Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
PBFS vs DCOM vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PBFS vs DCOM vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $366M | $1.64B | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $730M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $111M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 56.1% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.3% | 21.5% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 10.7x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $371M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $2.35B | $185M |
PBFS vs DCOM vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 153.0 | +53.0% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBFS vs DCOM vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBFS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.66 vs DCOM's 1.68
- Beta 0.52 vs DCOM's 1.05
DCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 10.8x)
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs DCOM's 67.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs DCOM's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DCOM's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.8% vs NBTB's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6% |
PBFS vs DCOM vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PBFS vs DCOM vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 2 • PBFS leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.8x PBFS's $88M. PBFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DCOM's 15.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $730M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $161M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $111M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $182M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +56.1% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +21.5% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +15.2% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +25.0% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +2.3% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 29% valuation discount to PBFS's 19.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PBFS offers better value at 0.66x vs DCOM's 2.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $366M | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $247M | -$345M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.22x | 15.69x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.69x | 10.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.66x | 2.46x | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.52x | -2.20x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 2.24x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.08x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.38x | 8.98x | 10.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for PBFS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DCOM's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs PBFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +7.7% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +5.6% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +6.1% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$119M | -$2.0B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $2.4B | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $371M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 0.57x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,950 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,277 for PBFS. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +45.8% total return vs NBTB's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 31.7% vs NBTB's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | +26.2% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.4% | +45.8% | +9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.7% | +128.6% | +54.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.8% | +24.3% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.9% | +67.4% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | +31.7% | +15.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBFS and DCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 1.05x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.18 | $37.77 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.09 | $24.57 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +98.5% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 55.4 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 269K | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DCOM as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.2% upside for DCOM (target: $40) vs 1.8% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.16% vs DCOM's 2.68%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.50 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
DCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NBTB leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PBFS vs DCOM vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBFS or DCOM or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBFS or DCOM or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 54x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 68x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBFS or DCOM or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to +22. 8% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus PBFS's -0. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBFS or DCOM or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DCOM is approximately 103% more volatile than PBFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 25% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PBFS or DCOM or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBFS or DCOM or NBTB?
Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 15. 2% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBFS leads at 37. 3% versus 21. 5% for DCOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PBFS or DCOM or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 54x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 68x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DCOM: 6. 2% to $39. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PBFS or DCOM or NBTB?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
2% yield), DCOM (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PBFS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PBFS or DCOM or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, PBFS: -0. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PBFS and DCOM and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PBFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. DCOM, NBTB pay a dividend while PBFS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.