Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AFGB vs HCI vs ALL vs RNR vs TRV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Property & Casualty
AFGB vs HCI vs ALL vs RNR vs TRV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $1.99B | $55.00B | $12.98B | $64.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.03B | $927M | $67.14B | $11.49B | $48.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $879M | $314M | $12.14B | $3.09B | $6.29B |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 66.5% | 39.8% | 44.6% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 57.0% | 47.9% | 23.3% | 35.5% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 9.2x | 7.9x | 7.7x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $68M | $7.49B | $2.33B | $9.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.18B | $1.21B | $678M | $1.73B | $842M |
AFGB vs HCI vs ALL vs RNR vs TRV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Financial … (AFGB) | 100 | 80.5 | -19.5% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| The Allstate Corpor… (ALL) | 100 | 218.5 | +118.5% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
| The Travelers Compa… (TRV) | 100 | 279.4 | +179.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFGB vs HCI vs ALL vs RNR vs TRV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFGB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.46 vs 0.51
- 34.0% yield, vs TRV's 1.4%
HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs TRV's 201.4%
- PEG 0.19 vs TRV's 0.51
- 20.2% revenue growth vs AFGB's 1.3%
ALL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 24.5%, current ratio 0.37x
- Beta 0.12, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.37x
- Beta 0.12 vs AFGB's 0.74, lower leverage
RNR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +21.9% vs HCI's +2.4%
Among these 5 stocks, TRV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs AFGB's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.46 vs 0.51 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs AFGB's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs AFGB's 0.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 34.0% yield, vs TRV's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs HCI's +2.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs AFGB's 2.7% |
AFGB vs HCI vs ALL vs RNR vs TRV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AFGB vs HCI vs ALL vs RNR vs TRV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
AFGB leads 1 • ALL leads 0 • RNR leads 0 • TRV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALL is the larger business by revenue, generating $67.1B annually — 72.4x HCI's $927M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFGB's 10.9%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.0B | $927M | $67.1B | $11.5B | $48.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $454M | $16.0B | $4.1B | $8.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $879M | $314M | $12.1B | $3.1B | $6.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $431M | $11.5B | $4.2B | $7.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +66.5% | +39.8% | +44.6% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +57.0% | +47.9% | +23.3% | +35.5% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +33.9% | +18.1% | +26.9% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +46.4% | +17.2% | +36.7% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | +11.9% | +4.2% | -36.4% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.5% | +23.4% | +3.4% | +100.9% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AFGB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, AFGB trades at a 81% valuation discount to TRV's 10.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs TRV's 0.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $2.0B | $55.0B | $13.0B | $64.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$13.6B | $844M | $61.8B | $13.6B | $73.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.12x | 6.15x | 5.59x | 5.31x | 10.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.93x | 9.19x | 7.87x | 7.66x | 10.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | 0.13x | 0.33x | 0.18x | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -11.78x | 1.92x | 4.53x | 3.38x | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 2.20x | 0.83x | 1.02x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 1.77x | 1.85x | 0.70x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.27x | 4.47x | 5.57x | 3.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALL delivers a 42.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $17 for RNR. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFGB's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs AFGB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +32.0% | +42.7% | +16.6% | +19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +13.2% | +10.1% | +5.7% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +6.8% | +29.8% | +16.0% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.0% | +40.6% | +29.4% | +10.7% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.06x | 0.24x | 0.12x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15.4B | -$1.1B | $6.8B | $598M | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.2B | $1.2B | $678M | $1.7B | $842M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $68M | $7.5B | $2.3B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.20x | 67.24x | 40.22x | 33.28x | 19.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HCI five years ago would be worth $20,530 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,240 for AFGB. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs HCI's +2.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs AFGB's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.0% | -16.7% | +5.4% | +10.6% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.9% | +2.4% | +6.7% | +21.9% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.6% | +209.6% | +93.9% | +45.7% | +70.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.4% | +105.3% | +75.3% | +87.1% | +98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +436.8% | +258.7% | +176.9% | +201.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +45.7% | +24.7% | +13.4% | +19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALL and RNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFGB's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALL currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs HCI's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.39x | 0.12x | -0.03x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.47 | $210.50 | $222.22 | $318.20 | $313.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.74 | $136.37 | $188.08 | $231.17 | $249.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +72.6% | +96.2% | +94.5% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 48.7 | 56.4 | 46.9 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 167K | 1.3M | 303K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AFGB and TRV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HCI as "Buy", ALL as "Buy", RNR as "Hold", TRV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for ALL (target: $244) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, AFGB offers the higher dividend yield at 33.99% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $126.50 | $244.38 | $308.33 | $313.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 44 | 28 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +34.0% | +1.0% | +1.8% | +0.6% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.26 | $1.50 | $3.91 | $1.67 | $4.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +0.1% | +2.2% | +12.3% | +4.8% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AFGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AFGB vs HCI vs ALL vs RNR vs TRV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV?
On trailing P/E, American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus The Travelers Companies, Inc. at 10. 9x. On forward P/E, American Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus The Travelers Companies, Inc. 's 0. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV?
Over the past 5 years, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) delivered a total return of +105. 3%, compared to +2. 4% for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus AFGB's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus American Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning AFGB is approximately -2441% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 38% for American Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus 1. 3% for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for American Financial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 10. 4% for American Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AFGB leads at 97. 7% versus 16. 0% for TRV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCI leads at 73. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus The Travelers Companies, Inc. 's 0. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for The Travelers Companies, Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALL: 14. 4% to $244. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) offers the highest yield at 34. 0%, versus 0. 6% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR).
09Is AFGB or HCI or ALL or RNR or TRV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, AFGB: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFGB and HCI and ALL and RNR and TRV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AFGB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TRV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.