Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $104M | $9.53B | $3.84B | $589K | $6.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.10B | $254K | $827M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $-327M | $376M | $-36M | $-187M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 91.5% | -3.1% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 7.4% | -150.6% | -8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 24.7x | — | 55.6x | — | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $110K | $52M | $32M | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55M | $357M | $178M | $51M | $985M |
ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aldeyra Therapeutic… (ALDX) | 100 | 25.9 | -74.1% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 141.2 | +41.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, ALDX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs KALA's -97.7%
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 3.83x
- 34.3% margin vs KALA's -141.1%
- 26.2% ROA vs KALA's -143.2%
KALA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 262.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.03
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.9%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 262.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs KALA's -141.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs KALA's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs KALA's -97.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs KALA's -143.2% |
ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTCT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • ALDX leads 0 • KALA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KALA's -141.1%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $1.1B | $254,000 | $827M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$45M | -$357M | $96M | -$38M | -$37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | -$327M | $376M | -$36M | -$187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$283M | $212M | -$32M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +91.5% | -3.1% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +7.4% | -150.6% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +34.3% | -141.1% | -22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +19.4% | -126.3% | -20.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +9.7% | — | -76.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.0% | +2.7% | -81.8% | +44.6% | -100.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 3% valuation discount to ACAD's 9.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104M | $9.5B | $3.8B | $589,431 | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $9.2B | $3.7B | -$18M | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.84x | -24.48x | 9.78x | -0.01x | 9.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.71x | — | 55.62x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.71x | — | 6.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 3.58x | — | 3.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 8.46x | 3.13x | 0.04x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 36.48x | — | 8.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-4 for KALA. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALA's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs ALDX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.7% | -43.0% | +35.6% | -3.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -55.5% | -40.2% | +26.2% | -143.2% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | -65.0% | +10.0% | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.7% | -49.3% | +10.1% | -95.2% | +55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.00x | 0.04x | 2.62x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | -$357M | -$126M | -$19M | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55M | $357M | $178M | $51M | $985M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $110,000 | $52M | $32M | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.72x | — | — | -6.92x | -1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $18,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for KALA. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs KALA's -97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs KALA's -82.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.0% | +15.2% | -14.3% | -87.2% | -4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.9% | +767.1% | +32.3% | -97.7% | +73.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.8% | +1956.2% | +3.9% | -99.5% | +32.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | -14.9% | +6.6% | -100.0% | +89.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | -20.9% | -23.4% | -100.0% | +852.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.5% | +174.0% | +1.3% | -82.9% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and PTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTCT is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KALA's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs KALA's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.40x | 1.11x | 2.14x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.18 | $356.00 | $27.81 | $20.60 | $87.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $35.21 | $14.68 | $0.07 | $39.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.0% | +92.7% | +80.5% | +0.4% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 53.3 | 53.8 | 24.1 | 40.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 376K | 1.7M | 9.3M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALDX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", KALA as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22913.9% upside for KALA (target: $18) vs 33.0% for PTCT (target: $98).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.67 | $548.80 | $34.78 | $18.25 | $98.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 16 | 37 | 9 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PTCT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ACAD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (ALDX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 9. 8x. On forward P/E, Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +852. 1% versus KALA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus KALA BIO, Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning KALA is approximately 108% more volatile than PTCT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for KALA BIO, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -46. 9% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -141. 1% for KALA BIO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -150. 6% for KALA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) trades at 24. 7x forward P/E versus 55. 6x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 30. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KALA: 22913. 9% to $18. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, KALA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALDX and PRAX and ACAD and KALA and PTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALDX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; KALA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.