Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AFGB vs KMPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
AFGB vs KMPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $1.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.93B | $4.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $842M | $249M |
| Gross Margin | 87.0% | 1.3% |
| Operating Margin | 80.2% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $1.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.18B | $65M |
AFGB vs KMPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Financial … (AFGB) | 100 | 80.5 | -19.5% |
| Kemper Corporation (KMPR) | 100 | 51.9 | -48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFGB vs KMPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFGB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 34.0%
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth -4.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.0%
- 1.3% revenue growth vs KMPR's -5.7%
KMPR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 42.9% 10Y total return vs AFGB's 26.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 50.0%
- Beta 0.58, yield 3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.3% revenue growth vs KMPR's -5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 8.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.9 vs KMPR's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs AFGB's 0.74 | |
| Dividends | 34.0% yield, vs KMPR's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs KMPR's -44.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs KMPR's 2.0% |
AFGB vs KMPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AFGB vs KMPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AFGB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AFGB is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.9B annually — 1.6x KMPR's $4.8B. AFGB is the more profitable business, keeping 10.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 5.1%. On growth, KMPR holds the edge at +5.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.9B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.3B | $368M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $842M | $249M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $606M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.0% | +1.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +80.2% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.9% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.5% | -129.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AFGB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, AFGB trades at a 68% valuation discount to KMPR's 6.7x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$13.6B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.12x | 6.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.93x | 8.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -11.78x | 7.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 0.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.27x | 6.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AFGB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AFGB delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for KMPR. AFGB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMPR's 0.50x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.5% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.0% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15.4B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.2B | $65M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.61x | 7.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AFGB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AFGB five years ago would be worth $10,119 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,023 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, AFGB leads with a +7.7% total return vs KMPR's -44.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFGB at 2.0% vs KMPR's -7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.1% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.7% | -44.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.0% | -19.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | -49.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | -7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AFGB and KMPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KMPR is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFGB's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFGB currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.47 | $66.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.74 | $28.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.5 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 787K |
Analyst Outlook
AFGB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, AFGB offers the higher dividend yield at 33.98% vs KMPR's 3.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $48.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +34.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.26 | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +2.0% |
AFGB leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
AFGB vs KMPR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFGB or KMPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) is the stronger pick with 1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kemper Corporation (KMPR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFGB or KMPR?
On trailing P/E, American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Kemper Corporation at 6. 7x. On forward P/E, American Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFGB or KMPR?
Over the past 5 years, American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) delivered a total return of +1. 2%, compared to -49. 8% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KMPR returned +42. 9% versus AFGB's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFGB or KMPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kemper Corporation (KMPR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
58β versus American Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning AFGB is approximately 28% more volatile than KMPR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 50% for Kemper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFGB or KMPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) is pulling ahead at 1. 3% versus -5. 7% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kemper Corporation grew EPS 215. 5% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for American Financial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AFGB leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFGB or KMPR?
American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus 6. 9% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AFGB leads at 97. 7% versus 8. 4% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AFGB leads at 45. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFGB or KMPR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 7x for Kemper Corporation — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFGB or KMPR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) offers the highest yield at 34. 0%, versus 3. 8% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR).
09Is AFGB or KMPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kemper Corporation (KMPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
58), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KMPR: +42. 9%, AFGB: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFGB and KMPR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.