Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AEI vs UHT vs HR vs SQFT vs STAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Industrial
AEI vs UHT vs HR vs SQFT vs STAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $17M | $563M | $7.03B | $45M | $7.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $149M | $1.15B | $18M | $864M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $18M | $-201M | $-7M | $244M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 94.4% | -9.7% | 64.6% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | -60.7% | 36.3% | 19.5% | 16.6% | 37.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.5x | — | — | 38.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $386M | $4.15B | $102M | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $7M | $26M | $8M | $15M |
AEI vs UHT vs HR vs SQFT vs STAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alset Inc. (AEI) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Universal Health Re… (UHT) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
| Healthcare Realty T… (HR) | 100 | 68.3 | -31.7% |
| Presidio Property T… (SQFT) | 100 | 11.7 | -88.3% |
| STAG Industrial, In… (STAG) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEI vs UHT vs HR vs SQFT vs STAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AEI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +83.0% vs SQFT's -41.9%
UHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 7.3%
- Beta 0.22, yield 7.3%, current ratio 15.19x
- Lower P/E (23.5x vs 38.4x)
- 7.3% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HR's 5.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 88.7%, current ratio 1.75x
- Beta 0.19 vs AEI's 2.77
Among these 5 stocks, SQFT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
STAG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.1%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 149.2% 10Y total return vs HR's 40.1%
- 10.1% FFO/revenue growth vs HR's -6.9%
- 28.3% margin vs AEI's -105.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.1% FFO/revenue growth vs HR's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.5x vs 38.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.3% margin vs AEI's -105.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs AEI's 2.77 | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HR's 5.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.0% vs SQFT's -41.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs AEI's -7.5%, ROIC 3.5% vs -3.9% |
AEI vs UHT vs HR vs SQFT vs STAG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AEI vs UHT vs HR vs SQFT vs STAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AEI leads in 1 of 6 categories
STAG leads 1 • HR leads 1 • UHT leads 1 • SQFT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UHT and STAG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 94.9x AEI's $12M. STAG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEI's -105.0%. On growth, UHT holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $149M | $1.1B | $18M | $864M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $83M | $767M | $8M | $634M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $18M | -$201M | -$7M | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $50M | $201M | -$67,454 | $443M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +94.4% | -9.7% | +64.6% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.7% | +36.3% | +19.5% | +16.6% | +37.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -105.0% | +11.8% | -17.5% | -38.7% | +28.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +74.0% | +33.3% | +17.5% | -0.4% | +51.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.9% | +2.0% | -10.5% | -11.2% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -73.7% | -5.9% | +99.8% | -188.7% | -34.7% |
Valuation Metrics
AEI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.7x trailing earnings, STAG trades at a 17% valuation discount to UHT's 32.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UHT's 14.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SQFT's 27.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $563M | $7.0B | $45M | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$7M | $943M | $11.2B | $139M | $10.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.26x | 31.98x | -28.38x | -1.60x | 26.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.47x | — | — | 38.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 13.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.82x | 16.92x | 26.97x | 17.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 5.68x | 5.95x | 2.36x | 8.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 3.69x | 1.51x | 1.28x | 2.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.34x | 11.48x | 55.37x | — | 18.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AEI and UHT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UHT delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SQFT. AEI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SQFT's 2.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HR scores 7/9 vs SQFT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.7% | +10.9% | -4.3% | -23.1% | +6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +3.1% | -2.1% | -5.3% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.9% | +4.8% | +0.7% | -0.2% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | +8.9% | +1.0% | -0.2% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 2.53x | 0.89x | 2.92x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $379M | $4.1B | $94M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $7M | $26M | $8M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $386M | $4.1B | $102M | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.74x | 1.77x | -0.21x | -0.06x | 3.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STAG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STAG five years ago would be worth $12,652 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $144 for AEI. Over the past 12 months, AEI leads with a +83.0% total return vs SQFT's -41.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STAG at 7.0% vs SQFT's -21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.3% | +5.3% | +20.3% | +1.1% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +83.0% | +11.6% | +38.3% | -41.9% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.1% | +10.9% | +18.2% | -51.3% | +22.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -15.9% | +1.9% | -71.1% | +26.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +18.4% | +40.1% | -74.1% | +149.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.7% | +3.5% | +5.7% | -21.3% | +7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
HR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEI's 2.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HR currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SQFT's 15.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.77x | 0.22x | 0.19x | 0.79x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.55 | $44.70 | $20.46 | $23.00 | $39.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $35.26 | $14.09 | $2.10 | $33.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.2% | +90.9% | +98.5% | +15.7% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 43.9 | 71.8 | 54.9 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 60K | 3.6M | 1.0M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
UHT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UHT as "Hold", HR as "Hold", STAG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.3% upside for STAG (target: $40) vs 0.5% for HR (target: $20). For income investors, UHT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.29% vs STAG's 3.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $20.25 | — | $40.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 29 | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.3% | +5.5% | +5.0% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.96 | $1.11 | $0.18 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
AEI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). STAG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AEI vs UHT vs HR vs SQFT vs STAG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is the stronger pick with 10. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR). STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (38. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG?
On trailing P/E, STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is the cheapest at 26. 7x versus Universal Health Realty Income Trust at 32. 0x. On forward P/E, Universal Health Realty Income Trust is actually cheaper at 23. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG?
Over the past 5 years, STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) delivered a total return of +26. 5%, compared to -98. 6% for Alset Inc. (AEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STAG returned +149. 2% versus AEI's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Alset Inc. 's 2. 77β — meaning AEI is approximately 1341% more volatile than HR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alset Inc. (AEI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is pulling ahead at 10. 1% versus -6. 9% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alset Inc. grew EPS 93. 4% year-over-year, compared to -430. 9% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STAG leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG?
STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 4% net margin versus -135. 4% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STAG leads at 37. 7% versus -19. 5% for AEI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHT leads at 94. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) trades at 23.
5x forward P/E versus 38. 4x for STAG Industrial, Inc. — 14. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STAG: 3. 3% to $40. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG?
In this comparison, UHT (7.
3% yield), HR (5. 5% yield), SQFT (5. 0% yield), STAG (3. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AEI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AEI or UHT or HR or SQFT or STAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 5. 5% yield). Alset Inc. (AEI) carries a higher beta of 2. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HR: +40. 1%, AEI: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AEI and UHT and HR and SQFT and STAG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AEI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UHT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SQFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STAG is a small-cap income-oriented stock. UHT, HR, SQFT, STAG pay a dividend while AEI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.