Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WAFD vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
WAFD vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.72B | $5.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.41B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $243M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $657M | $910M |
WAFD vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.8 | +37.8% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 186.8 | +86.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAFD vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- 84.0% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.00x
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
- NIM 3.8% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | PEG 3.55 vs 3.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAFD's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs HOMB's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.3% vs HOMB's -1.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAFD's 0.3% |
WAFD vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WAFD vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB and WAFD operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $1.4B in trailing revenue. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $277M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $243M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $226M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.3% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 1% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WAFD offers better value at 4.40x vs HOMB's 4.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.55x | 13.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.92x | 10.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.40x | 4.42x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.98x | 10.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 3.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.08x | 12.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $657M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,758 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +29.3% total return vs HOMB's -1.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAFD at 14.8% vs HOMB's 12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.3% | -1.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.5% | +42.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | +7.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.0% | +58.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.8% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOMB's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.02 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.31 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 660K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WAFD and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WAFD as "Hold" and HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -1.8% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, WAFD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs HOMB's 2.77%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +1.6% |
HOMB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WAFD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
WAFD vs HOMB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAFD or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAFD or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WaFd, Inc. wins at 3. 55x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 57x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAFD or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +22. 3%, compared to +7. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAFD returned +84. 0% versus HOMB's +58. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAFD or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning HOMB is approximately 1% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAFD or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WaFd, Inc. grew EPS 5. 2% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAFD or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 65. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAFD or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 55x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 57x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for WaFd, Inc. — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 18. 4% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAFD or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 8% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB).
09Is WAFD or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 0%, HOMB: +58. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAFD and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.