Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Brokers
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $1.73B | $1.99B | $10.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.03B | $4.71B | $927M | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $879M | $39M | $314M | $571M |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 8.1% | 66.5% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 57.0% | 0.7% | 47.9% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 7.8x | 9.2x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $1.00B | $68M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.18B | $126M | $1.21B | $346M |
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Financial … (AFGB) | 100 | 80.5 | -19.5% |
| Kemper Corporation (KMPR) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFGB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 17.1x), PEG 0.46 vs 1.26
- 34.0% yield, vs ERIE's 2.2%
- +6.9% vs KMPR's -50.2%
KMPR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs ERIE's 171.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.24x
- PEG 0.19 vs ERIE's 1.26
ERIE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.16 vs AFGB's 0.74
- 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs AFGB's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 17.1x), PEG 0.46 vs 1.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs AFGB's 0.74 | |
| Dividends | 34.0% yield, vs ERIE's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.9% vs KMPR's -50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1% |
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
AFGB leads 1 • KMPR leads 0 • ERIE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AFGB is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.0B annually — 8.7x HCI's $927M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.0B | $4.7B | $927M | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $21M | $454M | $786M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $879M | $39M | $314M | $571M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $382M | $431M | $537M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +8.1% | +66.5% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +57.0% | +0.7% | +47.9% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +0.8% | +33.9% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +8.1% | +46.4% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | -7.0% | +11.9% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.5% | -104.9% | +23.4% | +7.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AFGB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, AFGB trades at a 90% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $10.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$13.6B | $2.6B | $844M | $9.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.12x | 12.83x | 6.15x | 20.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.93x | 7.82x | 9.19x | 17.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — | 0.13x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -11.78x | 11.08x | 1.92x | 12.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.36x | 2.20x | 2.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 0.69x | 1.77x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.27x | 3.11x | 4.47x | 17.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI delivers a 32.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $1 for KMPR. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFGB's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +1.4% | +32.0% | +25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +0.4% | +13.2% | +17.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.1% | +6.8% | +29.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.0% | +1.3% | +40.6% | +32.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.38x | 0.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15.4B | $879M | -$1.1B | -$346M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.2B | $126M | $1.2B | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $1.0B | $68M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.20x | 0.59x | 67.24x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HCI five years ago would be worth $20,530 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, AFGB leads with a +6.9% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.0% | -24.9% | -16.7% | -20.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.9% | -50.2% | +2.4% | -38.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.6% | -29.0% | +209.6% | -0.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.4% | -55.2% | +105.3% | +14.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +31.6% | +436.8% | +171.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | -10.8% | +45.7% | -0.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AFGB and ERIE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ERIE is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFGB's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFGB currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.58x | 0.39x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.47 | $66.13 | $210.50 | $380.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.74 | $27.74 | $136.37 | $210.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +44.4% | +72.6% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 51.1 | 48.7 | 33.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 813K | 167K | 231K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AFGB and HCI and ERIE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KMPR as "Buy", HCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.4% upside for KMPR (target: $48) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, AFGB offers the higher dividend yield at 33.99% vs HCI's 0.98%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $48.00 | $126.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 14 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +34.0% | +4.3% | +1.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.26 | $1.27 | $1.50 | $4.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +17.5% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AFGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kemper Corporation (KMPR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE?
On trailing P/E, American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, American Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE?
Over the past 5 years, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) delivered a total return of +105. 3%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus AFGB's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus American Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning AFGB is approximately 355% more volatile than ERIE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 38% for American Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus 1. 3% for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -53. 4% for Kemper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCI leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 3. 0% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AFGB leads at 97. 7% versus 3. 3% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCI leads at 73. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMPR: 63. 4% to $48. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) offers the highest yield at 34. 0%, versus 1. 0% for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI).
09Is AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 2% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ERIE: +171. 6%, AFGB: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFGB and KMPR and HCI and ERIE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AFGB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KMPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.