Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ADPT vs TWST vs NTRA vs ILMN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ADPT
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.-64.3%
TWST
Twist Bioscience Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.65B
5Y Perf.+49.8%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.16B
5Y Perf.+343.0%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.07B
5Y Perf.-59.8%

ADPT vs TWST vs NTRA vs ILMN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ADPT logoADPT
TWST logoTWST
NTRA logoNTRA
ILMN logoILMN
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$2.35B$3.65B$31.16B$21.07B
Revenue (TTM)$295M$409M$2.31B$4.39B
Net Income (TTM)$-50M$-81M$-208M$853M
Gross Margin75.3%52.1%64.8%67.1%
Operating Margin-15.8%-33.9%-13.4%20.9%
Forward P/E27.2x
Total Debt$281M$137M$214M$2.55B
Cash & Equiv.$70M$183M$1.08B$1.42B

ADPT vs TWST vs NTRA vs ILMNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ADPT
TWST
NTRA
ILMN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Adaptive Biotechnol… (ADPT)10035.7-64.3%
Twist Bioscience Co… (TWST)100149.8+49.8%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100443.0+343.0%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10040.2-59.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ADPT vs TWST vs NTRA vs ILMN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ILMN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ADPT
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
The Growth Play

ADPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 54.8%, EPS growth 63.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.3%
  • 54.8% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
Best for: growth exposure
TWST
Twist Bioscience Corporation
The Growth Angle

TWST plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 20.9% 10Y total return vs TWST's 318.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.5%, current ratio 3.39x
  • Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.39x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Income Pick

ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • beta 1.23
  • Better valuation composite
  • 19.4% margin vs TWST's -19.8%
  • Beta 1.23 vs TWST's 2.47
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthADPT logoADPT54.8% revenue growth vs ILMN's -0.8%
ValueILMN logoILMNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs TWST's -19.8%
Stability / SafetyILMN logoILMNBeta 1.23 vs TWST's 2.47
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ILMN logoILMN+81.7% vs NTRA's +37.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs TWST's -12.5%, ROIC 16.8% vs -26.9%

ADPT vs TWST vs NTRA vs ILMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ADPTAdaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
FY 2021
Sequencing Revenue
51.1%$79M
Development Support Revenue
42.4%$65M
Development Revenue Regulatory Milestones
6.5%$10M
TWSTTwist Bioscience Corporation
FY 2025
Ngs Tools
55.3%$208M
Synthetic Genes
30.2%$114M
Antibody Discovery
6.2%$23M
Oligo Pools
5.4%$20M
Dna And Biopharma Libraries
3.0%$11M
NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M
ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M

ADPT vs TWST vs NTRA vs ILMN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLILMNLAGGINGNTRA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 14.9x ADPT's $295M. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWST's -19.8%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricADPT logoADPTAdaptive Biotechn…TWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$295M$409M$2.3B$4.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$34M-$115M-$310M$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$50M-$81M-$208M$853M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$30M-$95M$97M$989M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.3%+52.1%+64.8%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.8%-33.9%-13.4%+20.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-16.8%-19.8%-9.0%+19.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.0%-23.2%+4.2%+22.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.1%+19.3%+39.8%+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.0%-7.6%+185.4%+6.1%
ILMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricADPT logoADPTAdaptive Biotechn…TWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$3.6B$31.2B$21.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$3.6B$30.3B$22.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-37.67x-45.03x-144.62x25.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.22x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.01x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.49x9.68x13.51x4.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.91x7.40x17.55x7.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF285.53x22.63x
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-24 for ADPT. NTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADPT's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs TWST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricADPT logoADPTAdaptive Biotechn…TWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.9%-17.5%-15.3%+32.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-9.9%-12.5%-10.6%+13.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-12.6%-26.9%-36.1%+16.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-13.2%-24.9%-18.3%+17.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95458
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.25x0.29x0.13x0.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$210M-$46M-$862M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$70M$183M$1.1B$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$281M$137M$214M$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-6.68x-25.21x12.09x
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TWST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,717 for ILMN. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +81.7% total return vs NTRA's +37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWST at 63.5% vs ILMN's -10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricADPT logoADPTAdaptive Biotechn…TWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.7%+80.7%-3.9%+3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+66.7%+78.6%+37.3%+81.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+122.6%+336.9%+314.0%-27.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-58.0%-49.9%+115.9%-62.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.5%+318.1%+2089.4%+0.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.6%+63.5%+60.6%-10.0%
TWST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NTRA and ILMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWST's 2.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs ADPT's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricADPT logoADPTAdaptive Biotechn…TWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.68x2.41x1.17x1.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.76$66.00$256.36$155.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.38$23.30$131.81$73.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.8%+88.7%+85.7%+89.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.357.057.165.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M1.2M1.3M1.5M
Evenly matched — NTRA and ILMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ADPT as "Buy", TWST as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.7% upside for ADPT (target: $21) vs 3.3% for TWST (target: $61).

MetricADPT logoADPTAdaptive Biotechn…TWST logoTWSTTwist Bioscience …NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.25$60.50$265.63$147.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts17132750
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%0.0%+3.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TWST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallIllumina, Inc. (ILMN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ADPT vs TWST vs NTRA vs ILMN: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ADPT or TWST or NTRA or ILMN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) is the stronger pick with 54.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ADPT or TWST or NTRA or ILMN?

Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -62. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +1835% versus ADPT's -65. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ADPT or TWST or NTRA or ILMN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Twist Bioscience Corporation's 2. 41β — meaning TWST is approximately 106% more volatile than NTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Natera, Inc. (NTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 125% for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ADPT or TWST or NTRA or ILMN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) is pulling ahead at 54.

8% versus -0. 8% for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to 0. 7% for Natera, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ADPT or TWST or NTRA or ILMN?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -21. 5% for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -36. 2% for TWST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADPT leads at 74. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ADPT or TWST or NTRA or ILMN more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADPT: 44.

7% to $21. 25.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ADPT or TWST or NTRA or ILMN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is ADPT or TWST or NTRA or ILMN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), +1835% 10Y return). Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) carries a higher beta of 2. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTRA: +1835%, TWST: +306. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ADPT and TWST and NTRA and ILMN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ADPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ADPT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ILMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ADPT and TWST and NTRA and ILMN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ADPT: 35.1% · TWST: 19.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.