Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 32.7x · EV/EBITDA 23.9x · ROE N/A. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.1B | $22.5B | $20.3B | $21.3B | $22.2B | $28.5B | $25.0B | $22.9B | $18.2B | $14.2B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $27.6B | $24.0B | $21.9B | $22.9B | $23.6B | $30.0B | $26.3B | $24.2B | $19.6B | $16.2B | $11.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 32.73 | 27.58 | 25.87 | 26.07 | 32.92 | 36.26 | 30.61 | 37.41 | 31.22 | 31.10 | 22.24 |
| P/S Ratio | 15.73 | 13.58 | 13.05 | 14.28 | 15.57 | 21.45 | 19.72 | 18.61 | 14.97 | 12.20 | 8.58 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 24.40 | 21.06 | 23.24 | 26.38 | 27.61 | 37.75 | 36.33 | 32.12 | 27.53 | 21.75 | 19.66 |
| P/OCF | 23.89 | 20.62 | 22.52 | 24.97 | 26.70 | 35.27 | 34.17 | 30.41 | 26.07 | 20.22 | 14.67 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 14.48 | 14.07 | 15.32 | 16.57 | 22.62 | 20.82 | 19.65 | 16.15 | 13.87 | 10.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.91 | 20.82 | 20.01 | 21.90 | 23.85 | 32.83 | 30.26 | 28.40 | 24.05 | 21.32 | 15.35 |
| EV / EBIT | 24.58 | 21.04 | 19.98 | 21.75 | 24.71 | 34.70 | 31.35 | 28.50 | 23.33 | 22.07 | 16.48 |
| EV / FCF | — | 22.45 | 25.06 | 28.31 | 29.38 | 39.83 | 38.36 | 33.92 | 29.69 | 24.73 | 22.95 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 88.2% | 88.2% | 87.7% | 86.8% | 85.9% | 85.5% | 85.8% | 85.3% | 84.2% | 83.4% | 82.6% |
| Operating Margin | 67.7% | 67.7% | 67.9% | 67.0% | 66.2% | 65.3% | 65.2% | 65.5% | 63.2% | 60.7% | 60.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 49.8% | 49.8% | 50.4% | 54.8% | 47.3% | 59.1% | 64.4% | 49.7% | 47.9% | 39.2% | 38.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | 60.4% | 60.4% | 49.8% | 47.0% | 36.3% | 41.8% | 45.0% | 32.5% | 24.0% | 17.3% | 18.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | 865.7% | 422.1% | 16055.9% | — | 158.5% | 94.9% | 102.5% |
| ROCE | — | — | 485.5% | 170.0% | 123.6% | 102.7% | 98.9% | 86.9% | 65.4% | 64.5% | 82.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.65 | 1.72 | 1.81 | 1.95 | 2.06 | 2.10 | 2.19 | 3.18 | 2.51 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.46 | 1.49 | 1.44 | 1.71 | 1.60 | 1.51 | 1.75 | 2.57 | 2.20 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.39 | 1.82 | 1.93 | 1.77 | 2.07 | 2.03 | 1.80 | 2.16 | 2.98 | 3.28 |
| Interest Coverage | 14.81 | 14.81 | 14.57 | 13.97 | 12.69 | 10.40 | 9.32 | 9.37 | 7.32 | 5.37 | 6.00 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.18 | 1.23 | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.57 | 1.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.18 | 1.23 | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.57 | 1.21 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 1.12 | 1.18 | 1.26 | 1.34 | 1.55 | 1.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.25 | 1.11 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.49 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 3.28 | 1.83 | 3.32 | 2.07 | 3.56 | 2.37 | 5.14 | 3.15 | 3.59 | 4.17 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 1.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 26.1% | 26.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.1% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 3.8% | 3.0% | 2.8% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 4.7% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 3.6% | 2.6% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.6% | 4.6% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.4% | 4.0% | 6.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 3.4% | 3.5% | 4.4% | 6.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.2% | 4.9% | 6.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 3.4% | 3.5% | 4.4% | 6.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $93M | $98M | $104M | $108M | $112M | $115M | $119M | $123M | $124M | $129M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VRSN stock.
VeriSign, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 32.7x. The historical average is 27.2x. This places it at the 75th percentile of its historical range.
VeriSign, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 23.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.9x.
Based on historical data, VeriSign, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 32.7x. This is at the 75th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
VeriSign, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.81% with a payout ratio of 26.1%.
VeriSign, Inc. has 88.2% gross margin and 67.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
VeriSign, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory threat to monopoly
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Utility-Like Margin Stability
Gross margin held at 88.5% in Q2 2026, with operating margin at 68.2%, reflecting the low variable cost structure of the registry business, as reported in the latest quarterly filing.
The consistency of gross margin around 88% across the past ten quarters underscores the toll-booth nature of the registry, where incremental registrations carry near-zero marginal cost. Operating margin has remained tightly range-bound between 66.7% and 68.9%, suggesting that the company has reached a plateau in operating leverage—revenue growth is not translating into proportionally higher margins. Net margin, however, has been more volatile, dipping to 48.4% in Q4 2024 and peaking at 51.5% in Q3 2024, likely due to timing of tax items or one-off gains, but the underlying earning power appears stable and highly predictable.
Negative Equity Distorts Returns
ROE is uninformative due to negative shareholders' equity of -$2.3B, but ROA improved to 14.0% in Q2 2026 from 11.2% in Q1 2024, as per balance sheet data, indicating efficient asset use.
The aggressive share repurchase program has driven equity deeply negative, making ROE a meaningless metric for VRSN. ROA, however, has shown a steady upward trend from 11.2% in Q1 2024 to 14.0% in Q2 2026, reflecting both margin stability and modest asset growth. This suggests that the company is generating increasing returns on its asset base, which is dominated by cash and deferred revenue rather than physical infrastructure. Investors should focus on ROIC, though it is not reported; given the asset-light model and high margins, ROIC is likely well above the cost of capital, but the negative equity complicates traditional capital efficiency analysis.
Working Capital Efficiency Hides Timing
DSO remains minimal at 3-4 days, while DPO averages around 20 days, resulting in a negative cash conversion cycle, as per quarterly data, indicating strong cash collection and supplier leverage.
The cash conversion cycle is consistently negative because the company collects cash upfront for multi-year registrations, as evidenced by deferred revenue of $1.5B, while paying suppliers on standard terms. DSO of 3-4 days is exceptionally low, reflecting the wholesale nature of the business where registrars pay promptly. DPO has fluctuated between 16 and 24 days, but the overall working capital profile is a source of cash, not a drain. The negative CCC is a structural advantage that supports the robust free cash flow margin, which has ranged from 39% to 72% over the past ten quarters, though the volatility is largely due to timing of buybacks and tax payments.
Leverage Creep Amid Cash Build
Total debt rose to $2.3B in Q2 2026 from $1.8B a year earlier, while cash nearly tripled to $840.9M, per the latest balance sheet, suggesting a deliberate shift toward liquidity.
The D/EBITDA ratio has deteriorated from 6.68 in Q1 2024 to 7.73 in Q2 2026, indicating that debt is growing faster than EBITDA. However, interest coverage remains comfortable at 15.43, up from 14.51 in Q1 2024, as the company has likely locked in low fixed rates. The increase in cash to $840.9M provides a buffer, but the negative equity of -$2.3B means that traditional leverage metrics are distorted. The debt-funded buyback strategy appears to be continuing, with cumulative buybacks exceeding free cash flow by $100M over the past ten quarters, as per cash flow statements, which warrants monitoring for refinancing risk if rates remain elevated.
Thin Current Ratio, Strong Cash Flow
Current ratio improved to 0.59 in Q2 2026 from 0.46 in Q1 2026, but remains below 1.0, as per balance sheet data, indicating reliance on operating cash flow for near-term obligations.
The current ratio has consistently been below 1.0, which would typically signal liquidity stress, but for VRSN this is misleading because the company generates substantial recurring cash flow and has access to capital markets. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, as inventory is negligible, and the improvement in Q2 2026 is driven by the cash build. The company's ability to service its debt and fund buybacks is not dependent on liquidating current assets but on its steady cash generation. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a regulatory shock, the cash buffer of $840.9M provides a cushion, but the reliance on debt markets for refinancing could become a constraint if credit conditions tighten.
Misapplied ROE in Negative Equity
ROE is the most misapplied ratio for VRSN because negative shareholders' equity of -$2.3B makes the metric meaningless, as reported in the balance sheet, obscuring true capital efficiency.
Traditional ROE calculations are distorted by the company's aggressive buyback program, which has driven equity negative. Analysts should instead use ROIC or ROA, which are based on operating assets and avoid the equity distortion. ROA has been steadily improving, reaching 14.0% in Q2 2026, and this is a more reliable indicator of earning power. Additionally, the negative equity masks the true leverage of the business; D/EBITDA of 7.73 is a more informative measure of debt burden. Investors should focus on cash flow metrics like FCF margin and interest coverage, which better reflect the company's ability to service debt and return capital.