Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AGAE vs NFLX vs MSFT vs TTWO vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Software - Infrastructure
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Consumer Electronics
AGAE vs NFLX vs MSFT vs TTWO vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Software - Infrastructure | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $20M | $374.00B | $3.13T | $46.67B | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $45.18B | $318.27B | $6.56B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5.38B | $10.98B | $125.22B | $-3.96B | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 48.5% | 68.3% | 55.3% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | -397.2% | 29.5% | 46.8% | -59.3% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.8x | 25.3x | 57.3x | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $31M | $14.46B | $112.18B | $4.11B | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $9.03B | $30.24B | $1.46B | $35.93B |
AGAE vs NFLX vs MSFT vs TTWO vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allied Gaming & Ent… (AGAE) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 164.1 | +64.1% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGAE vs NFLX vs MSFT vs TTWO vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGAE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 18.6% revenue growth vs TTWO's 5.3%
NFLX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- PEG 0.75 vs AAPL's 1.89
- Lower P/E (24.8x vs 33.8x), PEG 0.75 vs 1.89
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs AGAE's -290.2%
- 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, TTWO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AAPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
- +47.0% vs AGAE's -60.3%
- 34.0% ROA vs TTWO's -39.6%, ROIC 67.4% vs -49.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs TTWO's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 33.8x), PEG 0.75 vs 1.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs AGAE's -290.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AGAE's 2.81 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.0% vs AGAE's -60.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs TTWO's -39.6%, ROIC 67.4% vs -49.8% |
AGAE vs NFLX vs MSFT vs TTWO vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AGAE vs NFLX vs MSFT vs TTWO vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
AAPL leads 2 • NFLX leads 1 • AGAE leads 0 • TTWO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 55581.5x AGAE's $8M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGAE's -2.9%. On growth, AGAE holds the edge at +852.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $45.2B | $318.3B | $6.6B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6.7B | $30.1B | $192.6B | -$2.7B | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5.4B | $11.0B | $125.2B | -$4.0B | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9.1B | $9.5B | $72.9B | $488M | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +48.5% | +68.3% | +55.3% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +29.5% | +46.8% | -59.3% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +24.3% | +39.3% | -60.4% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +20.9% | +22.9% | +7.4% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +852.5% | +17.6% | +18.3% | +24.9% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | +31.1% | +23.4% | +29.6% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 20% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $374.0B | $3.13T | $46.7B | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8M | $379.4B | $3.21T | $49.3B | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.16x | 34.89x | 30.86x | -8.74x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 25.34x | 57.26x | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | 1.64x | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 19.72x | — | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 8.28x | 11.10x | 8.28x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 14.32x | 9.15x | 18.31x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 43.66x | — | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-113 for TTWO. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTWO's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs AGAE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | +41.3% | +33.1% | -113.4% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.0% | +19.8% | +19.2% | -39.6% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.4% | +29.8% | +24.9% | -49.8% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.6% | +30.5% | +29.7% | -57.1% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.54x | 0.33x | 1.92x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $5.4B | $81.9B | $2.6B | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $9.0B | $30.2B | $1.5B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31M | $14.5B | $112.2B | $4.1B | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 55.65x | -69.94x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,185 for AGAE. Over the past 12 months, AAPL leads with a +47.0% total return vs AGAE's -60.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs AGAE's -18.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | -3.0% | -10.8% | -11.2% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.3% | -23.6% | -2.1% | -1.3% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +166.5% | +39.5% | +77.8% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.2% | +75.2% | +72.5% | +31.4% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +875.3% | +787.7% | +544.3% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.2% | +38.6% | +11.7% | +21.2% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGAE's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs AGAE's 13.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.81x | 0.39x | 0.89x | 0.63x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.79 | $134.12 | $555.45 | $264.79 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $75.01 | $356.28 | $187.63 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.7% | +65.8% | +75.8% | +84.4% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 35.3 | 54.0 | 62.5 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.2M | 44.0M | 32.5M | 1.6M | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", TTWO as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 10.3% for AAPL (target: $317). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs AAPL's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 | $551.75 | $291.25 | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 81 | 56 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 19 | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.23 | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.4% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). AAPL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AGAE vs NFLX vs MSFT vs TTWO vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc.
(AGAE) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -78. 2% for Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus AGAE's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. 's 2. 81β — meaning AGAE is approximately 623% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 192% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc.
(AGAE) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus 5. 3% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to -365. 8% for Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGAE leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -184. 6% for Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -256. 7% for AGAE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 57. 3x for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — 32. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. AGAE, NFLX, TTWO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AGAE or NFLX or MSFT or TTWO or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) carries a higher beta of 2. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, AGAE: -94. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGAE and NFLX and MSFT and TTWO and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (AGAE (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and MSFT (Technology) and TTWO (Technology) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AGAE is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while AGAE, NFLX, TTWO, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.