Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI vs CALX vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
Software - Application
Semiconductors
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI vs CALX vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $252M | $708M | $12.44B | $2.81B | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $690M | $507M | $1.06B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-40M | $-43M | $34M | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 37.5% | 29.6% | 57.1% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -19.8% | -4.4% | -11.6% | 3.8% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 129.4x | 167.2x | 24.5x | 105.1x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $51M | $167M | $26M | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $210M | $216M | $143M | $14.27B |
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI vs CALX vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicom Ltd. (SILC) | 100 | 131.2 | +31.2% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI) | 100 | 1784.3 | +1684.3% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 308.7 | +208.7% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI vs CALX vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SILC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NTGR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AAOI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 82.8%, EPS growth 85.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs INTC's 299.2%
- 82.8% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
- +10.3% vs NTGR's -9.7%
CALX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 4.24x
- Lower P/E (24.5x vs 105.1x)
Among these 5 stocks, INTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 82.8% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.5x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs SILC's -18.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs AAOI's 4.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.3% vs NTGR's -9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs SILC's -7.6%, ROIC 2.1% vs -10.5% |
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI vs CALX vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI vs CALX vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CALX leads in 3 of 6 categories
AAOI leads 1 • SILC leads 0 • NTGR leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTC is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.8B annually — 868.2x SILC's $62M. CALX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SILC's -18.5%. On growth, AAOI holds the edge at +51.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $690M | $507M | $1.1B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$19M | -$37M | $57M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$40M | -$43M | $34M | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$11M | -$239M | $109M | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +37.5% | +29.6% | +57.1% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.8% | -4.4% | -11.6% | +3.8% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.5% | -5.8% | -8.5% | +3.2% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -1.6% | -47.1% | +10.3% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -2.0% | +51.4% | +27.1% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.1% | -123.8% | -5.6% | +3.3% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NTGR and INTC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INTC's 49.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 69.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $252M | $708M | $12.4B | $2.8B | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $227M | $549M | $12.4B | $2.7B | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.01x | -22.71x | -246.17x | 167.38x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 129.45x | 167.16x | 24.49x | 105.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 69.62x | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.07x | 1.02x | 27.29x | 2.81x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.15x | 1.50x | 12.92x | 3.57x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 24.34x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-9 for SILC. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INTC's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CALX scores 6/9 vs AAOI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | -8.0% | -6.1% | +4.2% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.6% | -4.9% | -3.8% | +3.5% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.5% | -8.4% | -7.9% | +2.1% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.4% | -6.0% | -8.5% | +2.5% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.10x | 0.23x | 0.03x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$159M | -$49M | -$118M | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $210M | $216M | $143M | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $51M | $167M | $26M | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -28.36x | — | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAOI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $207,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,704 for NTGR. Over the past 12 months, AAOI leads with a +1027.0% total return vs NTGR's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.5% vs CALX's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +211.4% | +6.5% | +297.9% | -18.8% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +185.3% | -9.7% | +1027.0% | +3.3% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.8% | +86.5% | +8801.1% | +2.1% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | -33.0% | +1978.5% | -9.3% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.8% | -37.7% | +1435.6% | +513.0% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +23.1% | +3.5% | +0.7% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CALX and INTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INTC currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.39x | 4.13x | 0.99x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.92 | $36.86 | $191.87 | $71.22 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.34 | $19.00 | $12.56 | $40.75 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +70.2% | +82.1% | +61.1% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.3 | 56.1 | 62.9 | 43.3 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 515K | 12.4M | 918K | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CALX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SILC as "Hold", NTGR as "Hold", AAOI as "Buy", CALX as "Buy", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs -70.8% for AAOI (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 | $46.00 | $61.00 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 17 | 16 | 21 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +7.2% | 0.0% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
CALX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AAOI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SILC vs NTGR vs AAOI vs CALX vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is the stronger pick with 82. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Calix, Inc. (CALX) offers the better valuation at 167. 4x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC?
On forward P/E, Calix, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1978%, compared to -33. 0% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAOI returned +1436% versus NTGR's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 13β — meaning AAOI is approximately 315% more volatile than CALX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 37% for Intel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is pulling ahead at 82. 8% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAOI leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC?
Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -18. 5% for Silicom Ltd. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CALX leads at 2. 1% versus -19. 8% for SILC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CALX leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 167. 2x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 142. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 40. 2% to $61. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SILC or NTGR or AAOI or CALX or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +513. 0% 10Y return). Intel Corporation (INTC) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALX: +513. 0%, INTC: +299. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SILC and NTGR and AAOI and CALX and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SILC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.