Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $34M | $1.24B | $84M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $38M | $1.45B | $1.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $91M | $-544M |
| Gross Margin | 49.2% | 34.0% | 20.0% |
| Operating Margin | -9.9% | 14.4% | -31.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $246K | $304M | $779M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $98M | $54M |
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laird Superfood, In… (LSF) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 60.6 | -39.4% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LSF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.5%, EPS growth 83.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- 26.5% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2%
SMPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.38
- 3.7% 10Y total return vs LSF's -92.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
HAIN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -49.2% vs SMPL's -64.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.5% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs HAIN's -36.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -49.2% vs SMPL's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -23.7% |
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 39.4x LSF's $38M. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -36.1%. On growth, SMPL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $231M | -$430M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $91M | -$544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $174M | $5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.2% | +34.0% | +20.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.9% | +14.4% | -31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +6.3% | -36.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +12.0% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.5% | -0.3% | -6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | -31.6% | -11.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HAIN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34M | $1.2B | $84M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $1.4B | $808M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.50x | 12.20x | -0.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.45x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.97x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 0.86x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.37x | 0.70x | 0.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.99x | 7.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. LSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAIN's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LSF scores 6/9 vs HAIN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | +5.2% | -164.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.0% | +3.7% | -36.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -28.8% | +8.1% | -23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.1% | +9.4% | -29.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.17x | 1.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $206M | $725M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $98M | $54M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $246,430 | $304M | $779M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.77x | -8.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LSF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMPL five years ago would be worth $3,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $182 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, HAIN leads with a -49.2% total return vs SMPL's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LSF at 52.4% vs HAIN's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.3% | -36.4% | -29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.1% | -64.8% | -49.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +253.9% | -67.8% | -95.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | -64.3% | -98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | +3.7% | -98.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.4% | -31.5% | -65.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LSF and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSF currently trades 39.7% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.34x | 2.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.94 | $36.92 | $2.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.96 | $10.21 | $0.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.7% | +33.7% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 42.9 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 2.8M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMPL as "Buy", HAIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 58.8% for HAIN (target: $1).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.17 | $1.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +4.1% | +1.7% |
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LSF or SMPL or HAIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Laird Superfood, Inc.
(LSF) is the stronger pick with 26. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LSF or SMPL or HAIN?
Over the past 5 years, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) delivered a total return of -64.
3%, compared to -98. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMPL returned +2. 2% versus HAIN's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LSF or SMPL or HAIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
34β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 19β — meaning HAIN is approximately 539% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 164% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LSF or SMPL or HAIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Laird Superfood, Inc.
(LSF) is pulling ahead at 26. 5% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Laird Superfood, Inc. grew EPS 83. 5% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LSF or SMPL or HAIN?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -29. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LSF leads at 40. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LSF or SMPL or HAIN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62.
1% to $20. 17.
07Which pays a better dividend — LSF or SMPL or HAIN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LSF or SMPL or HAIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
34)). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +2. 2%, HAIN: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LSF and SMPL and HAIN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LSF is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.