Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AHG vs JFIN vs QFIN vs LX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
AHG vs JFIN vs QFIN vs LX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Internet Content & Information | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $584M | $534M | $3.75B | $147M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $6.54B | $17.17B | $14.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-135M | $1.71B | $6.89B | $1.61B |
| Gross Margin | -1.9% | 80.9% | 61.8% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -11.3% | 32.1% | 43.9% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.5x | 0.5x | 0.5x | 0.3x |
| Total Debt | $82K | $52M | $1.65B | $5.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $176M | $541M | $4.45B | $2.25B |
AHG vs JFIN vs QFIN vs LX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akso Health Group (AHG) | 100 | 60.5 | -39.5% |
| Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) | 100 | 238.6 | +138.6% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AHG vs JFIN vs QFIN vs LX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 14.20x
- 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs QFIN's 5.4%
- Beta 0.14 vs LX's 1.25, lower leverage
- +48.6% vs LX's -70.4%
JFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 16.9%
- Beta 1.19, yield 16.9%, current ratio 2.15x
- 16.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs QFIN's 9.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 21.6% ROA vs AHG's -62.8%, ROIC 39.9% vs -73.9%
QFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs JFIN's -56.7%
- PEG 0.02 vs JFIN's 0.03
- 36.5% margin vs AHG's -9.1%
LX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 2.5%
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 0.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs QFIN's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 0.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs AHG's -9.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs LX's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs QFIN's 9.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs LX's -70.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.6% ROA vs AHG's -62.8%, ROIC 39.9% vs -73.9% |
AHG vs JFIN vs QFIN vs LX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AHG vs JFIN vs QFIN vs LX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
AHG leads 2 • QFIN leads 1 • LX leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 1161.6x AHG's $15M. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AHG's -9.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $6.5B | $17.2B | $14.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$164M | $2.1B | $8.0B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$135M | $1.7B | $6.9B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $0 | $10.8B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +80.9% | +61.8% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.3% | +32.1% | +43.9% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +26.2% | +36.5% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +11.8% | +53.5% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.8% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.8% | +44.9% | -9.7% | +110.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, JFIN trades at a 22% valuation discount to LX's 2.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.11x vs JFIN's 0.12x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $584M | $534M | $3.8B | $147M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $408M | $462M | $3.3B | $590M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.27x | 1.69x | 2.15x | 2.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.51x | 0.49x | 0.47x | 0.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.12x | 0.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.48x | 2.99x | 1.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 39.55x | 0.63x | 1.49x | 0.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.93x | 0.57x | 0.56x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 571.47x | 5.29x | 2.78x | 1.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN delivers a 39.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-68 for AHG. AHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LX's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs AHG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -67.8% | +39.7% | +28.8% | +14.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.8% | +21.6% | +12.2% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -73.9% | +39.9% | +23.1% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.0% | +32.2% | +35.6% | +19.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.02x | 0.07x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$176M | -$489M | -$2.8B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $541M | $4.5B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $81,737 | $52M | $1.7B | $5.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 153.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AHG five years ago would be worth $14,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,364 for LX. Over the past 12 months, AHG leads with a +48.6% total return vs LX's -70.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AHG at 87.1% vs QFIN's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.1% | -17.9% | -22.5% | -31.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.6% | -54.2% | -63.6% | -70.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +555.0% | +36.4% | +0.6% | +8.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.4% | +21.2% | -19.1% | -66.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.1% | -56.7% | +16.1% | -74.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +87.1% | +10.9% | +0.2% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
AHG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AHG is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LX's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AHG currently trades 82.0% from its 52-week high vs LX's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 1.19x | 1.20x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $19.23 | $47.00 | $9.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $3.71 | $12.30 | $2.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +25.7% | +28.1% | +22.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 54.0 | 53.7 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 147K | 63K | 1.4M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
JFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JFIN as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy", LX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 69.9% for LX (target: $4). For income investors, JFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 16.87% vs LX's 6.91%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $28.15 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +16.9% | +9.3% | +6.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.67 | $8.32 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +11.6% | 0.0% |
JFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). AHG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
AHG vs JFIN vs QFIN vs LX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Akso Health Group (AHG) is the stronger pick with 512.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN). Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX?
On trailing P/E, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. at 2. 2x. On forward P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qfin Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 02x versus Jiayin Group Inc. 's 0. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX?
Over the past 5 years, Akso Health Group (AHG) delivered a total return of +42.
4%, compared to -66. 4% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +16. 1% versus AHG's -97. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Akso Health Group (AHG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
14β versus LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. 's 1. 25β — meaning LX is approximately 777% more volatile than AHG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Akso Health Group (AHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 49% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Akso Health Group (AHG) is pulling ahead at 512.
1% versus 5. 4% for Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -23. 1% for Akso Health Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -913. 4% for Akso Health Group — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -1125. 4% for AHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JFIN leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Jiayin Group Inc. 's 0. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) trades at 0. 3x forward P/E versus 0. 5x for Akso Health Group — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX?
In this comparison, JFIN (16.
9% yield), QFIN (9. 3% yield), LX (6. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AHG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AHG or JFIN or QFIN or LX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Akso Health Group (AHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
14)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AHG: -97. 1%, LX: -74. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AHG and JFIN and QFIN and LX?
These companies operate in different sectors (AHG (Financial Services) and JFIN (Communication Services) and QFIN (Financial Services) and LX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AHG is a small-cap high-growth stock; JFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock. JFIN, QFIN, LX pay a dividend while AHG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 6.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.