REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AAT vs ESRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
AAT vs ESRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $964M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $436M | $768M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $71M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 1.8% |
| Operating Margin | 33.5% | 17.7% |
| Forward P/E | 45.9x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $2.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129M | $167M |
AAT vs ESRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Assets Tru… (AAT) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| Empire State Realty… (ESRT) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AAT vs ESRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 6.5%
- -21.3% 10Y total return vs ESRT's -57.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, current ratio 2.04x
ESRT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.7%, EPS growth -35.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 0.7% FFO/revenue growth vs AAT's -4.7%
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 45.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.7% FFO/revenue growth vs AAT's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 45.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs ESRT's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs ESRT's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ESRT's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs ESRT's -20.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs ESRT's 1.1%, ROIC 4.1% vs 2.6% |
AAT vs ESRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AAT vs ESRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ESRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $768M annually — 1.8x AAT's $436M. AAT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ESRT's 6.2%. On growth, ESRT holds the edge at +0.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $436M | $768M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $273M | $330M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $71M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | +1.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.4% | +60.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ESRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.0x trailing earnings, AAT trades at a 27% valuation discount to ESRT's 31.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESRT's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAT's 10.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $964M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.97x | 31.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 45.93x | 6.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.54x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.52x | 9.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.97x | 1.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.67x | 19.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAT delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $3 for ESRT. ESRT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAT's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESRT scores 6/9 vs AAT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.9% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 1.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.92x | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAT five years ago would be worth $7,932 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,403 for ESRT. Over the past 12 months, AAT leads with a +18.9% total return vs ESRT's -20.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAT at 10.0% vs ESRT's 1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.9% | -20.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.3% | +5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.7% | -46.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.3% | -57.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.0% | +1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ESRT's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAT currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs ESRT's 64.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.61 | $8.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.72 | $4.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +64.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.0 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 345K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
AAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AAT as "Buy" and ESRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for ESRT (target: $7) vs -12.4% for AAT (target: $19). For income investors, AAT offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs ESRT's 1.55%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.50 | $6.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.37 | $0.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.8% |
AAT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ESRT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AAT vs ESRT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAT or ESRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
(ESRT) is the stronger pick with 0. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT). American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) offers the better valuation at 23. 0x trailing P/E (45. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AAT or ESRT?
On trailing P/E, American Assets Trust, Inc.
(AAT) is the cheapest at 23. 0x versus Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AAT or ESRT?
Over the past 5 years, American Assets Trust, Inc.
(AAT) delivered a total return of -20. 7%, compared to -46. 0% for Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAT returned -21. 3% versus ESRT's -57. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AAT or ESRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Assets Trust, Inc.
(AAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning ESRT is approximately 39% more volatile than AAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 156% for American Assets Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AAT or ESRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
(ESRT) is pulling ahead at 0. 7% versus -4. 7% for American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Assets Trust, Inc. grew EPS -2. 1% year-over-year, compared to -35. 7% for Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESRT leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AAT or ESRT?
American Assets Trust, Inc.
(AAT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 6. 2% for Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAT leads at 33. 5% versus 17. 7% for ESRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAT leads at 61. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AAT or ESRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
(ESRT) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 45. 9x for American Assets Trust, Inc. — 39. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ESRT: 21. 7% to $6. 90.
08Which pays a better dividend — AAT or ESRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT).
09Is AAT or ESRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Assets Trust, Inc.
(AAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 6. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAT: -21. 3%, ESRT: -57. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AAT and ESRT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AAT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ESRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.