Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALDX
Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$104M
5Y Perf.-74.1%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.53B
5Y Perf.-37.1%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.84B
5Y Perf.-51.8%
KALA
KALA BIO, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
PTCT
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.11B
5Y Perf.+41.2%

ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALDX logoALDX
PRAX logoPRAX
ACAD logoACAD
KALA logoKALA
PTCT logoPTCT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$104M$9.53B$3.84B$589K$6.11B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$1.10B$254K$827M
Net Income (TTM)$-43M$-327M$376M$-36M$-187M
Gross Margin91.5%-3.1%49.7%
Operating Margin7.4%-150.6%-8.3%
Forward P/E24.7x55.6x9.5x
Total Debt$15M$110K$52M$32M$492M
Cash & Equiv.$55M$357M$178M$51M$985M

ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALDX
PRAX
ACAD
KALA
PTCT
StockOct 20May 26Return
Aldeyra Therapeutic… (ALDX)10025.9-74.1%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10062.9-37.1%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10048.2-51.8%
KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA)1000.0-100.0%
PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT)100141.2+41.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACAD and PTCT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. PTC Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. PRAX and KALA also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ALDX
Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ALDX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +7.7% vs KALA's -97.7%
Best for: momentum
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
  • Beta 1.11, current ratio 3.83x
  • 34.3% margin vs KALA's -141.1%
  • 26.2% ROA vs KALA's -143.2%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
KALA
KALA BIO, Inc.
The Growth Leader

KALA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 262.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth
PTCT
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • beta 1.03
  • Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
  • 8.5% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.9%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKALA logoKALA262.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValuePTCT logoPTCTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs KALA's -141.1%
Stability / SafetyPTCT logoPTCTBeta 1.03 vs KALA's 2.14
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs KALA's -97.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs KALA's -143.2%

ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ALDXAldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
KALAKALA BIO, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PTCTPTC Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration and License Revenue
54.6%$998M
Product
32.1%$587M
Royalty
13.4%$244M

ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPTCTLAGGINGKALA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KALA's -141.1%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricALDX logoALDXAldeyra Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$1.1B$254,000$827M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$45M-$357M$96M-$38M-$37M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$43M-$327M$376M-$36M-$187M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$40M-$283M$212M-$32M-$169M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+91.5%-3.1%+49.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.4%-150.6%-8.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+34.3%-141.1%-22.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.4%-126.3%-20.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%-76.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+48.0%+2.7%-81.8%+44.6%-100.3%
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 3% valuation discount to ACAD's 9.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.7x.

MetricALDX logoALDXAldeyra Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
Market CapShares × price$104M$9.5B$3.8B$589,431$6.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$65M$9.2B$3.7B-$18M$5.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.84x-24.48x9.78x-0.01x9.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.71x55.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.71x6.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.58x3.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.45x8.46x3.13x0.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.48x8.70x
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-4 for KALA. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALA's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs ALDX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricALDX logoALDXAldeyra Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-87.7%-43.0%+35.6%-3.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-55.5%-40.2%+26.2%-143.2%-6.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-3.7%-65.0%+10.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-56.7%-49.3%+10.1%-95.2%+55.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–913627
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.00x0.04x2.62x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$39M-$357M-$126M-$19M-$492M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$55M$357M$178M$51M$985M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$110,000$52M$32M$492M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-21.72x-6.92x-1.67x
PTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $18,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for KALA. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs KALA's -97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs KALA's -82.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALDX logoALDXAldeyra Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-63.0%+15.2%-14.3%-87.2%-4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-19.9%+767.1%+32.3%-97.7%+73.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.8%+1956.2%+3.9%-99.5%+32.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.6%-14.9%+6.6%-100.0%+89.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.1%-20.9%-23.4%-100.0%+852.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-45.5%+174.0%+1.3%-82.9%+9.9%
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRAX and PTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PTCT is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KALA's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs KALA's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALDX logoALDXAldeyra Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.28x1.40x1.11x2.14x1.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.18$356.00$27.81$20.60$87.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.07$35.21$14.68$0.07$39.53
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+28.0%+92.7%+80.5%+0.4%+84.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.553.353.824.140.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.6M376K1.7M9.3M1.1M
Evenly matched — PRAX and PTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ALDX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", KALA as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22913.9% upside for KALA (target: $18) vs 33.0% for PTCT (target: $98).

MetricALDX logoALDXAldeyra Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…KALA logoKALAKALA BIO, Inc.PTCT logoPTCTPTC Therapeutics,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.67$548.80$34.78$18.25$98.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts191637926
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PTCT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ACAD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallPTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALDX vs PRAX vs ACAD vs KALA vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (ALDX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?

On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 9. 8x. On forward P/E, Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?

Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +852. 1% versus KALA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus KALA BIO, Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning KALA is approximately 108% more volatile than PTCT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for KALA BIO, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -46. 9% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?

PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -141. 1% for KALA BIO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -150. 6% for KALA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.

(ALDX) trades at 24. 7x forward P/E versus 55. 6x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 30. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KALA: 22913. 9% to $18. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ALDX or PRAX or ACAD or KALA or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, KALA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ALDX and PRAX and ACAD and KALA and PTCT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ALDX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; KALA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ALDX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KALA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PTCT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.