Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 55.3x · EV/EBITDA 35.2x · ROE 16.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.5B | $20.0B | $24.1B | $26.5B | $17.8B | $35.8B | $21.5B | $11.3B | $7.4B | $7.5B | $6.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $26.1B | $19.6B | $24.0B | $26.0B | $17.3B | $35.3B | $21.2B | $11.2B | $7.3B | $7.4B | $6.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 55.29 | 40.46 | 48.96 | 44.69 | 30.45 | 54.10 | 61.99 | 46.83 | 35.78 | 49.58 | 44.41 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.61 | 6.51 | 8.35 | 8.98 | 6.18 | 12.64 | 10.00 | 6.15 | 4.30 | 4.67 | 4.22 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.61 | 6.30 | 9.00 | 9.20 | 6.64 | 15.32 | 11.58 | 7.20 | 5.29 | 5.84 | 5.69 |
| P/FCF | 56.43 | 42.66 | 87.34 | 63.97 | 40.60 | 108.24 | 72.04 | 47.07 | 40.19 | 56.45 | 129.31 |
| P/OCF | 35.05 | 26.50 | 36.95 | 34.15 | 24.64 | 61.28 | 45.45 | 30.87 | 25.61 | 28.41 | 29.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.39 | 8.28 | 8.80 | 5.98 | 12.49 | 9.87 | 6.09 | 4.22 | 4.65 | 4.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.16 | 26.46 | 31.95 | 30.62 | 19.53 | 40.12 | 40.12 | 28.02 | 20.18 | 22.79 | 20.86 |
| EV / EBIT | 42.25 | 32.76 | 40.72 | 36.74 | 25.11 | 46.67 | 51.70 | 37.44 | 29.14 | 32.42 | 32.56 |
| EV / FCF | — | 41.86 | 86.69 | 62.65 | 39.29 | 106.92 | 71.07 | 46.62 | 39.42 | 56.15 | 129.83 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 35.9% | 34.6% | 38.4% | 39.5% | 41.5% | 35.8% | 33.0% | 31.8% | 32.2% | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 20.1% | 20.6% | 24.1% | 26.5% | 26.8% | 19.5% | 16.1% | 14.8% | 14.4% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.1% | 16.1% | 17.0% | 20.1% | 20.3% | 23.4% | 16.1% | 13.1% | 12.0% | 9.4% | 9.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.9% | 16.9% | 17.7% | 21.3% | 23.3% | 31.6% | 20.2% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 12.6% | 13.4% |
| ROA | 12.5% | 12.5% | 13.2% | 15.9% | 16.9% | 21.7% | 13.5% | 12.3% | 12.0% | 8.4% | 8.4% |
| ROIC | 17.5% | 17.5% | 18.4% | 24.0% | 28.6% | 32.9% | 20.8% | 16.4% | 15.3% | 14.5% | 14.8% |
| ROCE | 18.4% | 18.4% | 19.0% | 22.7% | 26.2% | 30.3% | 19.5% | 18.0% | 17.6% | 15.0% | 15.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.62 | 0.82 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.12 | -0.07 | -0.19 | -0.21 | -0.19 | -0.16 | -0.07 | -0.10 | -0.03 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.50 | -0.50 | -0.24 | -0.64 | -0.65 | -0.50 | -0.55 | -0.27 | -0.39 | -0.12 | 0.08 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.80 | -0.65 | -1.31 | -1.31 | -1.32 | -0.97 | -0.46 | -0.77 | -0.29 | 0.52 |
| Interest Coverage | 998.67 | 998.67 | 202.90 | 80.32 | 90.46 | 89.11 | 48.21 | 37.48 | 30.72 | 32.32 | 30.66 |
Net cash position: cash ($791M) exceeds total debt ($417M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.02 | 3.02 | 2.79 | 2.88 | 3.70 | 2.93 | 2.73 | 3.10 | 3.15 | 2.66 | 2.66 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.11 | 2.24 | 2.90 | 2.30 | 2.09 | 2.41 | 2.40 | 1.89 | 1.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.88 | 1.27 | 1.72 | 1.28 | 1.22 | 1.29 | 1.19 | 0.84 | 0.84 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 1.08 | 0.86 | 0.88 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.44 | 4.44 | 5.01 | 4.18 | 4.21 | 4.38 | 4.29 | 5.24 | 5.46 | 5.04 | 5.06 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 68.21 | 69.71 | 63.33 | 64.18 | 63.05 | 65.51 | 63.22 | 61.23 | 57.75 | 48.49 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 12.4% | 12.4% | 12.0% | 9.6% | 9.2% | 7.7% | 13.9% | 18.7% | 20.3% | 25.9% | 24.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.8% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 2.1% | 2.8% | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| FCF Yield | 1.8% | 2.3% | 1.1% | 1.6% | 2.5% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 0.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.5% | 0.7% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.7% | 1.0% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 1.5% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $73M | $74M | $75M | $76M | $76M | $76M | $75M | $75M | $76M | $75M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WST stock.
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 55.3x. The historical average is 32.8x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 35.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.8x.
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 16.9%. The historical average is 13.7%.
Based on historical data, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 55.3x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.22% with a payout ratio of 12.4%.
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. has 35.9% gross margin and 20.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.6x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Contract manufacturing wind-down
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Reflects Biologic Exposure
WST trades at 50.1x trailing earnings and 31.8x EV/EBITDA, a substantial premium to AptarGroup's 22.8x and 12.1x, as reported in the latest valuation data. This suggests the market is pricing in sustained high-value product growth.
The forward P/E of 38.1x implies the market expects earnings to grow roughly 30% over the next year, which aligns with the recent acceleration in organic growth but leaves little room for disappointment. The PEG of 6.06 is elevated, indicating that the current price already discounts a prolonged period of above-average growth. Investors should monitor whether the GLP-1 and biologics tailwinds can justify this premium relative to more diversified packaging peers.
HVP Mix Drives Margin Expansion
Gross margin expanded to 37.7% in 2026Q2 from 35.7% a year earlier, while operating margin reached 20.5%, according to the quarterly financial statements. This reflects a favorable mix shift toward high-value products like NovaPure and FluroTec.
The sequential improvement from 35.1% gross margin in 2026Q1 suggests that the mix shift is accelerating, likely due to increased adoption of GLP-1 elastomers and biologics components. Operating margin of 20.5% is near the top of the trailing ten-quarter range, indicating strong operating leverage. However, the mid-2026 contract manufacturing wind-down could pressure margins if lower-margin contract volumes are replaced by higher-margin proprietary products, which would be a positive mix shift but may create revenue volatility.
ROIC Stable Despite Heavy Capex
ROIC has remained in a tight 4.0% to 5.1% range over the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 4.8%, as per the reported figures. This stability is notable given a 107% increase in net PPE, suggesting new capacity is being absorbed efficiently.
The consistency of ROIC around 4.8% indicates that the massive investment in production capacity is not yet diluting returns, but it also implies that the company is not generating incremental returns above its cost of capital. The asset turnover of 0.21x is low, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the business, but the high gross margins compensate. If the new capacity is fully utilized, ROIC could improve, but investors should watch for under-absorption during the contract wind-down period.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Slightly
The cash conversion cycle extended to 106 days in 2026Q2 from 98 days a year earlier, driven by a rise in DSO to 73 days, according to the quarterly data. This suggests customers are taking longer to pay, possibly due to inventory normalization.
DSO increased from 67 days in 2026Q1 to 73 days in 2026Q2, which may indicate a shift in customer mix or payment terms, but it remains within historical norms. DIO also ticked up to 75 days, reflecting higher inventory levels to support growth. The stable DPO of 42 days suggests WST is not stretching supplier payments, which is consistent with its conservative balance sheet. The lengthening CCC is a modest drag on cash flow, but the company's strong liquidity position mitigates any concern.
Minimal Leverage Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.10, with D/EBITDA at 1.74x, far below AptarGroup's 0.56 D/E, as reported in the latest balance sheet. Interest coverage exceeds 1,700x, indicating negligible debt service risk.
The company's conservative leverage is a strategic asset, allowing it to fund large-scale capex internally and weather demand shocks. The low D/EBITDA of 1.74x suggests that even if EBITDA declines due to the contract wind-down, debt service remains comfortable. However, the high valuation multiple means that any increase in leverage to fund M&A could be viewed negatively by the market. Investors should monitor whether management maintains this fortress balance sheet or becomes more aggressive in capital deployment.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Robust
The current ratio improved to 2.82 in 2026Q2 from 2.61 a year earlier, with quick ratio at 2.12, according to the balance sheet data. Cash and equivalents of $435.8M provide ample coverage for short-term obligations.
The liquidity position is strong, with current assets covering nearly three times current liabilities. The quick ratio of 2.12 indicates that even without selling inventory, WST can meet its short-term obligations. This buffer is particularly valuable given the upcoming contract manufacturing wind-down, which could cause temporary cash flow disruptions. The company's ability to self-fund its capex program without straining liquidity is a key strength, but investors should watch for any deterioration in the current ratio if working capital needs increase.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
The trailing P/E of 50.1x overstates the cost of WST's earnings because it fails to account for the non-recurring COVID-19 pull-forward and the upcoming contract wind-down, as per the reported figures. A more accurate measure is EV/EBITDA, which normalizes for these effects.
The P/E ratio is commonly misapplied to WST because it does not adjust for the cyclicality of customer inventory behavior and the one-time boost from pandemic-related demand. EV/EBITDA of 31.8x is still high but provides a clearer picture of the operating business, as it excludes depreciation and financing effects. Investors should also consider the forward EV/EBITDA of 25.6x, which reflects the expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio of 6.06 is particularly misleading, as it implies that the growth rate is unsustainable, but the company's structural moat and biologics exposure may justify a premium.