AEIS
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$13.38B
5Y Perf.+434.6%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AEIS vs GTLS vs MKSI vs FBIN vs ENTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+428.5%
MKSI
MKS Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+196.5%
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-27.2%
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$22.48B
5Y Perf.+149.0%
AEIS vs GTLS vs MKSI vs FBIN vs ENTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AEIS | GTLS | MKSI | FBIN | ENTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Construction | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $13.38B | $9.93B | $20.25B | $4.68B | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $4.26B | $4.07B | $3.36B | $3.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $191M | $40M | $327M | $195M | $265M |
| Gross Margin | 38.7% | 32.6% | 45.2% | 45.6% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 8.5% | 14.8% | 10.6% | 29.1% |
| Forward P/E | 38.3x | 16.4x | 27.3x | 11.6x | 41.0x |
| Total Debt | $679M | $3.74B | $4.69B | $2.54B | $3.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $791M | $366M | $675M | $264M | $360M |
AEIS vs GTLS vs MKSI vs FBIN vs ENTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AEIS
GTLS
MKSI
FBIN
ENTG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Energy Ind… (AEIS) | 100 | 534.6 | +434.6% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.5 | +428.5% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 296.5 | +196.5% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 249.0 | +149.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEIS vs GTLS vs MKSI vs FBIN vs ENTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AEIS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. GTLS and MKSI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AEIS
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
AEIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 168.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
- 21.4% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2%
- 10.0% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Choice
GTLS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.56 vs ENTG's 2.66
Best for: stability
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Momentum Pick
MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +306.1% vs FBIN's -16.8%
Best for: momentum
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Income Pick
FBIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.61, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.61, current ratio 1.84x
- Beta 1.61, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.84x
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 41.0x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
The Technology Pick
Among these 5 stocks, ENTG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AEIS | 21.4% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 41.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | AEIS | 10.0% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLS | Beta 0.56 vs ENTG's 2.66 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ENTG's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MKSI | +306.1% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AEIS | 7.7% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 12.2% vs 7.4% |
AEIS vs GTLS vs MKSI vs FBIN vs ENTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
AEIS vs GTLS vs MKSI vs FBIN vs ENTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAEISLAGGINGENTG
Who Leads Where
AEIS leads in 3 of 6 categories
FBIN leads 2 • GTLS leads 1 • MKSI leads 0 • ENTG leads 0
Explore the data ↓ENTGEntegris, Inc.
0leads
MKSIMKS Inc.
0leads
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
1leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
2leads
AEISAdvanced Energy Indus…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBINvs GTLSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AEIS3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AEIS8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AEIS3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FBIN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 2.2x AEIS's $1.9B. AEIS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, AEIS holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AEISAdvanced Energy I… | GTLSChart Industries,… | MKSIMKS Inc. | FBINFortune Brands In… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $4.3B | $4.1B | $3.4B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $244M | $644M | $945M | $482M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $191M | $40M | $327M | $195M | $265M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $203M | $401M | $420M | $721M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +32.6% | +45.2% | +45.6% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +8.5% | +14.8% | +10.6% | +29.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +0.9% | +8.0% | +5.8% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +4.8% | +9.8% | +12.5% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.3% | -2.5% | +15.2% | -106.4% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +143.1% | -36.1% | +53.2% | -2.0% | +46.3% |
AEIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FBIN's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AEIS's 51.6x.
| Metric | AEISAdvanced Energy I… | GTLSChart Industries,… | MKSIMKS Inc. | FBINFortune Brands In… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.4B | $9.9B | $20.2B | $4.7B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $13.3B | $24.3B | $7.0B | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 91.65x | 628.45x | 68.83x | 15.82x | 95.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.32x | 16.40x | 27.27x | 11.56x | 41.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 48.97x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 51.60x | 14.33x | 26.70x | 10.08x | 19.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.44x | 2.33x | 5.15x | 1.05x | 7.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.97x | 2.79x | 7.49x | 1.98x | 5.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 106.31x | 48.95x | 40.74x | 12.77x | 56.74x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEIS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEIS delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. AEIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEIS scores 7/9 vs ENTG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AEISAdvanced Energy I… | GTLSChart Industries,… | MKSIMKS Inc. | FBINFortune Brands In… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | +1.2% | +12.2% | +8.3% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +0.4% | +3.7% | +3.0% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +7.4% | +6.5% | +8.1% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.1% | +8.6% | +7.2% | +9.9% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 1.11x | 1.73x | 1.07x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$112M | $3.4B | $4.0B | $2.3B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $791M | $366M | $675M | $264M | $360M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $679M | $3.7B | $4.7B | $2.5B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.62x | 1.08x | 2.84x | 4.72x | 2.47x |
AEIS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEIS five years ago would be worth $39,274 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEIS at 59.9% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AEISAdvanced Energy I… | GTLSChart Industries,… | MKSIMKS Inc. | FBINFortune Brands In… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.6% | +0.6% | +78.8% | -22.8% | +65.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +220.9% | +37.6% | +306.1% | -16.8% | +88.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +308.8% | +62.7% | +266.0% | -36.3% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +292.7% | +29.5% | +66.5% | -54.0% | +30.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +928.9% | +772.5% | +750.6% | -2.4% | +1040.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.9% | +17.6% | +54.1% | -13.9% | +23.3% |
AEIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AEISAdvanced Energy I… | GTLSChart Industries,… | MKSIMKS Inc. | FBINFortune Brands In… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 0.49x | 2.56x | 1.61x | 2.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $397.00 | $208.51 | $326.83 | $64.84 | $159.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $107.29 | $140.50 | $71.49 | $36.07 | $66.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.6% | +99.5% | +92.0% | +60.3% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 51.2 | 65.3 | 46.8 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 650K | 1.6M | 1.2M | 2.6M | 2.4M |
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FBIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AEIS as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", FBIN as "Hold", ENTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.4% upside for FBIN (target: $56) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs AEIS's 0.11%.
| Metric | AEISAdvanced Energy I… | GTLSChart Industries,… | MKSIMKS Inc. | FBINFortune Brands In… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $362.50 | $193.81 | $294.25 | $56.43 | $152.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 37 | 29 | 27 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.3% | +2.5% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.60 | $0.87 | $1.00 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +5.3% | 0.0% |
FBIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AEIS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallAdvanced Energy Industries,… (AEIS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AEIS vs GTLS vs MKSI vs FBIN vs ENTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG?
Over the past 5 years, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) delivered a total return of +292. 7%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENTG returned +1051% versus FBIN's -4. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning ENTG is approximately 454% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. grew EPS 168. 5% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG?
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 2% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus 10. 9% for AEIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 41. 0x for Entegris, Inc. — 29. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 44. 4% to $56. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 1% for Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS).
09Is AEIS or GTLS or MKSI or FBIN or ENTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), +772. 7% 10Y return). MKS Inc. (MKSI) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 7%, MKSI: +784. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AEIS and GTLS and MKSI and FBIN and ENTG?
These companies operate in different sectors (AEIS (Industrials) and GTLS (Industrials) and MKSI (Technology) and FBIN (Industrials) and ENTG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AEIS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. FBIN pays a dividend while AEIS, GTLS, MKSI, ENTG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AEIS: 26.3% · GTLS: -2.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(AEIS: 91.7x · GTLS: 628.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.