FTHM vs RKT

For growth investors, Rocket Companies, Inc.

(RKT) is the stronger pick with 34. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) offers the better valuation at 67. 1x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Rocket Companies, Inc.

(RKT) delivered a total return of -30. 3%, compared to -97. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RKT returned -20. 9% versus FTHM's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rocket Companies, Inc.

(RKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 77β versus Fathom Holdings Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning FTHM is approximately 36% more volatile than RKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 155% for Rocket Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rocket Companies, Inc.

(RKT) is pulling ahead at 34. 8% versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Rocket Companies, Inc.

(RKT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -6. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 12. 4% versus -7. 0% for FTHM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rocket Companies, Inc.

(RKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RKT: -20. 9%, FTHM: -91. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FTHM (Real Estate) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FTHM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RKT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.