Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ABCB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
ABCB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.89B | $699M | $3.09B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $315M | $627M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $412M | $69M | $-398M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 68.3% | 69.6% | 5.8% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 32.0% | 25.8% | -84.2% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 9.6x | 10.3x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $743M | $117M | $641M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $254M | $52M | $380M | $185M |
ABCB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ameris Bancorp (ABCB) | 100 | 356.1 | +256.1% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABCB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABCB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 198.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
- PEG 1.32 vs IBCP's 1.82
- NIM 3.4% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- PEG 1.32 vs 1.53
IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83 vs SFNC's 1.02
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | PEG 1.32 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.5% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
ABCB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ABCB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 1 of 6 categories
ABCB leads 1 • SFNC leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ABCB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABCB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 5.3x IBCP's $315M. ABCB is the more profitable business, keeping 24.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $315M | $627M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $596M | $89M | -$497M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $412M | $69M | -$398M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $370M | $70M | $755M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.3% | +69.6% | +5.8% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +25.8% | -84.2% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +21.7% | -63.4% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +22.2% | +71.7% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.1% | +2.3% | +42.1% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IBCP and SFNC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 28% valuation discount to ABCB's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABCB offers better value at 1.48x vs IBCP's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.9B | $699M | $3.1B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $764M | $3.4B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.38x | 10.38x | -7.24x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.81x | 9.56x | 10.35x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.48x | 1.97x | — | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.95x | 9.39x | — | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.54x | 2.22x | 4.93x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 1.41x | 0.84x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.93x | 9.96x | 6.88x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBCP's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | +14.2% | -11.6% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.3% | -1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +10.2% | -9.1% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +2.6% | -4.2% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.23x | 0.19x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $489M | $65M | $261M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $254M | $52M | $380M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $743M | $117M | $641M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.17x | 0.91x | -1.01x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABCB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, ABCB leads with a +46.5% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABCB at 44.0% vs SFNC's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.9% | +7.2% | +14.6% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.5% | +12.6% | +16.7% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.8% | +130.6% | +53.4% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.1% | +63.7% | -15.4% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.8% | +184.6% | +25.2% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.0% | +32.1% | +15.3% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABCB and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABCB currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.83x | 1.02x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.99 | $37.39 | $22.18 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.23 | $29.63 | $17.00 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +90.8% | +96.3% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 50.6 | 62.3 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 534K | 176K | 1.2M | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABCB as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs ABCB's 0.93%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $91.25 | $38.00 | $22.67 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +3.0% | +4.0% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 6 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.03 | $0.85 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
IBCP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). ABCB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
ABCB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ameris Bancorp (ABCB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Ameris Bancorp at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ameris Bancorp wins at 1. 32x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABCB returned +198. 8% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 24% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 23% for Independent Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ameris Bancorp grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB?
Ameris Bancorp (ABCB) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABCB leads at 32. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ameris Bancorp (ABCB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 32x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for Ameris Bancorp — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 11. 9% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Ameris Bancorp (ABCB).
09Is ABCB or IBCP or SFNC or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABCB and IBCP and SFNC and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.