Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BANC vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BANC vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.99B | $2.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $229M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 58.7% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $3.02B | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.31B | $108M |
BANC vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banc of California,… (BANC) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BANC vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BANC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 14.3x)
- +45.7% vs CVBF's +13.6%
CVBF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth -2.3%, EPS growth 5.6%
- 67.4% 10Y total return vs BANC's 19.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.3% NII/revenue growth vs BANC's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs BANC's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BANC's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.7% vs CVBF's +13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BANC's 0.4% |
BANC vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BANC vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BANC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 2.8x CVBF's $643M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BANC's 12.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $397M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $229M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $235M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.7% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BANC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 17% valuation discount to BANC's 16.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BANC's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVBF's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.43x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.45x | 14.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.32x | 13.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.74x | 12.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVBF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVBF delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for BANC. CVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BANC's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANC scores 7/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $709M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BANC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANC five years ago would be worth $11,521 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,190 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, BANC leads with a +45.7% total return vs CVBF's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BANC at 25.6% vs CVBF's 24.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +95.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | +11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +24.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CVBF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVBF is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BANC's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVBF currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs BANC's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.61 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.24 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.7% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CVBF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BANC as "Buy" and CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.0% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -9.7% for BANC (target: $18). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.96% vs BANC's 2.06%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.3% | +2.9% |
CVBF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BANC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
BANC vs CVBF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BANC or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the stronger pick with -2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Banc of California, Inc. (BANC). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BANC or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Banc of California, Inc. at 16. 4x. On forward P/E, Banc of California, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BANC or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) delivered a total return of +15. 2%, compared to +11. 9% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVBF returned +67. 4% versus BANC's +19. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BANC or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Banc of California, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning BANC is approximately 43% more volatile than CVBF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 85% for Banc of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BANC or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is pulling ahead at -2. 3% versus -3. 3% for Banc of California, Inc. (BANC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banc of California, Inc. grew EPS 126. 9% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for CVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BANC or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 12. 6% for Banc of California, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 18. 0% for BANC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BANC or CVBF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Banc of California, Inc.
(BANC) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for CVB Financial Corp. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 0% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BANC or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 1% for Banc of California, Inc. (BANC).
09Is BANC or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVBF: +67. 4%, BANC: +19. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BANC and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.