | — | — | 60.7% | 96.6% | 64.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.6% | 5.0% | 0.9% | 8.2% | 9.1% | 10.4% | 6.8% | — | 7.0% | 3.0% | 4.4% |
| FCF Yield | 8.1% | 5.9% | 5.6% | 11.5% | 7.7% | 9.2% | 9.8% | 5.4% | 5.6% | 5.4% | 4.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 7.0% | 5.1% | 10.4% | 0.0% | 6.8% | 19.4% | 0.0% | 8.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.4% | 6.1% | 12.0% | 3.2% | 9.6% | 22.6% | 0.0% | 18.4% | 5.3% | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $210M | $223M | $233M | $241M | $270M | $283M | $279M | $291M | $289M | $283M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TPR stock.
Tapestry, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 15.2x. The historical average is 24.9x. This places it at the 32th percentile of its historical range.
Tapestry, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.1x.
Tapestry, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 197.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 38.3%.
Based on historical data, Tapestry, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 15.2x. This is at the 32th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Tapestry, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.40% with a payout ratio of 21.3%.
Tapestry, Inc. has 77.8% gross margin and 23.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Tapestry, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.9x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Elevated leverage constraining flexibility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Discounted for Leverage and China Risk
Tapestry trades at a forward P/E of 17.93 and EV/EBITDA of 13.73, a significant discount to Ralph Lauren's 23.43 P/E and 16.00 EV/EBITDA, suggesting the market is pricing in its elevated leverage and greater exposure to volatile Chinese consumer demand.
The valuation discount appears justified given the company's debt-to-equity ratio of 5.71 versus Ralph Lauren's 1.05, which introduces meaningful refinancing risk and interest expense drag. However, the PEG ratio of 0.87 indicates the market may be underappreciating the acceleration in earnings growth, which has been driven by the successful brand elevation strategy at Coach. Investors should monitor whether the discount narrows as the company executes on its deleveraging plan or if it persists due to perceived structural risks.
Gross Margin Surge Masks Underlying SG&A Pressure
Gross margin expanded dramatically to 83.3% in 2026Q4, a significant jump from the 74.7% level in 2024Q3, indicating a powerful shift in product mix and pricing discipline that is the primary driver of the recent profitability surge.
This gross margin expansion is the most critical trend, suggesting the Coach brand's elevation strategy is successfully reducing promotional activity and increasing full-price sell-through. However, the operating margin of 23.6% in the latest quarter, while strong, is still heavily burdened by a high fixed-cost SG&A base, which remains at 57.9% of revenue. The net margin of 18.5% appears artificially inflated by the recovery from prior one-time charges, and the underlying structural profitability of the business is best reflected in the gross margin trend, which warrants close monitoring for sustainability.
ROIC Recovery Driven by Margin, Not Efficiency
Return on Invested Capital has recovered sharply to 9.2% in 2026Q4 from a negative -10.6% in 2025Q4, a turnaround driven almost entirely by the surge in operating margins rather than improvements in asset turnover, which remains low at 0.29.
The ROIC recovery is impressive but appears fragile, as it is not supported by a corresponding improvement in capital efficiency. The asset turnover ratio of 0.29 is significantly lower than historical levels, suggesting the company's asset base has not yet been fully optimized following the balance sheet restructuring. This implies the current return profile is highly sensitive to any reversal in the gross margin trend, and true capital compounding will require a sustained improvement in how effectively the company utilizes its assets to generate sales.
Leverage Remains a Structural Constraint
Despite a recent reduction, the debt-to-equity ratio remains elevated at 5.71, which is dramatically higher than peer Ralph Lauren's 1.05 and suggests the company's capital structure continues to limit strategic flexibility and amplify risk in a higher-rate environment.
The interest coverage ratio of 36.13 in the latest quarter appears comfortable, but this is a function of the current earnings surge and masks the underlying risk of the high debt load. The prior quarter's D/E of 10.51 indicates the company has been actively deleveraging, but the absolute level of debt remains a material constraint. This leverage profile makes the company highly sensitive to any deterioration in operating performance, particularly in its key China market, and could pressure credit ratings or force a reduction in shareholder returns if cash flows weaken.
Working Capital Volatility Driven by Inventory
The cash conversion cycle has improved to 111 days in 2026Q4 from 129 days in 2024Q3, primarily driven by a reduction in days inventory outstanding to 243 days, though this remains significantly elevated and indicates substantial capital tied up in stock.
The improvement in the CCC is a positive signal, suggesting better inventory management and reduced fashion risk. However, the DIO of 243 days is still very high for a consumer goods company, indicating a significant amount of working capital is locked in inventory, which could become a liability if consumer demand softens. The company's ability to negotiate favorable payment terms with suppliers, as seen in the DPO of 157 days, partially offsets this, but the overall efficiency profile remains a key area for monitoring, especially given the cyclical nature of the luxury goods industry.
The Misleading Power of Gross Margin
The single most commonly misapplied ratio for Tapestry is the gross margin, which at 83.3% appears exceptionally strong but obscures the true cost of maintaining brand exclusivity through a high fixed-cost SG&A structure and significant marketing spend.
Investors often focus on the industry-leading gross margin as a sign of pricing power, but this metric fails to capture the substantial operating leverage and the high cost of customer acquisition in the digital channel. A more appropriate metric to assess true earning power is the operating margin, which at 23.6% is more reflective of the business's actual profitability after accounting for the necessary investments to sustain the brand. The gross margin can be misleading because it does not account for the significant SG&A required to drive sales, making it a poor standalone indicator of financial health for a company with Tapestry's cost structure.