Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $410M | $4.58B | $10.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137M | $739M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $43M | $243M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 70.2% | 70.8% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 36.8% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 15.8x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $197M | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245M | $763M | $1.43B |
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 427.5 | +327.5% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 502.78x
- PEG 0.57 vs BOKF's 4.43
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 171.3% 10Y total return vs BSVN's 152.8%
- +44.3% vs FFIN's -4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 15.8x), PEG 0.57 vs 3.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs BOKF's 1.03 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.3% vs FFIN's -4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% |
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 1 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • BOKF leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BSVN and BOKF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 24.5x BSVN's $137M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $137M | $739M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $310M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $43M | $243M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $290M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.2% | +70.8% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +36.8% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +30.2% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +39.6% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -7.7% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 53% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.57x vs BOKF's 5.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $410M | $4.6B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $166M | $4.0B | $13.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.63x | 20.65x | 16.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.76x | 15.83x | 13.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | 3.96x | 5.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.85x | 14.08x | 17.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.99x | 6.20x | 3.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 2.87x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.89x | 15.65x | 7.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 6/9 vs BSVN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.2% | +13.3% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.3% | +11.0% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +16.0% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.12x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$245M | -$566M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245M | $763M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $197M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 1.48x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BSVN and BOKF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $26,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,043 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.3% total return vs FFIN's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSVN at 24.3% vs FFIN's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.4% | +8.0% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.1% | -4.2% | +44.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.9% | +23.6% | +75.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.2% | -29.6% | +62.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.8% | +145.2% | +171.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.3% | +7.3% | +20.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSVN and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.95x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.10 | $38.74 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.47 | $28.11 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +83.2% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 52.0 | 51.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 727K | 321K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BSVN and FFIN and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSVN as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.5% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs -2.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, BSVN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.25% vs BOKF's 1.66%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $39.25 | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +2.2% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $0.72 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
BSVN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSVN or FFIN or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 6x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 7x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 57x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +169. 2%, compared to -29. 6% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +171. 3% versus FFIN's +145. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 24% more volatile than BSVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSVN or FFIN or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 57x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 31. 5% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is BSVN or FFIN or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 2. 3% yield, +152. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSVN: +152. 8%, BOKF: +171. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSVN and FFIN and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.