Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALAR vs CGNT vs VRNS vs RDWR vs SAIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
ALAR vs CGNT vs VRNS vs RDWR vs SAIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $58M | $793M | $3.37B | $1.22B | $6.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $377M | $660M | $302M | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-5M | $-137M | $20M | $-297M |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 70.9% | 78.1% | 80.7% | 66.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 0.9% | -21.9% | 3.8% | -16.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 46.9x | 242.2x | 25.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $36M | $572M | $17M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $113M | $202M | $105M | $121M |
ALAR vs CGNT vs VRNS vs RDWR vs SAIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alarum Technologies… (ALAR) | 100 | 122.5 | +22.5% |
| Cognyte Software Lt… (CGNT) | 100 | 123.2 | +23.2% |
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Radware Ltd. (RDWR) | 100 | 131.1 | +31.1% |
| SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALAR vs CGNT vs VRNS vs RDWR vs SAIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALAR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.01
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 160.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 45.9%
- Better valuation composite
- 3.2% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 59.0% vs -11.0%
Among these 5 stocks, CGNT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VRNS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.95 vs ALAR's 2.01
RDWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 164.8% 10Y total return vs VRNS's 317.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 4.4%, current ratio 1.63x
- 6.7% margin vs SAIL's -29.2%
- +26.5% vs VRNS's -36.7%
SAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 23.2% revenue growth vs RDWR's 9.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.2% revenue growth vs RDWR's 9.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.7% margin vs SAIL's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs ALAR's 2.01 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.5% vs VRNS's -36.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 59.0% vs -11.0% |
ALAR vs CGNT vs VRNS vs RDWR vs SAIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALAR vs CGNT vs VRNS vs RDWR vs SAIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALAR leads in 2 of 6 categories
RDWR leads 1 • CGNT leads 0 • VRNS leads 0 • SAIL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAIL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 28.0x ALAR's $36M. RDWR is the more profitable business, keeping 6.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIL's -29.2%. On growth, ALAR holds the edge at +80.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $377M | $660M | $302M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $16M | -$135M | $23M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$5M | -$137M | $20M | -$297M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $11M | $120M | $43M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +70.9% | +78.1% | +80.7% | +66.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +0.9% | -21.9% | +3.8% | -16.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -1.2% | -20.7% | +6.7% | -29.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +3.0% | +18.1% | +14.2% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +80.3% | +15.5% | +26.9% | +9.9% | +19.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.0% | +173.6% | 0.0% | +131.7% | +85.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ALAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, ALAR trades at a 85% valuation discount to RDWR's 63.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALAR's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SAIL's 160.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $58M | $793M | $3.4B | $1.2B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44M | $715M | $3.7B | $1.1B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.40x | -64.71x | -25.38x | 63.02x | -6.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 46.93x | 242.23x | 25.54x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.82x | 83.91x | — | 49.18x | 160.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 2.26x | 5.40x | 4.05x | 7.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.07x | 3.64x | 6.19x | 3.24x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.58x | 23.59x | 24.99x | 29.45x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ALAR and RDWR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RDWR delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. RDWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNS's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDWR scores 7/9 vs SAIL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | -2.0% | -27.4% | +5.3% | -8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | -0.9% | -8.2% | +3.1% | -4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +59.0% | -2.5% | -11.0% | +3.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.8% | -1.8% | -14.0% | +2.5% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.16x | 0.96x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | -$77M | $369M | -$88M | $926M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $113M | $202M | $105M | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $36M | $572M | $17M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.18x | 21.71x | -9.01x | — | -0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALAR and RDWR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDWR five years ago would be worth $10,190 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,532 for CGNT. Over the past 12 months, RDWR leads with a +26.5% total return vs VRNS's -36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALAR at 60.6% vs SAIL's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.6% | +23.6% | -10.5% | +19.3% | -35.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.5% | +13.4% | -36.7% | +26.5% | -33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +314.0% | +155.8% | +23.7% | +46.0% | -44.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.6% | -54.7% | -39.9% | +1.9% | -44.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -60.7% | +317.5% | +164.8% | -44.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.6% | +36.8% | +7.3% | +13.4% | -17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CGNT and VRNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRNS is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALAR's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGNT currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs ALAR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 1.27x | 0.95x | 0.99x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.00 | $11.66 | $63.90 | $31.57 | $24.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.50 | $6.29 | $19.70 | $21.29 | $10.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.4% | +94.3% | +44.9% | +89.8% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 66.7 | 66.1 | 54.5 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 496K | 2.3M | 228K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ALAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CGNT as "Hold", VRNS as "Buy", RDWR as "Hold", SAIL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.4% upside for SAIL (target: $22) vs -11.8% for RDWR (target: $25).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.75 | $36.00 | $25.00 | $21.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 34 | 14 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +3.4% | +0.9% | +0.1% |
ALAR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). RDWR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
ALAR vs CGNT vs VRNS vs RDWR vs SAIL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SailPoint, Inc.
(SAIL) is the stronger pick with 23. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Radware Ltd. (RDWR). Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL?
On trailing P/E, Alarum Technologies Ltd.
(ALAR) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Radware Ltd. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Radware Ltd. is actually cheaper at 25. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL?
Over the past 5 years, Radware Ltd.
(RDWR) delivered a total return of +1. 9%, compared to -54. 7% for Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRNS returned +317. 5% versus ALAR's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Varonis Systems, Inc.
(VRNS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Alarum Technologies Ltd. 's 2. 01β — meaning ALAR is approximately 112% more volatile than VRNS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Radware Ltd. (RDWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 96% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SailPoint, Inc.
(SAIL) is pulling ahead at 23. 2% versus 9. 8% for Radware Ltd. (RDWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Radware Ltd. grew EPS 221. 4% year-over-year, compared to -31. 4% for Varonis Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALAR leads at 45. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL?
Alarum Technologies Ltd.
(ALAR) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus -36. 7% for SailPoint, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALAR leads at 21. 1% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RDWR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Radware Ltd.
(RDWR) trades at 25. 5x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 216. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAIL: 76. 4% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ALAR or CGNT or VRNS or RDWR or SAIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Varonis Systems, Inc.
(VRNS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), +317. 5% 10Y return). Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRNS: +317. 5%, ALAR: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALAR and CGNT and VRNS and RDWR and SAIL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; CGNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RDWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.