Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $252M | $708M | $12.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $690M | $507M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-40M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 37.5% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | -19.8% | -4.4% | -11.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 129.4x | 167.2x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $51M | $167M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $210M | $216M |
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicom Ltd. (SILC) | 100 | 131.2 | +31.2% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI) | 100 | 1784.3 | +1684.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SILC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.34
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.11x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 4.11x
NTGR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (129.4x vs 167.2x)
- -5.8% margin vs SILC's -18.5%
AAOI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 82.8%, EPS growth 85.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs SILC's 71.8%
- 82.8% revenue growth vs NTGR's 2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 82.8% revenue growth vs NTGR's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (129.4x vs 167.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.8% margin vs SILC's -18.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs AAOI's 4.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.3% vs NTGR's -9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.8% ROA vs SILC's -7.6%, ROIC -7.9% vs -10.5% |
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTGR leads in 2 of 6 categories
AAOI leads 1 • SILC leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $690M annually — 11.1x SILC's $62M. NTGR is the more profitable business, keeping -5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SILC's -18.5%. On growth, AAOI holds the edge at +51.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $690M | $507M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$19M | -$37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$40M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$11M | -$239M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +37.5% | +29.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.8% | -4.4% | -11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.5% | -5.8% | -8.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -1.6% | -47.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -2.0% | +51.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.1% | -123.8% | -5.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NTGR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $252M | $708M | $12.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $227M | $549M | $12.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.01x | -22.71x | -246.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 129.45x | 167.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.07x | 1.02x | 27.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.15x | 1.50x | 12.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SILC and NTGR and AAOI each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAOI delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-9 for SILC. SILC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAOI's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SILC scores 5/9 vs AAOI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | -8.0% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.6% | -4.9% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.5% | -8.4% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.4% | -6.0% | -8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.10x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$159M | -$49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $210M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $51M | $167M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -28.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAOI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $207,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,704 for NTGR. Over the past 12 months, AAOI leads with a +1027.0% total return vs NTGR's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.5% vs SILC's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +211.4% | +6.5% | +297.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +185.3% | -9.7% | +1027.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.8% | +86.5% | +8801.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | -33.0% | +1978.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.8% | -37.7% | +1435.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +23.1% | +3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SILC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SILC is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SILC currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs NTGR's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.39x | 4.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.92 | $36.86 | $191.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.34 | $19.00 | $12.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +70.2% | +82.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.3 | 56.1 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 515K | 12.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SILC as "Hold", NTGR as "Hold", AAOI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.0% upside for NTGR (target: $36) vs -70.8% for AAOI (target: $46).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 17 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +7.2% | 0.0% |
NTGR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AAOI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SILC or NTGR or AAOI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is the stronger pick with 82. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Analysts rate Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SILC or NTGR or AAOI?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1978%, compared to -33. 0% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAOI returned +1436% versus NTGR's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SILC or NTGR or AAOI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicom Ltd.
(SILC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 13β — meaning AAOI is approximately 208% more volatile than SILC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Silicom Ltd. (SILC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 23% for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SILC or NTGR or AAOI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is pulling ahead at 82. 8% versus 2. 9% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. grew EPS 85. 8% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAOI leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SILC or NTGR or AAOI?
NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 7% net margin versus -18. 5% for Silicom Ltd. — meaning it keeps -4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTGR leads at -5. 1% versus -19. 8% for SILC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTGR leads at 36. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SILC or NTGR or AAOI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) trades at 129. 4x forward P/E versus 167. 2x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTGR: 39. 0% to $36. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SILC or NTGR or AAOI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SILC or NTGR or AAOI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1436% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAOI: +1436%, NTGR: -37. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SILC and NTGR and AAOI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SILC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.