Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -71.2%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $295M | $512M | $365M | $400M | $254M | $239M | $132M | $94M | $99M | $101M | $75M |
| Enterprise Value | $240M | $456M | $290M | $347M | $232M | $205M | $141M | $99M | $107M | $116M | $98M |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.74 | 1367.20 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 8.42 | 18.82 | 10.84 | 22.65 | 13345.86 | 14921.50 | 15.83 | 2.92 | 4.19 | 2.63 | 2.76 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.53 | 6.61 | 2.75 | 5.35 | 4.06 | 3.44 | 3.86 | 2.12 | 1.90 | 2.60 | 2.08 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.39 | — | 18.58 | 24.83 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.60 | — | 17.93 | 22.63 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 16.78 | 8.62 | 19.65 | 12191.81 | 12805.94 | 16.90 | 3.07 | 4.55 | 3.03 | 3.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.76 | 17.11 | 16.44 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 81.74 | 83.93 | 360.89 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.69 | — | 21.45 | 32.20 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.3% | 0.3% | -26.6% | -9.5% | -36010.5% | -43650.0% | -55.9% | 6.1% | 48.1% | 36.4% | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | -255.0% | -255.0% | -187.2% | -174.5% | -104178.9% | -104731.3% | -160.4% | -25.7% | 5.6% | 3.6% | 1.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -275.3% | -275.3% | -157.8% | -173.4% | -90210.5% | -143362.5% | -177.8% | -26.1% | 19.3% | 0.2% | -11.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -71.2% | -71.2% | -51.2% | -44.6% | -26.0% | -44.3% | -37.7% | -17.5% | 10.0% | 0.2% | -8.8% |
| ROA | -32.1% | -32.1% | -33.0% | -25.9% | -15.0% | -22.6% | -17.2% | -8.8% | 4.8% | 0.1% | -3.2% |
| ROIC | -130.4% | -130.4% | -118.7% | -74.3% | -39.0% | -32.0% | -21.7% | -11.4% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.3% |
| ROCE | -33.1% | -33.1% | -43.0% | -28.1% | -18.3% | -17.4% | -16.0% | -9.1% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 0.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.66 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.99 | 2.86 | 4.02 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.72 | -0.56 | -0.71 | -0.35 | -0.49 | 0.26 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.40 | 0.62 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.69 | 2.29 | 3.76 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.30 | — | 2.87 | 7.37 |
| Interest Coverage | -37.47 | -37.47 | -158.30 | — | -36.02 | -30.29 | -19.82 | -11.60 | 1.30 | 1.01 | 0.14 |
Net cash position: cash ($124M) exceeds total debt ($68M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.44 | 5.44 | 5.99 | 6.35 | 6.66 | 7.81 | 1.42 | 3.64 | 1.21 | 1.16 | 0.79 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.56 | 4.56 | 4.91 | 6.09 | 5.16 | 7.81 | 1.42 | 3.64 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 0.29 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.48 | 4.48 | 3.95 | 5.95 | 5.00 | 7.42 | 1.19 | 3.24 | 0.85 | 0.49 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.43 | 0.30 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.12 | 1.12 | 2.06 | 7.53 | 0.69 | — | — | — | 6.63 | 5.40 | 3.86 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 9.50 | 182.63 | 1.59 | 153.68 | 91.25 | — | 0.25 | 0.48 | 0.31 | 0.21 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.6% | 0.1% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.9% | — | 5.4% | 4.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $368M | $318M | $260M | $220M | $196M | $164M | $160M | $152M | $148M | $142M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying URG stock.
Ur-Energy Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -3.3x. The historical average is 21.7x.
Ur-Energy Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -71.2%. The historical average is -23.8%.
Based on historical data, Ur-Energy Inc. is trading at a P/E of -3.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ur-Energy Inc. has 0.3% gross margin and -255.0% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Debt-funded operational burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Structural Margin Collapse Under Fixed Costs
Operating margins have deteriorated to -128.3% in 2026Q2, as reported in recent financial statements, indicating that the company's high fixed-cost structure is overwhelming its volatile and insufficient gross profit generation.
The extreme negative operating leverage is evident, with operating losses consistently dwarfing gross profit, such as the -$18.4M operating loss on just $1.9M of gross profit in 2026Q2. This suggests the business model is currently incapable of covering its overhead at the present revenue scale, a structural issue that gross margin improvements alone cannot resolve.
Persistent Value Destruction on Invested Capital
Return on Invested Capital has been deeply negative for ten consecutive quarters, reaching -37.3% in 2026Q2 according to the provided data, signaling a sustained and severe destruction of shareholder value from the company's asset base.
The consistently negative ROIC, which has ranged from -22.1% to -59.7% over the past two years, indicates that the company's investments in property, plant, and equipment are not generating any positive economic returns. This trend implies that the ongoing capital expenditure cycle is not yet translating into productive, value-creating operations.
Rapid Leverage Buildup to Fund Cash Burn
The debt-to-equity ratio has surged from 0.01 to 1.03 over the past two years, as shown in the balance sheet data, marking a fundamental shift from a cash-rich position to one reliant on debt financing to sustain operations.
This rapid accumulation of debt, with total debt reaching $71.2M, appears to be directly funding the company's persistent negative operating cash flow and capital expenditures. The negative interest coverage ratio of -5.05 in 2026Q2 suggests that operating losses are now insufficient to cover interest expenses, increasing refinancing risk and covenant pressure.
Erratic Working Capital and Low Asset Turnover
Asset turnover remains extremely low at 0.05 in 2026Q2, per the ratio data, while the cash conversion cycle has been highly volatile, indicating significant inefficiency in converting invested capital into sales and managing working capital.
The combination of a low asset turnover and a volatile cash conversion cycle, which swung from 8 days to 589 days over the period, points to unpredictable operational execution and potential challenges in inventory management and collections. This inefficiency exacerbates the cash burn, as capital is tied up in unproductive assets for extended periods.
The Misleading Current Ratio
The current ratio of 4.00 in 2026Q2, based on reported figures, is a commonly misapplied metric that obscures the company's true liquidity risk by ignoring the composition of current assets and the pace of cash consumption.
For a pre-revenue or early-stage industrial company like Ur-Energy, the current ratio is misleading because it includes large balances of inventory and other non-cash current assets that may not be readily convertible to cash. A more appropriate metric is the cash burn rate relative to the remaining cash balance, which reveals that the company's operational model is consuming its liquid reserves at an alarming rate, regardless of the headline ratio.