Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AIRJ vs CWCO vs MSEX vs NRGV vs CLNE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Renewable Utilities
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
AIRJ vs CWCO vs MSEX vs NRGV vs CLNE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Renewable Utilities | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $211M | $529M | $955M | $716M | $507M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $132M | $199M | $217M | $439M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-927K | $18M | $44M | $-115M | $-99M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.6% | 33.3% | 22.1% | 11.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 139015.1% | 28.1% | -35.8% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.9x | 31.6x | 20.1x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $154K | $708.60B | $419M | $95M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $123.79T | $3M | $58M | $158M |
AIRJ vs CWCO vs MSEX vs NRGV vs CLNE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AirJoule Technologi… (AIRJ) | 100 | 35.6 | -64.4% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 338.9 | +238.9% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 31.8 | -68.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIRJ vs CWCO vs MSEX vs NRGV vs CLNE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIRJ is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
CWCO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
- 155.1% 10Y total return vs MSEX's 62.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 6.12x
- Beta 0.76, yield 100.0%, current ratio 6.12x
MSEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 22.1% margin vs NRGV's -53.0%
- 3.2% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC 4.7% vs -49.5%
NRGV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs AIRJ's -100.4%
- +447.1% vs AIRJ's -25.8%
Among these 5 stocks, CLNE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs AIRJ's -100.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs NRGV's -53.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NRGV's 3.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSEX's 2.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs AIRJ's -25.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC 4.7% vs -49.5% |
AIRJ vs CWCO vs MSEX vs NRGV vs CLNE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AIRJ vs CWCO vs MSEX vs NRGV vs CLNE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWCO leads in 3 of 6 categories
NRGV leads 1 • AIRJ leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • CLNE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLNE and AIRJ operate at a comparable scale, with $439M and $0 in trailing revenue. MSEX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRGV's -53.0%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $132M | $199M | $217M | $439M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $25.98T | $81M | -$72M | $62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$926,770 | $18M | $44M | -$115M | -$99M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $33.67T | -$19M | -$98M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +36.6% | +33.3% | +22.1% | +11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +139015.1% | +28.1% | -35.8% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% | +22.1% | -53.0% | -22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +254916.5% | -9.7% | -45.2% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +10.0% | +156.4% | +13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -110.9% | -11.5% | -100.0% | -42.9% | +90.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, AIRJ trades at a 96% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSEX's 15.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLNE's 94.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $211M | $529M | $955M | $716M | $507M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $183M | -$123.08T | $1.4B | $752M | $448M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.86x | — | 21.78x | -6.37x | -2.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.60x | 20.12x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.62x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -4.74x | 15.79x | — | 94.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.01x | 4.91x | 3.52x | 1.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 0.00x | 1.89x | 7.50x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.00x | — | — | 8.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWCO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSEX delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. AIRJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRGV's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CWCO scores 5/9 vs NRGV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | 0.0% | +9.1% | -146.8% | -17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | 0.0% | +3.2% | -40.3% | -9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -45.3% | +26.6% | +4.7% | -49.5% | -9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.6% | +16.0% | +4.4% | -53.7% | -9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.85x | 1.07x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | -$123.08T | $416M | $36M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $123.79T | $3M | $58M | $158M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154,229 | $708.6B | $419M | $95M | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4.33x | -10.33x | -1.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,619 for CLNE. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs AIRJ's -25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs AIRJ's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.9% | -3.9% | +3.0% | -15.3% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.8% | +47.9% | -12.8% | +447.1% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | +101.4% | -25.2% | +140.7% | -46.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | +197.4% | -28.4% | -57.7% | -73.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | +155.1% | +62.9% | -57.1% | -26.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.4% | +26.3% | -9.2% | +34.0% | -18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWCO currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs AIRJ's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.76x | -0.12x | 3.08x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.75 | $39.12 | $62.18 | $6.35 | $3.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $22.69 | $44.17 | $0.65 | $1.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +84.8% | +82.7% | +65.2% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 47.9 | 44.1 | 53.3 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 351K | 163K | 160K | 3.7M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIRJ as "Buy", CWCO as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy", NRGV as "Buy", CLNE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 101.1% upside for AIRJ (target: $7) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3). For income investors, CWCO offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MSEX's 2.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | — | $53.50 | $2.75 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +2.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 21 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $497756.41 | $1.37 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
CWCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NRGV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AIRJ vs CWCO vs MSEX vs NRGV vs CLNE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE?
On trailing P/E, AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) is the cheapest at 0.
9x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, Middlesex Water Company is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -73. 8% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWCO returned +155. 1% versus AIRJ's -64. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning NRGV is approximately -2582% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 107% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AirJoule Technologies Corporation grew EPS 117. 5% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus -52. 3% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus -36. 5% for NRGV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSEX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) trades at 20.
1x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIRJ: 101. 1% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield), MSEX (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. AIRJ, NRGV, CLNE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AIRJ or CWCO or MSEX or NRGV or CLNE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, NRGV: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIRJ and CWCO and MSEX and NRGV and CLNE?
These companies operate in different sectors (AIRJ (Industrials) and CWCO (Utilities) and MSEX (Utilities) and NRGV (Utilities) and CLNE (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AIRJ is a small-cap deep-value stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CWCO, MSEX pay a dividend while AIRJ, NRGV, CLNE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.