Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.73B | $5.29B | $2.22B | $4.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.41B | $1.45B | $819M | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $243M | $458M | $195M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 65.6% | 79.0% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 36.0% | 29.5% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 10.8x | 10.5x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $1.20B | $373M | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $657M | $910M | $183M | $763M |
WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.5 | +37.5% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +28.5% vs FFIN's -3.2%
HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.8% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5%
BANR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 3.0%
- 101.1% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- PEG 0.91 vs HOMB's 3.55
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.91 vs 3.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% |
WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BANR leads 2 • WAFD leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.0x FFIN's $739M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.5B | $819M | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $277M | $601M | $253M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $243M | $458M | $195M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $226M | $354M | $248M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +65.6% | +79.0% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +36.0% | +29.5% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +27.7% | +23.8% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +29.1% | +30.3% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.3% | +26.0% | +11.2% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 44% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $5.3B | $2.2B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $5.6B | $2.4B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.56x | 13.36x | 11.63x | 20.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.89x | 10.83x | 10.51x | 15.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.41x | 4.39x | 1.00x | 3.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.98x | 10.12x | 9.55x | 14.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 3.64x | 2.71x | 6.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.36x | 1.16x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.09x | 12.53x | 8.96x | 15.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs FFIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +10.9% | +10.3% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +2.0% | +1.2% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +7.2% | +7.7% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +9.8% | +10.1% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.30x | 0.19x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $292M | $190M | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $657M | $910M | $183M | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $1.2B | $373M | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 1.44x | 1.11x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BANR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANR five years ago would be worth $12,958 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +28.5% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BANR at 17.1% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | -3.0% | +6.6% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.5% | -1.9% | +9.1% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.6% | +42.0% | +60.7% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.5% | +6.6% | +29.6% | -28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.4% | +58.2% | +101.1% | +145.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +12.4% | +17.1% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.81x | 0.79x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.12 | $30.83 | $69.83 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.31 | $25.68 | $57.05 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +87.1% | +93.9% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.3 | 50.3 | 58.0 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 661K | 1.4M | 292K | 740K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAFD as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, BANR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.99% vs FFIN's 2.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $32.00 | $70.00 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 19 | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 21 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | $0.75 | $1.96 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +1.6% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BANR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
6x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Banner Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 91x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Banner Corporation (BANR) delivered a total return of +29.
6%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +144. 5% versus HOMB's +57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning FFIN is approximately 20% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banner Corporation (BANR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN).
09Is WAFD or HOMB or BANR or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 0% yield, +101. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +101. 4%, FFIN: +144. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAFD and HOMB and BANR and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.