Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -6.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -14.4%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $57M | $52M | $180M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $58M | $53M | $177M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -6.67 | — | 26.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.37 | 0.33 | 1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.94 | 0.90 | 3.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.34 | 1.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 19.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 23.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 29.4% | 34.9% | 39.3% | 38.7% | 34.5% | 36.5% | 40.8% | 24.0% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.0% | -7.0% | 4.6% | 8.5% | 8.0% | 2.2% | 3.1% | 8.6% | 9.5% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.3% | -5.3% | 4.7% | 5.2% | 5.1% | 3.5% | 3.2% | 8.1% | 7.1% | 6.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -14.4% | -14.4% | 15.8% | 26.7% | 35.0% | 34.3% | 43.3% | 92.9% | 89.6% | 115.7% |
| ROA | -5.6% | -5.6% | 5.3% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 4.4% | 4.1% | 10.0% | 8.7% | 6.0% |
| ROIC | -14.3% | -14.3% | 12.4% | 30.0% | 31.7% | 12.5% | 19.1% | 28.6% | 21.3% | 15.3% |
| ROCE | -16.4% | -16.4% | 12.9% | 28.6% | 30.6% | 9.9% | 14.6% | 50.7% | 106.9% | 119.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.71 | 1.25 | 1.83 | 2.02 | 2.76 | 5.14 | 3.83 | 12.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 4.35 | 2.72 | 3.35 | 5.83 | 5.17 | 3.41 | 3.84 | 5.49 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.03 | -0.05 | -0.11 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 0.91 | 2.01 | 6.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -0.28 | -0.24 | 0.67 | 0.53 | 0.91 | 0.61 | 2.01 | 3.09 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -0.22 | 1.46 | 0.66 | 1.11 | 8.10 | 3.31 | 7.07 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 44.02 | 16.95 | 7.18 | 5.17 | 5.21 | 4.31 | 4.29 | 2.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.45 | 1.44 | 1.36 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.00 | 0.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.19 | 1.23 | 1.09 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.70 | 0.65 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.20 | 1.27 | 1.18 | 1.23 | 1.14 | 0.94 |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.53 | 7.53 | 4.73 | 5.23 | 4.12 | 3.80 | 2.89 | 3.44 | 3.29 | 3.39 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 132.77 | 90.81 | 84.56 | 74.60 | 76.40 | 74.16 | 58.48 | 104.96 | 120.75 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 3.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $55M | $53M | $54M | $57M | $57M | $57M | $57M | $57M | $57M |
OEM Firmware and Trade Policy
Based on recent market data, YIBO trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.39, which suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's future earnings potential due to the persistent negative net margins and the inherent volatility of the compatible printer consumables market segment.
The lack of a positive P/E ratio indicates that the market is currently valuing the firm as a distressed asset or a speculative e-commerce play rather than a traditional hardware manufacturer. This valuation level implies that any potential for multiple expansion is entirely contingent upon management's ability to stabilize operating margins and demonstrate a clear path to sustainable profitability.
According to historical financial records, YIBO's ROIC has experienced significant degradation, falling from a peak of 29.0% in 2021Q2 to a negative 0.4% in 2025Q4, which highlights the company's struggle to generate efficient returns on its capital base in an increasingly competitive environment.
The sharp decline in ROIC suggests that the capital deployed into the business is no longer creating value, likely due to the rising costs of customer acquisition and the erosion of pricing power in the compatible toner space. Investors should monitor whether this trend represents a structural decay in the business model or a temporary impact from aggressive market share expansion efforts.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, YIBO's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 40 days in 2025Q4, which indicates that the company faces ongoing challenges in balancing inventory turnover with the payment terms required by its upstream suppliers and downstream e-commerce platform partners.
The variability in the CCC, particularly the spikes in DIO and DSO observed in earlier periods, suggests that the company's working capital management is highly sensitive to shifts in demand and supply chain logistics. This inefficiency may be a primary driver of the company's inconsistent free cash flow generation, as capital remains tied up in inventory that is subject to rapid obsolescence.
Based on the latest balance sheet data, YIBO maintains a current ratio of 1.57, providing a sufficient liquidity cushion to navigate the current period of negative operating margins and the potential for sudden inventory write-downs caused by OEM firmware updates.
While the liquidity position appears stable, the reliance on current assets—which include significant inventory—warrants caution, as the realizable value of these assets could be impaired if market conditions deteriorate. The company's ability to maintain this liquidity without resorting to additional debt is a positive, yet it does not compensate for the underlying lack of operational profitability.
The most commonly misapplied metric for YIBO is the traditional P/E ratio, which obscures the company's true nature as a high-churn e-commerce logistics and marketing entity that is currently prioritizing market share over immediate bottom-line earnings in a highly competitive, consumable-driven industry.
Using P/E to evaluate YIBO is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the high variable costs and the specific impact of digital marketing spend on the company's current profitability profile. Analysts should instead focus on EV/Sales or unit-level economics, such as customer acquisition cost versus lifetime value, to better assess the viability of the company's branded DTC strategy.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying YIBO stock.
Planet Image International Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's current P/E ratio is -6.7x. The historical average is 26.2x.
Planet Image International Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is -14.4%. The historical average is 48.8%.
Based on historical data, Planet Image International Limited Class A Ordinary Shares is trading at a P/E of -6.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Planet Image International Limited Class A Ordinary Shares has 29.4% gross margin and -7.0% operating margin.