Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.2x · EV/EBITDA 3.2x · ROE 11.5%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $351M | $265M | $245M | $224M | $232M | $244M | $152M | $233M | $235M | $231M | $112M |
| Enterprise Value | $123M | $37M | $91M | $116M | $-105783787 | $-357277776 | $-215762252 | $12M | $23M | $40M | $-20031753 |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.21 | 9.07 | 10.05 | 8.24 | 9.80 | 8.84 | 6.25 | 9.68 | 14.07 | 16.32 | 11.01 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.17 | 2.40 | 2.41 | 2.56 | 3.44 | 3.56 | 2.17 | 3.49 | 4.56 | 4.82 | 2.59 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.36 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.06 | 1.18 | 0.81 | 1.36 | 1.89 | 2.08 | 1.16 |
| P/FCF | 12.34 | 9.31 | 11.26 | 7.48 | 9.06 | 8.49 | 4.76 | 14.59 | 12.21 | 22.38 | 10.14 |
| P/OCF | 11.63 | 8.78 | 10.62 | 7.21 | 8.75 | 8.23 | 4.48 | 12.86 | 10.96 | 16.69 | 9.47 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.34 | 0.90 | 1.34 | -1.57 | -5.21 | -3.09 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.83 | -0.46 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.18 | 0.96 | 2.76 | 3.18 | -3.26 | -9.54 | -6.51 | 0.35 | 0.95 | 1.74 | -1.18 |
| EV / EBIT | 3.40 | 1.02 | 3.00 | 3.43 | -3.58 | -10.38 | -7.14 | 0.38 | 1.03 | 1.89 | -1.33 |
| EV / FCF | — | 1.31 | 4.20 | 3.90 | -4.13 | -12.43 | -6.77 | 0.72 | 1.19 | 3.88 | -1.82 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | 70.1% | 68.6% | 84.3% | 95.8% | 95.6% | 87.6% | 93.2% | 94.6% | 95.9% | 90.6% |
| Operating Margin | 32.8% | 32.8% | 29.9% | 39.0% | 43.9% | 50.2% | 43.4% | 44.8% | 43.5% | 44.2% | 34.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 26.4% | 26.4% | 23.9% | 31.1% | 35.1% | 40.2% | 34.8% | 36.0% | 32.4% | 29.5% | 23.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.5% | 11.5% | 10.1% | 12.0% | 11.1% | 14.0% | 13.5% | 16.2% | 14.2% | 13.6% | 10.9% |
| ROA | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| ROIC | 9.8% | 9.8% | 8.5% | 10.4% | 10.2% | 12.5% | 12.2% | 15.2% | 14.3% | 13.4% | 8.7% |
| ROCE | 13.0% | 13.0% | 11.2% | 13.7% | 13.4% | 16.4% | 16.1% | 19.9% | 18.8% | 17.7% | 11.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.07 | — | — | — | 0.31 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 1.01 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.38 | — | — | — | 1.77 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.87 | -0.62 | -0.46 | -1.54 | -2.91 | -1.96 | -1.29 | -1.70 | -1.72 | -1.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -5.88 | -5.88 | -4.65 | -2.92 | -10.42 | -16.05 | -11.09 | -6.79 | -8.77 | -8.32 | -7.79 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -8.01 | -7.06 | -3.58 | -13.19 | -20.92 | -11.53 | -13.87 | -11.01 | -18.51 | -11.96 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.99 | 2.93 | 11.06 | 11.09 | 6.43 | 6.56 | 8.03 | 6.65 | 3.70 |
Net cash position: cash ($251M) exceeds total debt ($23M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.3% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 3.1% | 3.5% | 4.7% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 27.7% | 27.7% | 31.5% | 30.5% | 30.6% | 31.1% | 29.2% | 27.0% | 26.5% | 25.7% | 25.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.2% | 11.0% | 9.9% | 12.1% | 10.2% | 11.3% | 16.0% | 10.3% | 7.1% | 6.1% | 9.1% |
| FCF Yield | 8.1% | 10.7% | 8.9% | 13.4% | 11.0% | 11.8% | 21.0% | 6.9% | 8.2% | 4.5% | 9.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.6% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 2.0% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.9% | 5.2% | 5.6% | 5.9% | 5.1% | 3.7% | 5.5% | 3.0% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 3.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $7M | $7M |
Regional housing market concentration
According to recent market data, TSBK trades at a P/B of 1.36, which suggests that investors are assigning a premium to the bank's localized deposit franchise compared to peers like HarborOne Bancorp, despite the bank's relatively modest return on equity performance over the last ten quarters.
The current P/B multiple appears to price TSBK as a stable, income-oriented franchise rather than a high-growth commercial lender. Investors should monitor whether this valuation remains sustainable if the return on tangible equity does not show meaningful expansion from current levels.
Based on reported financial figures, TSBK's ROE has remained within a narrow range of 2.4% to 3.3% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the bank's profitability is currently constrained by low asset utilization and a modest net interest margin of 0.9% across the period.
The DuPont decomposition suggests that the bank's profitability is heavily reliant on its low-cost funding base rather than aggressive leverage or high-margin non-interest income. This profile implies that significant ROE improvement may require a shift toward higher-yielding assets or a more efficient deployment of its capital base.
As reported in quarterly filings, TSBK maintained an efficiency ratio between 36.7% and 40.5% over the last ten quarters, demonstrating that management is successfully leveraging its branch network to control non-interest expenses despite the challenges of a competitive Pacific Northwest financial services landscape.
The stability of the efficiency ratio suggests that the bank's brick-and-mortar model remains productive, though investors should monitor for any upward drift that might indicate rising personnel or technology costs. Maintaining this discipline is critical given the bank's reliance on a narrow net interest margin.
According to recent regulatory filings, TSBK has maintained a consistent equity-to-assets ratio of 0.13 throughout the last ten quarters, providing a robust capital buffer that supports the bank's conservative risk profile and its ongoing commitment to shareholder capital returns through dividends and share repurchases.
This consistent capital level suggests that the bank is well-positioned to absorb potential credit volatility within its construction-heavy loan portfolio. The lack of significant leverage expansion indicates a management preference for balance sheet safety over aggressive growth, which may limit upside in favorable economic cycles.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to TSBK, as it fails to account for the volatility introduced by the provision for credit losses and the cyclical nature of mortgage-related income, which can significantly distort the bank's reported earnings in any given quarter.
Investors should instead focus on P/TBV and core net interest income trends to better assess the underlying value of the bank's deposit franchise. Relying on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the bank's earnings power, particularly when provisioning levels fluctuate based on management's subjective economic outlook.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TSBK stock.
Timberland Bancorp, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 12.2x. The historical average is 12.4x. This places it at the 56th percentile of its historical range.
Timberland Bancorp, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 3.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.3x.
Timberland Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 11.5%. The historical average is 8.9%.
Based on historical data, Timberland Bancorp, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 12.2x. This is at the 56th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Timberland Bancorp, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.27% with a payout ratio of 27.7%.
Timberland Bancorp, Inc. has 70.1% gross margin and 32.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Timberland Bancorp, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.6x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.