Regulated Water
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HTO vs MSEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
HTO vs MSEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $950M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $816M | $199M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $105M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 55.5% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 21.0x | 20.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.98B | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $3M |
HTO vs MSEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| H2O America (HTO) | 100 | 91.7 | -8.3% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 75.4 | -24.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTO vs MSEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta -0.21, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- 105.7% 10Y total return vs MSEX's 63.6%
MSEX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and stability.
- 22.1% margin vs HTO's 12.9%
- Lower D/E ratio (84.9% vs 128.3%)
- 3.2% ROA vs HTO's 2.2%, ROIC 4.7% vs 4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs MSEX's 1.5% | |
| Value | PEG 3.27 vs 12.52 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs HTO's 12.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (84.9% vs 128.3%) | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MSEX's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs MSEX's -14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs HTO's 2.2%, ROIC 4.7% vs 4.1% |
HTO vs MSEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HTO vs MSEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HTO and MSEX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $816M annually — 4.1x MSEX's $199M. MSEX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTO's 12.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $816M | $199M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $300M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $105M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.5% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HTO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, HTO trades at a 9% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTO offers better value at 3.08x vs MSEX's 13.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $950M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.73x | 21.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.96x | 20.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.08x | 13.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.41x | 15.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.52x | 4.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSEX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSEX delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for HTO. MSEX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HTO's 1.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HTO scores 5/9 vs MSEX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $416M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $419M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.26x | 4.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTO five years ago would be worth $10,156 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,192 for MSEX. Over the past 12 months, HTO leads with a +7.7% total return vs MSEX's -14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTO at -6.7% vs MSEX's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | +2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.7% | -14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.7% | -25.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | -28.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.7% | +63.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.7% | -9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
HTO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTO is the less volatile stock with a -0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSEX's -0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HTO currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs MSEX's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.21x | -0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.87 | $62.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.75 | $44.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 647K | 159K |
Analyst Outlook
HTO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HTO as "Buy" and MSEX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.1% upside for HTO (target: $62) vs 4.6% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, HTO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs MSEX's 2.68%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.25 | $53.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 22 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | $1.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HTO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MSEX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
HTO vs MSEX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTO or MSEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, H2O America (HTO) is the stronger pick with 7.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). H2O America (HTO) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (21. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate H2O America (HTO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTO or MSEX?
On trailing P/E, H2O America (HTO) is the cheapest at 19.
7x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, Middlesex Water Company is actually cheaper at 20. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: H2O America wins at 3. 27x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 52x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTO or MSEX?
Over the past 5 years, H2O America (HTO) delivered a total return of +1.
6%, compared to -28. 1% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HTO returned +105. 7% versus MSEX's +63. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTO or MSEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), H2O America (HTO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
21β versus Middlesex Water Company's -0. 12β — meaning MSEX is approximately -41% more volatile than HTO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 128% for H2O America — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTO or MSEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), H2O America (HTO) is pulling ahead at 7.
0% versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: H2O America grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -4. 5% for Middlesex Water Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, HTO leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTO or MSEX?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 12. 8% for H2O America — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSEX leads at 27. 9% versus 22. 6% for HTO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTO leads at 46. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTO or MSEX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, H2O America (HTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 27x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 52x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for H2O America — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HTO: 8. 1% to $62. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTO or MSEX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
H2O America (HTO) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 7% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX).
09Is HTO or MSEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, H2O America (HTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
21), 2. 8% yield, +105. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTO: +105. 7%, MSEX: +63. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTO and MSEX?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.