Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ABOS vs PRAX vs IONS vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ABOS vs PRAX vs IONS vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $150M | $9.63B | $12.56B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $-92K | $1.06B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-133M | $-327M | $-327M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 98.3% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -33.3% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $110K | $2.61B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $357M | $372M | $214M |
ABOS vs PRAX vs IONS vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acumen Pharmaceutic… (ABOS) | 100 | 16.0 | -84.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 142.4 | +42.4% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 204.7 | +104.7% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABOS vs PRAX vs IONS vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 4.3% margin vs IONS's -30.9%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- +7.7% vs CRL's +32.8%
IONS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.55
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- Beta 0.55, current ratio 3.83x
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -2.5% ROA vs ABOS's -93.8%, ROIC 6.3% vs -42.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs IONS's -30.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs ABOS's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs CRL's +32.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.5% ROA vs ABOS's -93.8%, ROIC 6.3% vs -42.3% |
ABOS vs PRAX vs IONS vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABOS vs PRAX vs IONS vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRL leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ABOS leads 0 • IONS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IONS and CRL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. CRL is the more profitable business, keeping -4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IONS's -30.9%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | -$92,000 | $1.1B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$137M | -$357M | $4.5B | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$133M | -$327M | -$327M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$124M | -$283M | -$971M | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +98.3% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -33.3% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -30.9% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -91.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +87.0% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +2.7% | +39.8% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $150M | $9.6B | $12.6B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $144M | $9.3B | $14.8B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.44x | -24.72x | -31.94x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 13.31x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 8.54x | 24.87x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRL delivers a -5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-143 for ABOS. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRL scores 4/9 vs ABOS's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -143.1% | -43.0% | -58.6% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -93.8% | -40.2% | -10.1% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.3% | -65.0% | -12.8% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.8% | -49.3% | -14.1% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.00x | 5.35x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$357M | $2.2B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $357M | $372M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $110,000 | $2.6B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.95x | — | -3.64x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $20,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,229 for ABOS. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs CRL's +32.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ABOS's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.3% | +16.4% | -4.6% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.9% | +775.0% | +129.9% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.1% | +1976.5% | +116.1% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | -20.8% | +108.0% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | -20.1% | +121.1% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.1% | +174.9% | +29.3% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and IONS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IONS is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABOS's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ABOS's 68.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.93x | 1.55x | 0.55x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.60 | $356.00 | $86.74 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.96 | $35.18 | $31.66 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.6% | +93.6% | +87.6% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 55.6 | 58.8 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 595K | 378K | 2.0M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABOS as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 183.4% upside for ABOS (target: $7) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $544.40 | $107.27 | $205.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 16 | 32 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
CRL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ABOS vs PRAX vs IONS vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABOS or PRAX or IONS or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABOS or PRAX or IONS or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +108. 0%, compared to -87. 7% for Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +121. 1% versus ABOS's -87. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABOS or PRAX or IONS or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 93β — meaning ABOS is approximately 253% more volatile than IONS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ABOS or PRAX or IONS or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IONS leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABOS or PRAX or IONS or CRL?
Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ABOS) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -40. 4% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRL leads at 12. 6% versus -40. 5% for IONS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ABOS or PRAX or IONS or CRL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABOS: 183.
4% to $7. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ABOS or PRAX or IONS or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ABOS or PRAX or IONS or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), +121. 1% 10Y return). Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONS: +121. 1%, ABOS: -87. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ABOS and PRAX and IONS and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.