Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.3x · EV/EBITDA 9.8x · ROE 36.2%. (2022–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $91M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $90M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.25 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.71 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.44 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 45.68 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 45.42 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.80 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.16 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.8% | 19.8% | 21.5% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 15.1% | 17.6% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.1% | 12.1% | 13.5% | 9.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 36.2% | 36.2% | 45.5% | 46.4% |
| ROA | 21.6% | 21.6% | 21.2% | 15.0% |
| ROIC | 34.2% | 34.2% | 42.0% | 46.8% |
| ROCE | 44.4% | 44.4% | 55.8% | 60.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.12 | -0.12 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.53 | 3.35 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 16141.22 | 16141.22 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($2M) exceeds total debt ($785070)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.27 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.48 | 0.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.46 | 1.76 | 1.53 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.21 | 8.21 | 5.19 | 2.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 118.83 | 23.46 | 21.16 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.2% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $55M | $55M | $55M |
Localized Operational Concentration Risk
Based on reported figures, YDDL trades at a 17.25x TTM P/E ratio, which appears to price in significant future expansion despite the inherent volatility of its commodity-linked business model and the lack of historical earnings stability compared to broader industrial sector peers.
The forward P/E of 10.35 suggests that the market anticipates a substantial earnings uplift, likely driven by the 29.54% revenue growth rate. However, investors should monitor whether this valuation is sustainable given the company's reliance on spot-market pricing and the potential for margin compression if input costs rise faster than finished goods pricing.
As reported in financial summaries, the company maintains a 19.77% gross margin, which reflects its position as a spread-based processor that must navigate the narrow gap between fluctuating raw scrap procurement costs and the market-driven selling prices of its finished metallurgical alloy products.
The 15.13% operating margin indicates a lean cost structure, yet it leaves little room for error in an environment where energy costs and logistics are significant variables. This profitability profile suggests that YDDL's earning power is highly sensitive to commodity price cycles rather than internal operational efficiencies.
Based on reported figures, YDDL operates with a negligible 0.04% debt-to-equity ratio, which highlights a reliance on internal cash flow or parent company support rather than traditional credit markets to fund its ongoing capital-intensive operations and infrastructure requirements within the domestic industrial waste sector.
While this low leverage minimizes interest rate sensitivity, it may also indicate limited access to external financing, forcing the company to fund growth through its own limited cash reserves. This strategy appears to prioritize expansion over balance sheet resilience, which warrants further investigation into the company's long-term funding sustainability.
As reported in financial statements, YDDL holds only $1.8 million in cash against $53 million in annual revenue, a disparity that indicates a significant portion of capital is tied up in working capital, potentially leaving the firm vulnerable to sudden operational disruptions or unexpected market volatility.
The current liquidity position appears strained, suggesting that any delay in receivables or a sudden need for furnace maintenance could necessitate immediate capital outlays. Investors should monitor the cash conversion cycle, as the company's aggressive growth trajectory appears to be consuming liquidity at a rate that leaves little margin for error.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to YDDL, as it obscures the company's role as a commodity-linked feedstock provider and fails to account for the significant capital tied up in inventory that is subject to LME price fluctuations and potential future write-downs.
Instead of relying on earnings multiples, analysts should focus on EV/EBITDA and inventory turnover ratios to better understand the company's operational efficiency and cash generation capabilities. Using P/E in a cyclical, low-margin business often leads to an overestimation of value during peak commodity cycles and an underestimation during downturns.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying YDDL stock.
One and one Green Technologies. Inc's current P/E ratio is 17.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
One and one Green Technologies. Inc's current EV/EBITDA is 9.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
One and one Green Technologies. Inc's return on equity (ROE) is 36.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 42.7%.
Based on historical data, One and one Green Technologies. Inc is trading at a P/E of 17.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
One and one Green Technologies. Inc has 19.8% gross margin and 15.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
One and one Green Technologies. Inc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.