Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRM vs SAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
CRM vs SAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $179.88B | $200.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41.52B | $36.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.46B | $7.04B |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 23.5x |
| Total Debt | $6.74B | $8.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.33B | $8.22B |
CRM vs SAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 107.0 | +7.0% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 134.6 | +34.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRM vs SAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
- 158.4% 10Y total return vs SAP's 152.2%
SAP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.17x
- 19.1% margin vs CRM's 18.0%
- 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CRM's 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs SAP's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 23.5x), PEG 1.30 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.1% margin vs CRM's 18.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SAP's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CRM's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -30.8% vs SAP's -41.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs CRM's 6.6%, ROIC 16.0% vs 10.9% |
CRM vs SAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRM vs SAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM and SAP operate at a comparable scale, with $41.5B and $36.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.1% (SAP) to 18.0% (CRM). On growth, CRM holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41.5B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11.4B | $11.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.5B | $7.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14.4B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +19.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.7% | +22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.3% | +15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CRM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.0x trailing earnings, CRM trades at a 3% valuation discount to SAP's 24.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CRM offers better value at 1.96x vs SAP's 3.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $179.9B | $200.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $179.3B | $200.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.97x | 24.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.88x | 23.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.96x | 3.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.11x | 15.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.33x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.02x | 3.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.49x | 21.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAP delivers a 15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $13 for CRM. CRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAP's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs CRM's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +18.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$590M | -$149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.3B | $8.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.7B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 44.14x | 8.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CRM and SAP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAP five years ago would be worth $13,505 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,853 for CRM. Over the past 12 months, CRM leads with a -30.8% total return vs SAP's -41.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAP at 10.5% vs CRM's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.1% | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.8% | -41.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.5% | +34.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | +35.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.4% | +152.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.2% | +10.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CRM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRM is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAP's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRM currently trades 63.2% from its 52-week high vs SAP's 55.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $296.05 | $313.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $163.52 | $160.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.2% | +55.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 46.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.7M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SAP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRM as "Buy" and SAP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.2% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs 53.5% for CRM (target: $287). For income investors, SAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.52% vs CRM's 0.89%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $287.00 | $391.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 97 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.66 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.0% | +1.1% |
CRM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SAP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CRM vs SAP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRM or SAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for SAP SE (SAP). Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) a "Buy" — based on 97 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRM or SAP?
On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the cheapest at 24. 0x versus SAP SE at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, Salesforce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Salesforce, Inc. wins at 1. 30x versus SAP SE's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRM or SAP?
Over the past 5 years, SAP SE (SAP) delivered a total return of +35.
0%, compared to -11. 5% for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRM returned +158. 4% versus SAP's +152. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRM or SAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus SAP SE's 0. 89β — meaning SAP is approximately 9% more volatile than CRM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 18% for SAP SE — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRM or SAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus 7. 7% for SAP SE (SAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SAP SE grew EPS 126. 0% year-over-year, compared to 22. 6% for Salesforce, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRM leads at 9. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRM or SAP?
SAP SE (SAP) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
1% net margin versus 18. 0% for Salesforce, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAP leads at 26. 7% versus 21. 5% for CRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRM leads at 77. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRM or SAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 30x versus SAP SE's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 5x for SAP SE — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 127. 2% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRM or SAP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SAP SE (SAP) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 9% for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM).
09Is CRM or SAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 9% yield, +158. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +158. 4%, SAP: +152. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRM and SAP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.