Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ALDF vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
ALDF vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $317M | $485M | $1.44B | $451M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B | $951M | $953M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4K | $-183M | $133M | $56M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% | 46.4% | 21.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% | 19.1% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 168.5x | 4.3x | 6.0x | 5.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.66B | $1.13B | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.35B | $306M | $77M |
ALDF vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aldel Financial II … (ALDF) | 100 | 107.0 | +7.0% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 54.9 | -45.1% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 67.7 | -32.3% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 46.9 | -53.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALDF vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALDF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs EVTC's 89.5%
- +4.0% vs PSFE's -37.1%
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 5.8x)
EVTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 27.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 0.76, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
- 10.2% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2%
PRTH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.12
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 5.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs PSFE's 2.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.0% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8%, ROIC 10.2% vs 3.6% |
ALDF vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALDF vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EVTC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • ALDF leads 1 • PRTH leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVTC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and ALDF operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -10.7%. On growth, PRTH holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $951M | $953M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $371M | $316M | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$183M | $133M | $56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $136M | $145M | $75M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% | +46.4% | +21.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% | +19.1% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% | +13.9% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% | +15.2% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +8.4% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -183.3% | -24.0% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to ALDF's 168.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EVTC's 7.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $485M | $1.4B | $451M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $316M | $1.8B | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 168.46x | -2.99x | 10.62x | 8.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x | 5.97x | 5.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.53x | 7.34x | 6.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x | 1.54x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 0.83x | 2.11x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9999.00x | 2.17x | 10.62x | 6.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. EVTC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs PSFE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | -24.1% | +18.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | -3.8% | +6.1% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.6% | +10.2% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +3.6% | +10.5% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x | 1.58x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $1.3B | $824M | $969M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.3B | $306M | $77M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x | 3.10x | 1.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALDF and PRTH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALDF five years ago would be worth $10,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, ALDF leads with a +4.0% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | +17.7% | -18.4% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.0% | -37.1% | -31.9% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.4% | -34.9% | -31.7% | +50.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.4% | -94.2% | -43.3% | -15.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.4% | -92.1% | +89.5% | -43.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.4% | -13.3% | -11.9% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ALDF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALDF is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALDF currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 2.35x | 0.76x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.66 | $16.49 | $38.56 | $8.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.20 | $5.95 | $22.83 | $4.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +56.9% | +60.6% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 65.3 | 40.6 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 361K | 431K | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs 6.5% for PSFE (target: $10). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | $37.00 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 18 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% | +4.8% | +2.3% |
EVTC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ALDF vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Aldel Financial II Inc. at 168. 5x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH?
Over the past 5 years, Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) delivered a total return of +7. 4%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +89. 5% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately -10081% more volatile than ALDF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 158% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVTC leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus 0. 0% for ALDF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVTC leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 6. 0x for EVERTEC, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ALDF, PSFE, PRTH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALDF or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALDF: +7. 4%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALDF and PSFE and EVTC and PRTH?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALDF (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and EVTC (Technology) and PRTH (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALDF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock. EVTC pays a dividend while ALDF, PSFE, PRTH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.