HST vs PK

For growth investors, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) is the stronger pick with 7. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) delivered a total return of +47. 5%, compared to -24. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HST returned +75. 2% versus PK's -11. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 27% more volatile than HST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 138% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) is pulling ahead at 7. 6% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 11. 1% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HST leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HST leads at 13. 6% versus 8. 9% for PK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HST leads at 2. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PK: 2. 5% to $11. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 5%, versus 4. 1% for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HST: +75. 2%, PK: -11. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.