Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAVI vs PRA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAVI
Navient Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$821M
5Y Perf.+17.3%
PRA
ProAssurance Corporation

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.27B
5Y Perf.+78.3%

NAVI vs PRA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAVI logoNAVI
PRA logoPRA
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$821M$1.27B
Revenue (TTM)$3.23B$1.08B
Net Income (TTM)$-60M$65M
Gross Margin87.0%25.5%
Operating Margin77.1%8.4%
Forward P/E12.2x21.8x
Total Debt$45.71B$435M
Cash & Equiv.$2.10B$36M

NAVI vs PRALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAVI
PRA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Navient Corporation (NAVI)100117.3+17.3%
ProAssurance Corpor… (PRA)100178.3+78.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAVI vs PRA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PRA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Navient Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NAVI
Navient Corporation
The Banking Pick

NAVI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 7.3%
  • 15.3% 10Y total return vs PRA's -18.0%
  • Lower P/E (12.2x vs 21.8x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PRA
ProAssurance Corporation
The Insurance Pick

PRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth -2.7%, EPS growth -3.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 32.2%, current ratio 1.33x
  • Beta 0.05, current ratio 1.33x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRA logoPRA-2.7% revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7%
ValueNAVI logoNAVILower P/E (12.2x vs 21.8x)
Quality / MarginsPRA logoPRA6.0% margin vs NAVI's -2.5%
Stability / SafetyPRA logoPRABeta 0.05 vs NAVI's 0.92, lower leverage
DividendsNAVI logoNAVI7.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRA logoPRA+7.1% vs NAVI's -25.4%
Efficiency (ROA)PRA logoPRA1.2% ROA vs NAVI's -0.1%, ROIC 3.2% vs 3.8%

NAVI vs PRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NAVINavient Corporation
FY 2025
Federal Education Loans Segment
38.6%$51M
Other Operating Segment
35.6%$47M
Business Processing
17.4%$23M
Consumer Lending
8.3%$11M
PRAProAssurance Corporation
FY 2025
Specialty Property and Casualty
77.5%$724M
Workers' Compensation Insurance Segment
17.6%$164M
Segregated Portfolio Cell Reinsurance
4.9%$46M

NAVI vs PRA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNAVILAGGINGPRA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

NAVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 3.0x PRA's $1.1B. PRA is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PRA logoPRAProAssurance Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$544M$101M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$60M$65M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$323M-$17M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.0%+25.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+77.1%+8.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.5%+6.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.7%-1.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%+2.5%
NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NAVI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, NAVI's 17.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRA's 19.5x.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PRA logoPRAProAssurance Corp…
Market CapShares × price$821M$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$44.4B$1.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-10.78x24.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.21x21.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.81x19.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.25x1.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.36x0.94x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.86x
NAVI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PRA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

PRA delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. PRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NAVI scores 5/9 vs PRA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PRA logoPRAProAssurance Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.5%+5.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.1%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.8%+3.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.5%+4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage19.05x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$43.6B$399M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.1B$36M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$45.7B$435M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.21x4.53x
PRA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRA five years ago would be worth $9,564 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,022 for NAVI. Over the past 12 months, PRA leads with a +7.1% total return vs NAVI's -25.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRA at 9.7% vs NAVI's -10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PRA logoPRAProAssurance Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-30.4%+2.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-25.4%+7.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.2%+31.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-29.8%-4.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.3%-18.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.5%+9.7%
PRA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAVI's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRA currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs NAVI's 54.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PRA logoPRAProAssurance Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.92x0.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.07$24.85
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.80$22.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.3%+99.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.052.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded924K798K
PRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NAVI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates NAVI as "Hold" and PRA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -0.7% upside for NAVI (target: $9) vs -25.5% for PRA (target: $18). NAVI is the only dividend payer here at 7.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PRA logoPRAProAssurance Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.67$18.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts2411
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.64
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+13.5%0.0%
NAVI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NAVI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRA leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).

Best OverallNavient Corporation (NAVI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAVI vs PRA: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAVI or PRA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) is the stronger pick with -2.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Navient Corporation (NAVI) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAVI or PRA?

On forward P/E, Navient Corporation is actually cheaper at 12.

2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAVI or PRA?

Over the past 5 years, ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) delivered a total return of -4.

4%, compared to -29. 8% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NAVI returned +15. 3% versus PRA's -18. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAVI or PRA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

05β versus Navient Corporation's 0. 92β — meaning NAVI is approximately 1824% more volatile than PRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAVI or PRA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) is pulling ahead at -2.

7% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProAssurance Corporation grew EPS -3. 9% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAVI or PRA?

ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

6% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 6. 6% for PRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NAVI leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAVI or PRA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Navient Corporation (NAVI) trades at 12.

2x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for ProAssurance Corporation — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NAVI: -0. 7% to $8. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAVI or PRA?

In this comparison, NAVI (7.

3% yield) pays a dividend. PRA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NAVI or PRA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

05)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRA: -18. 0%, NAVI: +15. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAVI and PRA?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NAVI pays a dividend while PRA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NAVI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NAVI and PRA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NAVI: -23.7% · PRA: -2.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.