Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ABCL vs SEER vs TWST vs RXRX vs ILMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ABCL vs SEER vs TWST vs RXRX vs ILMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $1.45B | $105M | $3.65B | $1.46B | $21.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75M | $16M | $409M | $66M | $4.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-146M | $-79M | $-81M | $-560M | $853M |
| Gross Margin | -48.2% | 40.7% | 52.1% | -34.4% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -402.1% | -5.2% | -33.9% | -8.8% | 20.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 26.8x |
| Total Debt | $137M | $26M | $137M | $78M | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129M | $41M | $183M | $743M | $1.42B |
ABCL vs SEER vs TWST vs RXRX vs ILMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbCellera Biologics… (ABCL) | 100 | 18.1 | -81.9% |
| Seer, Inc. (SEER) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Twist Bioscience Co… (TWST) | 100 | 43.6 | -56.4% |
| Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 36.3 | -63.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABCL vs SEER vs TWST vs RXRX vs ILMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and momentum.
- 160.6% revenue growth vs SEER's -8.1%
- +139.8% vs RXRX's -22.0%
SEER ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.84
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 16.53x
- Beta 0.84, current ratio 16.53x
- Beta 0.84 vs RXRX's 3.18
TWST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 318.1% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 0.7%
RXRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
ILMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 19.4% margin vs RXRX's -8.4%
- 13.4% ROA vs RXRX's -40.6%, ROIC 16.8% vs -95.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 160.6% revenue growth vs SEER's -8.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs RXRX's -8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs RXRX's 3.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +139.8% vs RXRX's -22.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs RXRX's -40.6%, ROIC 16.8% vs -95.8% |
ABCL vs SEER vs TWST vs RXRX vs ILMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ABCL vs SEER vs TWST vs RXRX vs ILMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TWST leads 1 • ABCL leads 0 • SEER leads 0 • RXRX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 269.0x SEER's $16M. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RXRX's -8.4%. On growth, ABCL holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75M | $16M | $409M | $66M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$280M | -$76M | -$115M | -$521M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$146M | -$79M | -$81M | -$560M | $853M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$174M | -$46M | -$95M | -$326M | $989M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -48.2% | +40.7% | +52.1% | -34.4% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -5.2% | -33.9% | -8.8% | +20.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -194.9% | -4.9% | -19.8% | -8.4% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -2.8% | -23.2% | -4.9% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +4.5% | +19.3% | -56.1% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | +8.6% | -7.6% | +56.0% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SEER and TWST and ILMN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $105M | $3.6B | $1.5B | $21.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $90M | $3.6B | $797M | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.84x | -1.35x | -45.03x | -2.27x | 25.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 26.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 6.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 19.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.29x | 7.52x | 9.68x | 19.58x | 4.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 0.36x | 7.40x | 1.29x | 7.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 22.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-54 for RXRX. RXRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs ABCL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.1% | -29.2% | -17.5% | -54.3% | +32.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.3% | -25.7% | -12.5% | -40.6% | +13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.8% | -21.3% | -26.9% | -95.8% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | -25.9% | -24.9% | -50.1% | +17.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.08x | 0.29x | 0.07x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | -$15M | -$46M | -$665M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $41M | $183M | $743M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $137M | $26M | $137M | $78M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.52x | — | — | -336.46x | 12.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWST five years ago would be worth $5,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $494 for SEER. Over the past 12 months, ABCL leads with a +139.8% total return vs RXRX's -22.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWST at 63.5% vs SEER's -19.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.5% | +3.3% | +80.7% | -22.1% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +139.8% | +1.6% | +78.6% | -22.0% | +81.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.6% | -47.2% | +336.9% | -41.6% | -27.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.4% | -95.1% | -49.9% | -88.2% | -62.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.8% | -96.7% | +318.1% | -81.8% | +0.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.5% | -19.2% | +63.5% | -16.4% | -10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SEER and ILMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEER is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs RXRX's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.31x | 0.84x | 2.47x | 3.18x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.52 | $2.41 | $66.00 | $7.18 | $155.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.94 | $1.65 | $23.30 | $2.80 | $73.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +78.0% | +88.7% | +45.5% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.5 | 49.8 | 57.0 | 49.5 | 65.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 401K | 1.2M | 12.5M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABCL as "Buy", SEER as "Hold", TWST as "Buy", RXRX as "Hold", ILMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 318.5% upside for ABCL (target: $20) vs -15.4% for TWST (target: $50).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.17 | — | $49.50 | $11.00 | $147.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 4 | 13 | 10 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.3% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ABCL vs SEER vs TWST vs RXRX vs ILMN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABCL or SEER or TWST or RXRX or ILMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbCellera Biologics Inc.
(ABCL) is the stronger pick with 160. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABCL or SEER or TWST or RXRX or ILMN?
Over the past 5 years, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) delivered a total return of -49.
9%, compared to -95. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWST returned +318. 1% versus SEER's -96. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABCL or SEER or TWST or RXRX or ILMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seer, Inc.
(SEER) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning RXRX is approximately 278% more volatile than SEER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ABCL or SEER or TWST or RXRX or ILMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbCellera Biologics Inc.
(ABCL) is pulling ahead at 160. 6% versus -8. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -3. 0% for Seer, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SEER leads at 29. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABCL or SEER or TWST or RXRX or ILMN?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -863. 4% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -867. 9% for RXRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ILMN leads at 66. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ABCL or SEER or TWST or RXRX or ILMN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABCL: 318.
5% to $20. 17.
07Which pays a better dividend — ABCL or SEER or TWST or RXRX or ILMN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ABCL or SEER or TWST or RXRX or ILMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seer, Inc.
(SEER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84)). AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEER: -96. 7%, ABCL: -91. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ABCL and SEER and TWST and RXRX and ILMN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABCL is a small-cap high-growth stock; SEER is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.