Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -1456.4%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | $3M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6M | $6M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.15 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.80 | 0.86 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.97 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 78.6% | 78.6% | 81.4% | 85.1% | 84.7% |
| Operating Margin | -432.5% | -432.5% | -77.9% | -43.8% | -2.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -628.5% | -628.5% | -84.7% | -45.4% | -159.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1456.4% | -1456.4% | — | -89.1% | -279.8% |
| ROA | -212.2% | -212.2% | -53.0% | -37.6% | -181.7% |
| ROIC | -164.2% | -164.2% | -54.1% | -37.9% | -2.3% |
| ROCE | -745.3% | -745.3% | -1037.3% | -65.2% | -3.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.19 | 1.19 | — | 2.21 | 0.25 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.80 | — | 1.87 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -67.69 | -67.69 | -13.13 | -30.79 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 1.56 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 1.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.26 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 1.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 74.67 | 53.65 | 44.17 | 92.18 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Parental funding dependency risk
According to recent financial statements, XHLD maintains a robust gross margin profile, frequently exceeding 75%, which suggests that the company's core service offering retains significant pricing power despite the broader operational challenges currently facing the organization in its primary US broadcasting and event production markets.
The persistent gap between high gross margins and deeply negative operating margins indicates that the company's cost structure is fundamentally misaligned with its current revenue scale. Investors should monitor whether management can successfully rationalize fixed studio overhead, as the current profitability profile appears to be heavily subsidized by non-operational capital support.
Based on reported figures, XHLD's asset turnover has remained consistently low, often hovering near 0.10, which indicates that the company's capital-intensive studio infrastructure is significantly underutilized relative to the revenue generated from its high-touch, service-integrated event production model in the competitive US broadcasting sector.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, characterized by wide swings in days sales outstanding, suggests that the company lacks consistent leverage over its client base. This inefficiency in working capital management likely exacerbates the firm's liquidity constraints, making it difficult to achieve a self-sustaining operational rhythm.
As reported in recent financial filings, XHLD's debt-to-equity ratio has exhibited extreme volatility, peaking at 16.10 in 2024Q2, which suggests that the company's reliance on debt is driven by immediate operational necessity rather than a strategic long-term capital allocation plan for growth.
The negative interest coverage ratios across multiple periods imply that the company is unable to service its debt obligations through core operations alone. This warrants further investigation into the terms of intercompany financing, as the current leverage profile appears unsustainable without ongoing support from the parent entity.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, XHLD's current ratio has remained consistently low, reaching a nadir of 0.18 in 2024Q2, which indicates that the company lacks the necessary liquid assets to cover its short-term obligations without relying on external financing or parent-company support.
The persistent inability to maintain a current ratio above 1.0 suggests that the company operates with a structural liquidity deficit. Investors should be cautious, as this vulnerability leaves the firm with virtually no margin for error in the event of a further decline in project-based revenue.
Analysis of the company's financial structure suggests that the P/S ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for XHLD, as it obscures the firm's role as a potential loss-leader or strategic service hub for its parent company rather than a standalone, profit-maximizing commercial entity.
Using traditional valuation multiples like P/S or P/E for XHLD is misleading because they ignore the non-arm's length nature of its intercompany relationships. Analysts should instead focus on 'strategic footprint' metrics and the parent company's consolidated cash flow capacity to assess the true viability of the business.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying XHLD stock.
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock's current P/E ratio is -0.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock's return on equity (ROE) is -1456.4%. The historical average is -184.4%.
Based on historical data, TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock has 78.6% gross margin and -432.5% operating margin.