Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SSB vs CFG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SSB vs CFG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.79B | $27.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.76B | $12.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $799M | $1.70B |
| Gross Margin | 68.3% | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.31B | $12.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $583M | $11.24B |
SSB vs CFG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SouthState Corporat… (SSB) | 100 | 185.3 | +85.3% |
| Citizens Financial … (CFG) | 100 | 266.4 | +166.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSB vs CFG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 2.4%
- Rev growth 57.0%, EPS growth 12.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 14.5%, current ratio 0.22x
CFG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 257.8% 10Y total return vs SSB's 67.9%
- Beta 1.33, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.25x
- +73.3% vs SSB's +14.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.0% NII/revenue growth vs CFG's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 12.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFG's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs CFG's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs CFG's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.3% vs SSB's +14.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFG's 0.4% |
SSB vs CFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SSB vs CFG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.3B annually — 3.3x SSB's $3.8B. SSB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CFG's 12.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.8B | $12.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $799M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.3% | +57.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.9% | +38.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SSB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, SSB trades at a 42% valuation discount to CFG's 21.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SSB's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CFG's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.8B | $27.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $28.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.39x | 21.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.30x | 12.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.98x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.61x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SSB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SSB delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFG. SSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFG's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFG scores 7/9 vs SSB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $731M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $583M | $11.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $12.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CFG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFG five years ago would be worth $14,687 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,035 for SSB. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +73.3% total return vs SSB's +14.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CFG at 39.1% vs SSB's 17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.3% | +73.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.3% | +169.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.3% | +46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.9% | +257.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +39.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSB and CFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSB is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CFG's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFG currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs SSB's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $108.46 | $68.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.48 | $37.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 841K | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SSB and CFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SSB as "Buy" and CFG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for SSB (target: $118) vs 12.8% for CFG (target: $72). For income investors, CFG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.64% vs SSB's 2.36%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $118.20 | $72.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.30 | $1.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +4.9% |
SSB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SSB vs CFG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSB or CFG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the stronger pick with 57.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). SouthState Corporation (SSB) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SouthState Corporation (SSB) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSB or CFG?
On trailing P/E, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, SouthState Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSB or CFG?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
(CFG) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to +20. 3% for SouthState Corporation (SSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFG returned +257. 8% versus SSB's +67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSB or CFG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
02β versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning CFG is approximately 30% more volatile than SSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SouthState Corporation (SSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 51% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSB or CFG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SouthState Corporation (SSB) is pulling ahead at 57.
0% versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SouthState Corporation grew EPS 12. 8% year-over-year, compared to -3. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSB or CFG?
SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
3% net margin versus 12. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSB leads at 27. 9% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSB or CFG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SouthState Corporation (SSB) trades at 10.
3x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSB: 21. 3% to $118. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSB or CFG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 4% for SouthState Corporation (SSB).
09Is SSB or CFG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
02), 2. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSB: +67. 9%, CFG: +257. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSB and CFG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SSB is a small-cap high-growth stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.