Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYF vs COF vs BFH vs ALLY vs MA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
SYF vs COF vs BFH vs ALLY vs MA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $26.12B | $119.72B | $4.06B | $13.67B | $435.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.12B | $69.25B | $4.70B | $12.15B | $32.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.60B | $2.45B | $518M | $852M | $15.57B |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 47.3% | 63.3% | 52.0% | 83.4% |
| Operating Margin | 24.2% | 3.3% | 13.1% | 8.6% | 59.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 9.8x | 8.0x | 8.3x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $15.18B | $51.00B | $4.39B | $21.77B | $19.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.97B | $57.43B | $3.60B | $10.03B | $10.57B |
SYF vs COF vs BFH vs ALLY vs MA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 368.9 | +268.9% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 284.2 | +184.2% |
| Bread Financial Hol… (BFH) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 100 | 254.0 | +154.0% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYF vs COF vs BFH vs ALLY vs MA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 1.6%
- PEG 0.25 vs MA's 1.19
COF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7%
- 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MA's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BFH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth -2.1%, EPS growth 99.3%
- NIM 17.9% vs ALLY's 2.7%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 25.1x), PEG 0.41 vs 1.19
- +83.6% vs MA's -11.4%
Among these 5 stocks, ALLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 428.0% 10Y total return vs SYF's 179.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.67, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.03x
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BFH's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 25.1x), PEG 0.41 vs 1.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BFH's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs COF's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MA's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs MA's -11.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BFH's 0.5% |
SYF vs COF vs BFH vs ALLY vs MA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SYF vs COF vs BFH vs ALLY vs MA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MA leads in 2 of 6 categories
BFH leads 2 • SYF leads 0 • COF leads 0 • ALLY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 14.7x BFH's $4.7B. MA is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.1B | $69.3B | $4.7B | $12.2B | $32.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.9B | $7.5B | $694M | $2.0B | $21.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.6B | $2.5B | $518M | $852M | $15.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9.8B | $27.7B | $2.1B | -$295M | $17.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +47.3% | +63.3% | +52.0% | +83.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +3.3% | +13.1% | +8.6% | +59.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +3.5% | +11.0% | +7.0% | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +51.5% | +37.7% | +44.5% | — | +51.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.1% | +22.1% | +7.3% | +2.7% | +21.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BFH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, BFH trades at a 83% valuation discount to COF's 48.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.25x vs MA's 1.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.1B | $119.7B | $4.1B | $13.7B | $435.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.3B | $113.3B | $4.9B | $25.4B | $443.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.09x | 47.99x | 8.06x | 18.69x | 29.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.11x | 9.80x | 8.00x | 8.31x | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.25x | — | 0.41x | — | 1.42x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.13x | 15.02x | 6.99x | 12.92x | 21.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.37x | 1.73x | 0.86x | 1.12x | 13.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 0.92x | 1.22x | 0.90x | 57.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.65x | 4.58x | 1.94x | — | 25.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. COF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs ALLY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.4% | +2.4% | +16.1% | +5.5% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +0.4% | +2.3% | +0.4% | +29.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.8% | +1.3% | +5.6% | +2.2% | +56.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +1.4% | +7.3% | +3.0% | +64.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.45x | 1.32x | 1.40x | 2.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $209M | -$6.4B | $789M | $11.7B | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15.0B | $57.4B | $3.6B | $10.0B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.2B | $51.0B | $4.4B | $21.8B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.13x | 0.14x | 0.72x | 0.22x | 27.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $17,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,484 for ALLY. Over the past 12 months, BFH leads with a +83.6% total return vs MA's -11.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFH at 53.5% vs MA's 9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.5% | -21.7% | +17.6% | -1.9% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.0% | +5.6% | +83.6% | +39.8% | -11.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.1% | +125.7% | +261.4% | +91.1% | +29.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.6% | +31.8% | -4.0% | -5.2% | +34.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.0% | +207.8% | -38.8% | +209.7% | +428.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.0% | +31.2% | +53.5% | +24.1% | +9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALLY and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COF's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLY currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs COF's 74.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.58x | 1.52x | 1.42x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.77 | $259.64 | $98.39 | $47.27 | $601.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.99 | $174.98 | $47.87 | $32.28 | $480.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.7% | +74.5% | +89.7% | +93.7% | +81.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 44.7 | 54.4 | 52.7 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 4.7M | 641K | 3.5M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COF and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYF as "Buy", COF as "Buy", BFH as "Hold", ALLY as "Buy", MA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.1% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 3.4% for BFH (target: $91). For income investors, COF offers the higher dividend yield at 1.69% vs MA's 0.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.55 | $267.18 | $91.33 | $53.33 | $656.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 56 | 37 | 38 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.7% | +1.0% | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $3.27 | $0.91 | — | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.3% | +3.4% | +7.7% | 0.0% | +2.7% |
MA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BFH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SYF vs COF vs BFH vs ALLY vs MA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synchrony Financial (SYF) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA?
On trailing P/E, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
(BFH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 48. 0x. On forward P/E, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus Mastercard Incorporated's 1. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +78.
6%, compared to -5. 2% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +428. 0% versus BFH's -38. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Capital One Financial Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning COF is approximately 137% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 99. 3% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA?
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
6% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 45. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MA leads at 59. 2% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Mastercard Incorporated's 1. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Mastercard Incorporated — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 1% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA?
In this comparison, COF (1.
7% yield), SYF (1. 6% yield), BFH (1. 0% yield), MA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ALLY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYF or COF or BFH or ALLY or MA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 0. 6% yield, +428. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +428. 0%, ALLY: +209. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYF and COF and BFH and ALLY and MA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BFH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock. SYF, COF, BFH, MA pay a dividend while ALLY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.