Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FIHL vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Diversified
FIHL vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $2.35B | $33.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.50B | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | 36.8% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.3% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 6.3x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $449M | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $743M | $993M |
FIHL vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelis Insurance H… (FIHL) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIHL vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIHL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.9%
- Lower P/E (6.3x vs 10.1x)
- 1.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%
ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 325.3% 10Y total return vs FIHL's 70.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs FIHL's -32.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.3x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs FIHL's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs FIHL's 0.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.1% vs ACGL's +1.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs FIHL's -0.1%, ROIC 15.4% vs 4.7% |
FIHL vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FIHL vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 8.0x FIHL's $2.5B. ACGL is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIHL's -0.6%. On growth, ACGL holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$513M | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.8% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.5% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.9% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FIHL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ACGL trades at a 62% valuation discount to FIHL's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACGL's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIHL's 16.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $35.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.43x | 8.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.32x | 10.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.77x | 6.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.97x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.82x | 5.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-1 for FIHL. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIHL's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACGL scores 7/9 vs FIHL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$294M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $743M | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $449M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.83x | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FIHL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $25,069 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,093 for FIHL. Over the past 12 months, FIHL leads with a +29.1% total return vs ACGL's +1.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIHL at 19.6% vs ACGL's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.1% | +0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.1% | +1.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.9% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.9% | +150.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.9% | +325.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.6% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FIHL and ACGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIHL's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIHL currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs ACGL's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.50 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.80 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
FIHL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FIHL as "Buy" and ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for ACGL (target: $104) vs 0.8% for FIHL (target: $21). FIHL is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.17 | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | +5.6% |
FIHL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). ACGL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
FIHL vs ACGL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIHL or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 6% for Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited (FIHL). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited (FIHL) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIHL or ACGL?
On trailing P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIHL or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +150. 7%, compared to +70. 9% for Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited (FIHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +325. 3% versus FIHL's +70. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIHL or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited's 0. 48β — meaning FIHL is approximately 3020% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 18% for Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIHL or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -32. 6% for Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited (FIHL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arch Capital Group Ltd. grew EPS 3. 8% year-over-year, compared to -94. 7% for Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACGL leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIHL or ACGL?
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 4. 7% for Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACGL leads at 25. 0% versus 5. 6% for FIHL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACGL leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIHL or ACGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited (FIHL) trades at 6.
3x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Arch Capital Group Ltd. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACGL: 9. 8% to $104. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIHL or ACGL?
In this comparison, FIHL (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ACGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FIHL or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), +325. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACGL: +325. 3%, FIHL: +70. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIHL and ACGL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FIHL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FIHL pays a dividend while ACGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.