Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ADSE vs STEM vs FLUX vs NRGV vs BE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Renewable Utilities
Electrical Equipment & Parts
ADSE vs STEM vs FLUX vs NRGV vs BE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Software - Infrastructure | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $663M | $74M | $23M | $716M | $62.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $146M | $153M | $51M | $217M | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-161M | $144M | $-6M | $-115M | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 0.2% | 36.3% | 32.1% | 22.1% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -50.4% | -35.1% | -1.9% | -35.8% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 123.6x |
| Total Debt | $63M | $369M | $16M | $95M | $2.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $49M | $1M | $58M | $2.45B |
ADSE vs STEM vs FLUX vs NRGV vs BE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADS-TEC Energy PLC (ADSE) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 47.5 | -52.5% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 965.0 | +865.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADSE vs STEM vs FLUX vs NRGV vs BE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADSE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.05
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.05, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.05 vs STEM's 3.66
STEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 94.2% margin vs ADSE's -110.6%
- 43.2% ROA vs ADSE's -129.6%, ROIC -57.1% vs -108.0%
Among these 5 stocks, FLUX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NRGV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs ADSE's -67.6%
BE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs ADSE's 11.1%
- +14.6% vs FLUX's -31.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs ADSE's -67.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.2% margin vs ADSE's -110.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs STEM's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs FLUX's -31.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 43.2% ROA vs ADSE's -129.6%, ROIC -57.1% vs -108.0% |
ADSE vs STEM vs FLUX vs NRGV vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ADSE vs STEM vs FLUX vs NRGV vs BE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADSE leads 0 • STEM leads 0 • FLUX leads 0 • NRGV leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 48.4x FLUX's $51M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADSE's -110.6%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $146M | $153M | $51M | $217M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$56M | -$16M | -$212,000 | -$72M | $240M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$161M | $144M | -$6M | -$115M | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$74M | -$8M | -$7M | -$98M | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +36.3% | +32.1% | +22.1% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.4% | -35.1% | -1.9% | -35.8% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -110.6% | +94.2% | -12.5% | -53.0% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.1% | -5.5% | -14.7% | -45.2% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.7% | -10.8% | -60.6% | +156.4% | +130.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.5% | +27.2% | -25.0% | -42.9% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STEM and FLUX and NRGV and BE each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $663M | $74M | $23M | $716M | $62.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $729M | $394M | $37M | $752M | $62.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.03x | -0.95x | -3.25x | -6.37x | -699.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 123.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 508.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.84x | 0.48x | 0.34x | 3.52x | 30.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | 7.50x | 78.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.82x | — | — | 1087.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STEM and FLUX and BE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-7 for FLUX. NRGV carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BE's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STEM scores 6/9 vs ADSE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -7.4% | -146.8% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -129.6% | +43.2% | -21.0% | -40.3% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.0% | -57.1% | -30.1% | -49.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.9% | -23.9% | — | -53.7% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 1.07x | 3.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56M | $320M | $15M | $36M | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $49M | $1M | $58M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $63M | $369M | $16M | $95M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.70x | 14.43x | -2.64x | -10.33x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $217 for STEM. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs FLUX's -31.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs STEM's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | -48.6% | -8.5% | -15.3% | +162.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.6% | -16.2% | -31.9% | +447.1% | +1464.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +375.1% | -89.5% | -66.1% | +140.7% | +1425.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.4% | -97.8% | -86.4% | -57.7% | +1013.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.1% | -95.5% | -69.0% | -57.1% | +934.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.1% | -52.9% | -30.3% | +34.0% | +148.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADSE and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs FLUX's 17.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 3.66x | 2.23x | 3.08x | 3.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.90 | $32.23 | $7.55 | $6.35 | $302.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.89 | $5.93 | $0.97 | $0.65 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +27.0% | +17.2% | +65.2% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 51.2 | 57.8 | 53.3 | 72.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 155K | 114K | 3.7M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADSE as "Hold", STEM as "Hold", NRGV as "Buy", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 137.2% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $20.67 | — | $2.75 | $187.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 17 | — | 7 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
ADSE vs STEM vs FLUX vs NRGV vs BE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADSE or STEM or FLUX or NRGV or BE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 6% for ADS-TEC Energy PLC (ADSE). Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ADSE or STEM or FLUX or NRGV or BE?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -97.
8% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +944. 1% versus STEM's -95. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ADSE or STEM or FLUX or NRGV or BE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ADS-TEC Energy PLC (ADSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 6958% more volatile than ADSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 4% for Bloom Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ADSE or STEM or FLUX or NRGV or BE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -67. 6% for ADS-TEC Energy PLC (ADSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ADSE or STEM or FLUX or NRGV or BE?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -174. 9% for ADS-TEC Energy PLC — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BE leads at 3. 6% versus -182. 6% for ADSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STEM leads at 35. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ADSE or STEM or FLUX or NRGV or BE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STEM: 137.
2% to $20. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — ADSE or STEM or FLUX or NRGV or BE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ADSE or STEM or FLUX or NRGV or BE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ADS-TEC Energy PLC (ADSE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05)). Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADSE: +12. 6%, STEM: -95. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ADSE and STEM and FLUX and NRGV and BE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADSE (Industrials) and STEM (Technology) and FLUX (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.