Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ABLV vs AGMH vs BTBT vs BZUN vs VNET

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ABLV
Able View Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$33M
5Y Perf.-84.3%
AGMH
AGM Group Holdings Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$437K
5Y Perf.-98.9%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-22.1%
BZUN
Baozun Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$165M
5Y Perf.-29.4%
VNET
VNET Group, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2.60B
5Y Perf.+138.9%

ABLV vs AGMH vs BTBT vs BZUN vs VNET — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ABLV logoABLV
AGMH logoAGMH
BTBT logoBTBT
BZUN logoBZUN
VNET logoVNET
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesSoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital MarketsSpecialty RetailInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$33M$437K$589M$165M$2.60B
Revenue (TTM)$113M$32M$164M$9.77B$9.50B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$3M$137M$-204M$-568M
Gross Margin12.3%21.4%61.9%49.2%22.7%
Operating Margin0.6%18.6%16.8%-0.5%9.0%
Forward P/E0.1x9.2x1.0x34.7x
Total Debt$11M$2M$14M$2.52B$18.45B
Cash & Equiv.$15M$1M$95M$1.64B$2.04B

ABLV vs AGMH vs BTBT vs BZUN vs VNETLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ABLV
AGMH
BTBT
BZUN
VNET
StockAug 23May 26Return
Able View Inc. (ABLV)10015.7-84.3%
AGM Group Holdings … (AGMH)1001.1-98.9%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10077.9-22.1%
Baozun Inc. (BZUN)10070.6-29.4%
VNET Group, Inc. (VNET)100238.9+138.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ABLV vs AGMH vs BTBT vs BZUN vs VNET

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AGM Group Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. BZUN and VNET also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ABLV
Able View Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ABLV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
AGMH
AGM Group Holdings Inc.
The Value Play

AGMH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (0.1x vs 34.7x)
Best for: value
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 3.37, yield 0.3%
  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • Beta 3.37, yield 0.3%, current ratio 5.39x
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs AGMH's -65.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BZUN
Baozun Inc.
The Defensive Pick

BZUN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 1.93x
  • Beta 1.48 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
VNET
VNET Group, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

VNET is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -36.8% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
  • +42.2% vs AGMH's -80.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs AGMH's -65.5%
ValueAGMH logoAGMHLower P/E (0.1x vs 34.7x)
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs VNET's -6.0%
Stability / SafetyBZUN logoBZUNBeta 1.48 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield, vs ABLV's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)VNET logoVNET+42.2% vs AGMH's -80.1%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs BZUN's -2.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -1.3%

ABLV vs AGMH vs BTBT vs BZUN vs VNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ABLVAble View Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AGMHAGM Group Holdings Inc.
FY 2020
Other Segments
100.0%$106,610
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
BZUNBaozun Inc.
FY 2024
Service
63.2%$6.0B
Product
36.8%$3.5B
VNETVNET Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Hosting and Related Services
83.8%$71M
Cloud Services
16.2%$14M

ABLV vs AGMH vs BTBT vs BZUN vs VNET — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAGMHLAGGINGBZUN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BZUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.8B annually — 304.8x AGMH's $32M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNET's -6.0%. On growth, VNET holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.AGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$113M$32M$164M$9.8B$9.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$902,648$6M$166M-$4M$2.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$3M$137M-$204M-$568M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M$7M-$448M$0-$3.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+12.3%+21.4%+61.9%+49.2%+22.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.6%+18.6%+16.8%-0.5%+9.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.1%+9.7%+17.3%-2.1%-6.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.7%+22.2%-65.3%-1.1%-40.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.7%-49.9%+4.8%+23.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+97.8%+159.2%+2.8%-29.2%-2.1%
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AGMH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 0.1x trailing earnings, AGMH trades at a 100% valuation discount to VNET's 92.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGMH's 0.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZUN's 15.4x.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.AGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$33M$436,590$589M$165M$2.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$29M$1M$508M$294M$5.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.72x0.14x9.15x-6.08x92.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.95x34.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple0.25x8.49x15.40x15.40x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.26x0.01x3.60x0.12x2.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.95x0.02x0.56x0.19x2.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.06x
AGMH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AGMH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABLV delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-8 for VNET. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGMH scores 8/9 vs ABLV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.AGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+27.9%+14.3%+21.4%-3.7%-7.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.4%+5.1%+19.0%-2.1%-1.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-81.3%+17.7%+6.5%-1.3%+2.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-25.4%+28.7%+8.5%-1.7%+3.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–928667
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.57x0.10x0.03x0.44x2.67x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M-$1M-$81M$879M$16.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$1M$95M$1.6B$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11M$2M$14M$2.5B$18.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-22.79x-0.78x1.75x
AGMH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

VNET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VNET five years ago would be worth $3,486 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15 for AGMH. Over the past 12 months, VNET leads with a +42.2% total return vs AGMH's -80.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 44.2% vs AGMH's -79.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.AGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-0.4%-54.5%-10.3%-1.8%-1.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-48.1%-80.1%-9.0%-15.9%+42.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-99.2%-19.7%-40.4%+199.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-99.8%-84.6%-91.6%-65.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-99.7%-60.4%-49.3%-36.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.4%-79.8%-7.1%-15.8%+44.2%
VNET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ABLV and VNET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABLV is the less volatile stock with a -0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VNET currently trades 61.9% from its 52-week high vs AGMH's 5.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.AGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.46x1.68x3.37x1.48x2.70x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.77$18.10$4.55$4.88$14.48
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.54$0.77$1.25$2.07$5.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+37.9%+5.0%+40.2%+56.6%+61.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.443.869.153.853.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded314K84K18.5M376K5.7M
Evenly matched — ABLV and VNET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BTBT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", BZUN as "Buy", VNET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 93.8% for BZUN (target: $5). For income investors, BTBT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.31% vs ABLV's 0.21%.

MetricABLV logoABLVAble View Inc.AGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.VNET logoVNETVNET Group, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$5.35$23.55
# AnalystsCovering analysts21316
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.3%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$0.01$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.6%0.0%0.0%+8.5%0.0%
BTBT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). AGMH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallAGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ABLV vs AGMH vs BTBT vs BZUN vs VNET: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 5% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET?

On trailing P/E, AGM Group Holdings Inc.

(AGMH) is the cheapest at 0. 1x versus VNET Group, Inc. at 92. 4x. On forward P/E, Baozun Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET?

Over the past 5 years, VNET Group, Inc.

(VNET) delivered a total return of -65. 1%, compared to -99. 8% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VNET returned -36. 8% versus AGMH's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Able View Inc.

(ABLV) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 46β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately -839% more volatile than ABLV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -65. 5% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -175. 0% for Able View Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNET leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -5. 8% for Able View Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGMH leads at 18. 6% versus -6. 8% for ABLV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Baozun Inc.

(BZUN) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for VNET Group, Inc. — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173. 2% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield), ABLV (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AGMH, BZUN, VNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ABLV or AGMH or BTBT or BZUN or VNET better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Able View Inc.

(ABLV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 46)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABLV: -87. 8%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ABLV and AGMH and BTBT and BZUN and VNET?

These companies operate in different sectors (ABLV (Communication Services) and AGMH (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and BZUN (Consumer Cyclical) and VNET (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ABLV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGMH is a small-cap deep-value stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BZUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ABLV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AGMH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BZUN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VNET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ABLV and AGMH and BTBT and BZUN and VNET on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ABLV: -25.7% · AGMH: -49.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(ABLV: 2.1% · AGMH: 9.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.