Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SYF vs COF vs BFH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
SYF vs COF vs BFH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $25.72B | $119.19B | $3.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.12B | $69.25B | $4.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.60B | $2.45B | $518M |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 47.3% | 63.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.2% | 3.3% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | 9.8x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $15.18B | $51.00B | $4.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.97B | $57.43B | $3.60B |
SYF vs COF vs BFH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 363.3 | +263.3% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 283.0 | +183.0% |
| Bread Financial Hol… (BFH) | 100 | 234.0 | +134.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYF vs COF vs BFH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 90.6%, current ratio 0.21x
- PEG 0.25 vs BFH's 0.40
COF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 205.6% 10Y total return vs SYF's 176.3%
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs SYF's -7.9%
- 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%
BFH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth -2.1%, EPS growth 99.3%
- NIM 17.9% vs COF's 6.4%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 9.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs SYF's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BFH's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.52 vs COF's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.6% vs COF's +4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BFH's 0.5% |
SYF vs COF vs BFH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SYF vs COF vs BFH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 14.7x BFH's $4.7B. SYF is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.1B | $69.3B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.9B | $7.5B | $694M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.6B | $2.5B | $518M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9.8B | $27.7B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +47.3% | +63.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +3.3% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +3.5% | +11.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +51.5% | +37.7% | +44.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.1% | +22.1% | +7.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BFH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, BFH trades at a 83% valuation discount to COF's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.24x vs BFH's 0.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25.7B | $119.2B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.9B | $112.8B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.97x | 47.77x | 7.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.99x | 9.76x | 7.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | — | 0.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.05x | 14.95x | 6.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.35x | 1.72x | 0.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | 0.92x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.61x | 4.56x | 1.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. COF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BFH's 1.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SYF scores 7/9 vs COF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.4% | +2.4% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +0.4% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.8% | +1.3% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +1.4% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.45x | 1.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $209M | -$6.4B | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15.0B | $57.4B | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.2B | $51.0B | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.13x | 0.14x | 0.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $17,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,100 for BFH. Over the past 12 months, BFH leads with a +79.6% total return vs COF's +4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFH at 52.4% vs COF's 31.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.9% | -22.0% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | +4.7% | +79.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +181.9% | +124.7% | +254.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +30.2% | -9.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.3% | +205.6% | -39.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.3% | +31.0% | +52.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYF and BFH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYF is the less volatile stock with a 1.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COF's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BFH currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs COF's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.58x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.77 | $259.64 | $98.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.23 | $174.98 | $48.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +74.2% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 50.3 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 4.6M | 641K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SYF and COF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYF as "Buy", COF as "Buy", BFH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 5.6% for BFH (target: $91). For income investors, COF offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs BFH's 1.06%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.55 | $267.18 | $91.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 56 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.7% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $3.27 | $0.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.4% | +3.4% | +7.9% |
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BFH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SYF vs COF vs BFH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYF or COF or BFH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Synchrony Financial (SYF). Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synchrony Financial (SYF) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYF or COF or BFH?
On trailing P/E, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
(BFH) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYF or COF or BFH?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +72.
2%, compared to -9. 0% for Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COF returned +205. 6% versus BFH's -39. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYF or COF or BFH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
52β versus Capital One Financial Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning COF is approximately 4% more volatile than SYF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 132% for Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYF or COF or BFH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -7. 9% for Synchrony Financial (SYF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 99. 3% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYF or COF or BFH?
Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYF leads at 24. 2% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFH leads at 63. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYF or COF or BFH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 9. 8x for Capital One Financial Corporation — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 8% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYF or COF or BFH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 1. 1% for Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH).
09Is SYF or COF or BFH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
6% yield, +176. 3% 10Y return). Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYF: +176. 3%, BFH: -39. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYF and COF and BFH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BFH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.