Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Property & Casualty
KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $7.15B | $33.67B | $4.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.92B | $19.93B | $1.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $527M | $4.40B | $395M |
| Gross Margin | 36.9% | 37.2% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | 25.0% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 10.1x | 17.9x |
| Total Debt | $224M | $2.73B | $100M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $163M | $993M | $52M |
KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kinsale Capital Gro… (KNSL) | 100 | 206.8 | +106.8% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
| RLI Corp. (RLI) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KNSL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth 21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.7%
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 324.0%
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- PEG 0.35 vs RLI's 0.88
- Beta 0.02, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.21x
RLI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KNSL's 0.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs RLI's 6.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 17.9x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.88 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs ACGL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs KNSL's 0.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KNSL's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.0% vs KNSL's -32.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs ACGL's 5.9%, ROIC 26.6% vs 15.4% |
KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNSL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 10.5x RLI's $1.9B. KNSL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RLI's 20.8%. On growth, KNSL holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $19.9B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $533M | $5.2B | $512M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $527M | $4.4B | $395M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $6.1B | $551M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | +37.2% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +25.0% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +22.1% | +20.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | +30.7% | +29.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.2% | +7.3% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +39.0% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACGL leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ACGL trades at a 43% valuation discount to KNSL's 14.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACGL offers better value at 0.29x vs RLI's 0.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.2B | $33.7B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $35.4B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.26x | 8.13x | 11.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.96x | 10.05x | 17.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | 0.29x | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.27x | 6.85x | 8.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.82x | 1.69x | 2.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.67x | 1.47x | 2.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.22x | 5.50x | 7.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RLI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNSL delivers a 28.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $19 for ACGL. RLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KNSL's 0.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLI scores 8/9 vs ACGL's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.0% | +19.0% | +22.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.1% | +5.9% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.6% | +15.4% | +22.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.2% | +11.6% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.11x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61M | $1.7B | $48M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $163M | $993M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $224M | $2.7B | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 47.02x | 34.86x | 80.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,931 for RLI. Over the past 12 months, ACGL leads with a +2.0% total return vs KNSL's -32.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACGL at 9.3% vs RLI's -6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | +0.7% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.7% | +2.0% | -29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.9% | +30.7% | -18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.2% | +144.0% | +9.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1606.7% | +324.0% | +105.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.3% | +9.3% | -6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACGL and RLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLI is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNSL's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs KNSL's 60.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.02x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $512.76 | $103.39 | $77.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $293.78 | $82.45 | $48.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.2% | +91.4% | +64.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.3 | 46.3 | 23.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 256K | 1.9M | 675K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNSL and RLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KNSL as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", RLI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for KNSL (target: $433) vs 10.0% for ACGL (target: $104). For income investors, RLI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.28% vs KNSL's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $433.00 | $104.00 | $56.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 34 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.0% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $0.02 | $2.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +5.6% | 0.0% |
ACGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KNSL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
KNSL vs ACGL vs RLI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KNSL or ACGL or RLI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 3% for RLI Corp. (RLI). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KNSL or ACGL or RLI?
On trailing P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. at 14. 3x. On forward P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Arch Capital Group Ltd. wins at 0. 35x versus RLI Corp. 's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KNSL or ACGL or RLI?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to +9. 3% for RLI Corp. (RLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNSL returned +1607% versus RLI's +105. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KNSL or ACGL or RLI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RLI Corp.
(RLI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. 's 0. 29β — meaning KNSL is approximately -4934% more volatile than RLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RLI Corp. (RLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 11% for Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KNSL or ACGL or RLI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus 6. 3% for RLI Corp. (RLI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Arch Capital Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNSL leads at 30. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KNSL or ACGL or RLI?
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 21. 4% for RLI Corp. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNSL leads at 33. 8% versus 25. 0% for ACGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KNSL leads at 52. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KNSL or ACGL or RLI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus RLI Corp. 's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 9x for RLI Corp. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNSL: 40. 2% to $433. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KNSL or ACGL or RLI?
In this comparison, RLI (5.
3% yield), KNSL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ACGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KNSL or ACGL or RLI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), +1607% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KNSL: +1607%, ACGL: +324. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KNSL and ACGL and RLI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KNSL is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RLI is a small-cap deep-value stock. RLI pays a dividend while KNSL, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.